<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Places You Must Use Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FavHost</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-253735</link>
		<dc:creator>FavHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-253735</guid>
		<description>It seems everyone&#039;s comments are just as informative as the blog itself.  ^5!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems everyone&#8217;s comments are just as informative as the blog itself.  ^5!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-248650</link>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-248650</guid>
		<description>You just copied Alexâ€™s entire article, and added a paragraph at the bottom saying that you agree with part and disagree with part?!? What chutzpah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just copied Alexâ€™s entire article, and added a paragraph at the bottom saying that you agree with part and disagree with part?!? What chutzpah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chirag Shukla</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-8883</link>
		<dc:creator>Chirag Shukla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 04:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-8883</guid>
		<description>I dont even find the need for AJAX even though I like it. Maybe my imagination doesnt stretch too far, but I prefer making one form that submits to itself and displays data after manipulation rather than calling a server side script through AJAX now and again. Its more on the use and internal data transfer speed. Not a bad architecture, AJAX. Google uses it in great fashion. I like that!

Live preview (as I type) underneath this comment is a waste, if it is using AJAX because I, as a web developer, can figure out how this posting is going to look like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont even find the need for AJAX even though I like it. Maybe my imagination doesnt stretch too far, but I prefer making one form that submits to itself and displays data after manipulation rather than calling a server side script through AJAX now and again. Its more on the use and internal data transfer speed. Not a bad architecture, AJAX. Google uses it in great fashion. I like that!</p>
<p>Live preview (as I type) underneath this comment is a waste, if it is using AJAX because I, as a web developer, can figure out how this posting is going to look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the lone sysadmin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-03-31</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>the lone sysadmin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-03-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajaxian Â» 6 Places You Must Use Ajax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajaxian Â» 6 Places You Must Use Ajax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bosworth</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bosworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m basically going on what I&#039;ve experienced personally. To me live-search features have never felt that useful. Maybe I haven&#039;t seen the right one :/

Real time error checking is indeed cool, I should add that to the wiki.

Simple forms that are not used that often? I still think they don&#039;t really need Ajaxification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m basically going on what I&#8217;ve experienced personally. To me live-search features have never felt that useful. Maybe I haven&#8217;t seen the right one :/</p>
<p>Real time error checking is indeed cool, I should add that to the wiki.</p>
<p>Simple forms that are not used that often? I still think they don&#8217;t really need Ajaxification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Grossberg</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Grossberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>Live-search isn&#039;t the only kind of Ajax search, though.

On my blog, I implemented a different sort of Ajax-based search -- one that lets you submit the form and get results without leaving the page. 

It&#039;s not anything life-changing, but I like it more than the default Movable Type search that I had before (or the awful Google Suggest rip-off that followed soon thereafter).

Also, &quot;places you *must* use Ajax&quot; sounds a bit overstated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live-search isn&#8217;t the only kind of Ajax search, though.</p>
<p>On my blog, I implemented a different sort of Ajax-based search &#8212; one that lets you submit the form and get results without leaving the page. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not anything life-changing, but I like it more than the default Movable Type search that I had before (or the awful Google Suggest rip-off that followed soon thereafter).</p>
<p>Also, &#8220;places you *must* use Ajax&#8221; sounds a bit overstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>Really, I think drag and drop is very useful for and far beyond the old way as far as re-ordering a list of items, so to call it a useless widget is a little much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, I think drag and drop is very useful for and far beyond the old way as far as re-ordering a list of items, so to call it a useless widget is a little much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Sanheim</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Sanheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>I think drag and drop can be very useful (see Basecamp&#039;s reordering of to-do items), but it has be carefully done to not be a usability mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think drag and drop can be very useful (see Basecamp&#8217;s reordering of to-do items), but it has be carefully done to not be a usability mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Hakman</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Hakman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>What I believe Alex is trying to get across stems from a very strict definition of AJAX ... that is AJAX is for asynch communications using javascript and xml.  

The rub though is, as others have pointed out in the past there&#039;s no D or V in &quot;AJAX&quot;.  No DHTML.  No VML.  No SVG.  Really no graphical user interface concept described in the terms underlying the AJAX acronym.  Tighly defined AJAX is just the way to get data to and from the client -- not how it gets displayed.

Accordingly from what I see there are currently four quantum states of the term &quot;AJAX&quot; today (all of which are exemplified in ajaxian.com&#039;s coverage).

These are:

 ajax communication libraries -- just the communicaiton routines, with little more.

 html/dhtml/vector/js components pre-wired to ajax communication libraries -- GUI widgets that are scripted to do background communication with ajax techniques.

 gui frameworks -- full integrated libraries of interactive gui components that share common methods for data acquisition persistence and communication.  These are sometimes server-centric and at other times client centric as in TIBCO General Interface AJAX Framework offering. 
 
 libraries supported by visual development tools -- ajax authoring today is mostly happening in the real that HTML did at first -- that is the textual code editor.  Visual tools for certain frameworks are emerging.  Here at TIBCO we even build the AJAX tooling using AJAX (in the 3rd quantum state definition of the term) to create the Rich Internet Application IDE we call TIBCO General Interface.


The thing is that while ajax strictly defined may be just the communications aspect, it&#039;s really AJAX + DHTML and Vector rendering capabilities in the browser that provide the possibility to deliver web based applications that can give desktop installed applications a run for their money.

So is AJAX just some of the ingredients in a no-plugins, no-applets, no-active-x, approach to Rich Internet Applications?, or is AJAX a class of Rich Internet Applications unto itself.  Or is it all of the above.

Far as I can tell from a semantic survey of the web (or just ajaxian.com alone), the term has 4 quantum states of being.  Anwser: All of the above.

--Kevin Hakman, TIBCO Software Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I believe Alex is trying to get across stems from a very strict definition of AJAX &#8230; that is AJAX is for asynch communications using javascript and xml.  </p>
<p>The rub though is, as others have pointed out in the past there&#8217;s no D or V in &#8220;AJAX&#8221;.  No DHTML.  No VML.  No SVG.  Really no graphical user interface concept described in the terms underlying the AJAX acronym.  Tighly defined AJAX is just the way to get data to and from the client &#8212; not how it gets displayed.</p>
<p>Accordingly from what I see there are currently four quantum states of the term &#8220;AJAX&#8221; today (all of which are exemplified in ajaxian.com&#8217;s coverage).</p>
<p>These are:</p>
<p> ajax communication libraries &#8212; just the communicaiton routines, with little more.</p>
<p> html/dhtml/vector/js components pre-wired to ajax communication libraries &#8212; GUI widgets that are scripted to do background communication with ajax techniques.</p>
<p> gui frameworks &#8212; full integrated libraries of interactive gui components that share common methods for data acquisition persistence and communication.  These are sometimes server-centric and at other times client centric as in TIBCO General Interface AJAX Framework offering. </p>
<p> libraries supported by visual development tools &#8212; ajax authoring today is mostly happening in the real that HTML did at first &#8212; that is the textual code editor.  Visual tools for certain frameworks are emerging.  Here at TIBCO we even build the AJAX tooling using AJAX (in the 3rd quantum state definition of the term) to create the Rich Internet Application IDE we call TIBCO General Interface.</p>
<p>The thing is that while ajax strictly defined may be just the communications aspect, it&#8217;s really AJAX + DHTML and Vector rendering capabilities in the browser that provide the possibility to deliver web based applications that can give desktop installed applications a run for their money.</p>
<p>So is AJAX just some of the ingredients in a no-plugins, no-applets, no-active-x, approach to Rich Internet Applications?, or is AJAX a class of Rich Internet Applications unto itself.  Or is it all of the above.</p>
<p>Far as I can tell from a semantic survey of the web (or just ajaxian.com alone), the term has 4 quantum states of being.  Anwser: All of the above.</p>
<p>&#8211;Kevin Hakman, TIBCO Software Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Any examples?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any examples?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mahemoff</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mahemoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>Kevin, all true. I don&#039;t know exactly why many equate &quot;Asynchronous Javascript + XML&quot; with &quot;XMLHttpRequest, you rock!&quot;. And more to the point, Ajax was really introduced more than just those technologies anyway.

Saying that, Alex&#039;s points here are mostly quite valid - he&#039;s advising caution on various points, not ruling them out. e.g. Drag-And-Drop is okay for re-ordering lists, but overkill for selecting a boolean value!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, all true. I don&#8217;t know exactly why many equate &#8220;Asynchronous Javascript + XML&#8221; with &#8220;XMLHttpRequest, you rock!&#8221;. And more to the point, Ajax was really introduced more than just those technologies anyway.</p>
<p>Saying that, Alex&#8217;s points here are mostly quite valid &#8211; he&#8217;s advising caution on various points, not ruling them out. e.g. Drag-And-Drop is okay for re-ordering lists, but overkill for selecting a boolean value!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tope</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Tope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>IMHO I disagree with the rule about replacing large text. The reasoning that Alex suggested was, [paraphrased]&quot;if you are going to replace a lot of text, why not just request a whole new page&quot;. I think that in certain cases this is tantamount to giving up instead of pushing a limit here where ajax can be useful, particularly in searches that may take a few seconds due to backend processing.I think ajax is useful here because you can present a loading-progress GIF while the search is taking place, instead of making the user wait with a blank screen or wonder what is going on during the search. I understand many search apps are so fast that there is no downtime, and in that case I&#039;d say, why not just use AJAX instead of why not just request a new page. Alex&#039;s statement seems to infer that making the ajax request is harder than submitting the form, which is just not necessarily true at all if you setup your variables correctly in html.

again just IMHO,
tope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO I disagree with the rule about replacing large text. The reasoning that Alex suggested was, [paraphrased]&#8220;if you are going to replace a lot of text, why not just request a whole new page&#8221;. I think that in certain cases this is tantamount to giving up instead of pushing a limit here where ajax can be useful, particularly in searches that may take a few seconds due to backend processing.I think ajax is useful here because you can present a loading-progress GIF while the search is taking place, instead of making the user wait with a blank screen or wonder what is going on during the search. I understand many search apps are so fast that there is no downtime, and in that case I&#8217;d say, why not just use AJAX instead of why not just request a new page. Alex&#8217;s statement seems to infer that making the ajax request is harder than submitting the form, which is just not necessarily true at all if you setup your variables correctly in html.</p>
<p>again just IMHO,<br />
tope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>&quot;Basic navigation.&quot;

Exactly. I&#039;m amazed whenever I read someone saying how they want to simulate several pages using Ajax. Let&#039;s say you had a 10 page site about widgets. What possible advantage could there be in using Ajax to load the content of each page as opposed to just going to an actual page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Basic navigation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. I&#8217;m amazed whenever I read someone saying how they want to simulate several pages using Ajax. Let&#8217;s say you had a 10 page site about widgets. What possible advantage could there be in using Ajax to load the content of each page as opposed to just going to an actual page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zith</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>zith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>I have seen some very good examples of useull ajax-searches. One is the index search over at  http://docs.gotmono.net/ . Compare finding something in this documentation rather than finding something in a documentation with a navigation interface like this: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/default.aspx .

It&#039;s true that it is very nice to be able to go back to a previous search, but I think there&#039;s a place for both a normal search-&gt;submit-&gt;get a result and a search-&gt;get instant index kind of search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen some very good examples of useull ajax-searches. One is the index search over at  <a href="http://docs.gotmono.net/" rel="nofollow">http://docs.gotmono.net/</a> . Compare finding something in this documentation rather than finding something in a documentation with a navigation interface like this: <a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/default.aspx</a> .</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that it is very nice to be able to go back to a previous search, but I think there&#8217;s a place for both a normal search->submit->get a result and a search->get instant index kind of search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Issac</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Issac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>I am such a n00b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am such a n00b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>Also, you left out, in no case should it break the browser&#039;s back button or &quot;open in new window&quot; in the context menu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, you left out, in no case should it break the browser&#8217;s back button or &#8220;open in new window&#8221; in the context menu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamal</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>Will Ajax not matter anymore, especially once the average internet connection is fast enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Ajax not matter anymore, especially once the average internet connection is fast enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Becker</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>John Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>Yea, one cool thing I have seen is using ajax and flash, for example http://www.audiri.com uses it to integrate its mp3 player into the site, it remembers your play list and you can add to it dynamically</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, one cool thing I have seen is using ajax and flash, for example <a href="http://www.audiri.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.audiri.com</a> uses it to integrate its mp3 player into the site, it remembers your play list and you can add to it dynamically</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny Fleurmond</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny Fleurmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>Forgive my newbishness, but wouldn&#039;t the more rapid user to user communication and you comment on Google involve the server sending info to the client as it updated...can you do that?  I thought you could just send a response after a request from the client?

Once again, sorry if its a newbie question</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my newbishness, but wouldn&#8217;t the more rapid user to user communication and you comment on Google involve the server sending info to the client as it updated&#8230;can you do that?  I thought you could just send a response after a request from the client?</p>
<p>Once again, sorry if its a newbie question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/6-places-you-must-use-ajax#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>You just copied Alex&#039;s entire article, and added a paragraph at the bottom saying that you agree with part and disagree with part?!?  What chutzpah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just copied Alex&#8217;s entire article, and added a paragraph at the bottom saying that you agree with part and disagree with part?!?  What chutzpah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

