Comments on: A Comparison of Ajax Frameworks for ASP.NET

By: sberringer

sberringer — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:04:46 +0000

These are not really frameworks, I would call them technologies. I have wrapped up a bunch of these open source technologies into a framework that gives an ASP.NET developer a starting point for building an AJAX app. See http://easyframe.sberringer.net. It’s open source.

By: ASP.NET AJAX library that impressed me

ASP.NET AJAX library that impressed me — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:59:17 +0000

They have left out a lot of interesting frameworks and libraries. For example since April I’m heavily using Ajaxium – a component which makes whole ASP.NET pages with all controls AJAX-ed (I mean really all control – my own, infragistics’ controls I’ve downloaded from codeproject). Also comparison misses a lot of important features – what about AJAX-ed navigation from one ASP.NET page to another? Is it impossible for most of frameworks and so omitted? What about smart downgrade to the old ASP.NET for old browsers and search spiders?
Take a look at this AJAX ASP.NET library, I think you’ll find it interesting as I did months ago.
Wulf Menger

By: David

David — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:06:16 +0000

zumiPage – The most easiest and powerful AJAX for ASP.NET

http://www.zumipage.com

By: Loniya

Loniya — Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:40:55 +0000

Ajax.Net is the framework that I am using as of now. Recenlty read about Anthem.net, will look into that too. Right now I ma using ajax to build a rating system similar to the one of this page.

By: Les Papier

Les Papier — Wed, 17 May 2006 22:09:15 +0000

Add one more to the Ajax nuts and bolts mix:
Telerik has released the first third-party component suite offering support for the Microsoft “Atlas” Framework.

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:29:54 +0000

Yah they left out Anthem.Net (which is FREE) by Jason Diamond.

I found a new community set up for it at: http://www.anthemdotnet.com/

I’d say download the controls and try them out! Great simplicity and yet still very robust …

By: Troels Wittrup Jensen

Troels Wittrup Jensen — Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:36:37 +0000

1. You can program everything in whatever server-side language and model you prefer.
2. You don’t need to write web services.
3. You don’t need to write DHTML.
4. The framework is very light-weight (~10K).

By: Sergi

Sergi — Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:22:47 +0000

What are the advantages of these frameworks against prototype with some extensions?

By: Iwan Memruk

Iwan Memruk — Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:40:38 +0000

You could use a framework to avoid dealing with low-level XmlHttpRequests and therefore have more time to spend on your business logic.

By: Mikael Bergkvist

Mikael Bergkvist — Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:43:24 +0000

This is stupid.
Ajax is dead simple, who the hell needs a framework?

By: onbrain.wordpress.com » Blog Archive » link 2006-02-06

onbrain.wordpress.com » Blog Archive » link 2006-02-06 — Sun, 05 Feb 2006 23:10:24 +0000

[...] Ajaxian Â» A Comparison of Ajax Frameworks for ASP.NET [...]

By: kev

kev — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:10:40 +0000

Interesting. Note, they left out Anthem ( http://anthem-dot-net.sourceforge.net/ ). Now if I could only decide which of these asp.net ajax framework meets my needs (ajax.net, anthem, atlas) and how to integrate the other great functionality found it other ajax frameworks, toolkits (dojo, scriptilicious, etc).