<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Number of Ajax Security Items</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: df</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items/comment-page-1#comment-255207</link>
		<dc:creator>df</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items#comment-255207</guid>
		<description>fddddd

df
df
df
df</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fddddd</p>
<p>df<br />
df<br />
df<br />
df</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.R.Wolff</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items/comment-page-1#comment-59774</link>
		<dc:creator>A.R.Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items#comment-59774</guid>
		<description>Again, we see a current buzz word masking the real news story. Ajax doesn&#039;t cause the vulnerabilities Hoffman (and, presumably others) describe; allowing arbitrary users to post arbitrary HTML does. Of course a person who can inject HTML into a remote site can do bad things -- from inappropriate IMG tags, to bad IFRAMES, to the type of XHR attack Hoffman proposed. The popularity of Ajax techniques lowers the bar for malicious code writers, but a site like MySpace -- or even a blog comments section -- allowing John Q. Public to write HTML has always been a bad idea, regardless thereof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, we see a current buzz word masking the real news story. Ajax doesn&#8217;t cause the vulnerabilities Hoffman (and, presumably others) describe; allowing arbitrary users to post arbitrary HTML does. Of course a person who can inject HTML into a remote site can do bad things &#8212; from inappropriate IMG tags, to bad IFRAMES, to the type of XHR attack Hoffman proposed. The popularity of Ajax techniques lowers the bar for malicious code writers, but a site like MySpace &#8212; or even a blog comments section &#8212; allowing John Q. Public to write HTML has always been a bad idea, regardless thereof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonKolb.com</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items/comment-page-1#comment-59471</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonKolb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/a-number-of-ajax-security-items#comment-59471</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.0 and AJAX Security Vulnerabilities&lt;/strong&gt;

Ajaxian has a post about some sessions at the Black Hat USA 2006 conference. I&#039;m quite honestly surprised that this is just gaining some press now, I&#039;ve figured it would happen sooner than it has (but that&#039;s typical for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.0 and AJAX Security Vulnerabilities</strong></p>
<p>Ajaxian has a post about some sessions at the Black Hat USA 2006 conference. I&#8217;m quite honestly surprised that this is just gaining some press now, I&#8217;ve figured it would happen sooner than it has (but that&#8217;s typical for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

