<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ActionMonkey: Getting rid of the spiders in the browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Resig</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-253076</link>
		<dc:creator>John Resig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser#comment-253076</guid>
		<description>@Mark: You&#039;re in luck - all of that is slated to be in Firefox 3 (both support for JSONRequest and support for cross-domain XMLHttpRequest).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark: You&#8217;re in luck &#8211; all of that is slated to be in Firefox 3 (both support for JSONRequest and support for cross-domain XMLHttpRequest).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmen</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-253069</link>
		<dc:creator>carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser#comment-253069</guid>
		<description>has anyone benchmarked luaJIT vs Tamarin? seeing as the difference between Lua and JS is basically &quot;we call objects &#039;tables&#039;&quot;  and we&#039;re &quot;made in brazil&quot; vs &quot;made in silly valley&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has anyone benchmarked luaJIT vs Tamarin? seeing as the difference between Lua and JS is basically &#8220;we call objects &#8216;tables&#8217;&#8221;  and we&#8217;re &#8220;made in brazil&#8221; vs &#8220;made in silly valley&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl G</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-253063</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser#comment-253063</guid>
		<description>There are actually changes being checked into the trees, which is always exciting. Jason Orendorff actually is updating his blog[1] fairly often if you want to keep track of progress.

[1] http://blog.mozilla.com/jorendorff/

The trace trees paper mentioned on the actionmonkey wiki page is extremely interesting. If I understand it correctly, it also seems like you could get good JIT compilation of untyped code simply by treating an untyped assignment like a &#039;bc&#039; instruction mentioned in the example given in paper.

Based on the perf numbers in the paper and the numbers coming from adobe, the 10x speedup of untyped js doesn&#039;t seem as farfetched as the IE js guys made it sound in their interview a couple months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are actually changes being checked into the trees, which is always exciting. Jason Orendorff actually is updating his blog[1] fairly often if you want to keep track of progress.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/jorendorff/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mozilla.com/jorendorff/</a></p>
<p>The trace trees paper mentioned on the actionmonkey wiki page is extremely interesting. If I understand it correctly, it also seems like you could get good JIT compilation of untyped code simply by treating an untyped assignment like a &#8216;bc&#8217; instruction mentioned in the example given in paper.</p>
<p>Based on the perf numbers in the paper and the numbers coming from adobe, the 10x speedup of untyped js doesn&#8217;t seem as farfetched as the IE js guys made it sound in their interview a couple months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G. Paul</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-253059</link>
		<dc:creator>David G. Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser#comment-253059</guid>
		<description>awesome monkey. w00t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome monkey. w00t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Holton</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-253058</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Holton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/actionmonkey-getting-rid-of-the-spiders-in-the-browser#comment-253058</guid>
		<description>...it&#039;ll be interesting to see the performance increases that JIT compiler from Tamarin brings.  Can&#039;t wait to see that evolve.  Great to hear some news about this

(sidenote: would really like to see support for Crockford&#039;s JSONRequest.js and secure/supported XSS in a not-too-distant release of FF... hopeful to hear some news from Mozilla/FF about that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;it&#8217;ll be interesting to see the performance increases that JIT compiler from Tamarin brings.  Can&#8217;t wait to see that evolve.  Great to hear some news about this</p>
<p>(sidenote: would really like to see support for Crockford&#8217;s JSONRequest.js and secure/supported XSS in a not-too-distant release of FF&#8230; hopeful to hear some news from Mozilla/FF about that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

