<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Engage: Apollo as Web+ rather than Desktop-</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247780</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247780</guid>
		<description>I think that Apollo &lt;strong&gt;could&lt;/strong&gt; be an incredible step forward, if it is close to what Adobe is claiming it is. The thing I notice is that so far no one is looking past what this will do for existing sites. Even Adobe does not seem to see the full power in this (the ebay demo is pretty worthless in my opinion). What I am interested in is the entire new breed of applications this would create. I mean this is the first hint of a web application crossing a threshold to actually move closer towards the application label. The idea of interaction with local and web content seamlessly is what will make this the killer app and the next step forward.  Come on Adobe let us have a beta of this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Apollo <strong>could</strong> be an incredible step forward, if it is close to what Adobe is claiming it is. The thing I notice is that so far no one is looking past what this will do for existing sites. Even Adobe does not seem to see the full power in this (the ebay demo is pretty worthless in my opinion). What I am interested in is the entire new breed of applications this would create. I mean this is the first hint of a web application crossing a threshold to actually move closer towards the application label. The idea of interaction with local and web content seamlessly is what will make this the killer app and the next step forward.  Come on Adobe let us have a beta of this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Holton</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Holton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 08:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247736</guid>
		<description>...I think Apollo is going to be huge.  A great tech that definitely has its place in e-commerce, and plenty of real market value to be delivered, with a low bar of adoption to web developers.  Can&#039;t wait to see it all unfold, and start utilizing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I think Apollo is going to be huge.  A great tech that definitely has its place in e-commerce, and plenty of real market value to be delivered, with a low bar of adoption to web developers.  Can&#8217;t wait to see it all unfold, and start utilizing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jii</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247697</guid>
		<description>the only loser here will be swing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only loser here will be swing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boyd</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247692</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 05:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247692</guid>
		<description>hmmm abstract as much as possible, but allow for native stuff if it makes much difference e.g. for printing, networking.  id imagine that there will be quite a few intranet style apps made for this, which basically means Windows only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm abstract as much as possible, but allow for native stuff if it makes much difference e.g. for printing, networking.  id imagine that there will be quite a few intranet style apps made for this, which basically means Windows only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kuhnert</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247690</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kuhnert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 05:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247690</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;m tired of seeing square pane desktop applications. If it brings a new fleet of these our way then &quot;thanks but no thanks&quot;....but Flash was never a square box experience for me in the past. ...I suppose if it didn&#039;t suck dev wise it has lots of potential. 

The last thing we want to do is bring the &quot;web to the desktop&quot; in the same stupid way we&#039;ve brought the desktop to the web. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m tired of seeing square pane desktop applications. If it brings a new fleet of these our way then &#8220;thanks but no thanks&#8221;&#8230;.but Flash was never a square box experience for me in the past. &#8230;I suppose if it didn&#8217;t suck dev wise it has lots of potential. </p>
<p>The last thing we want to do is bring the &#8220;web to the desktop&#8221; in the same stupid way we&#8217;ve brought the desktop to the web. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Christian</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247689</guid>
		<description>What I find exciting about Apollo is being able to use web technologies (html, flash, actionscript) outside of the browser. I sick of worrying about the back button. I want a new metaphor instead of the document traversal that we are forced to adhere to with browser based applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find exciting about Apollo is being able to use web technologies (html, flash, actionscript) outside of the browser. I sick of worrying about the back button. I want a new metaphor instead of the document traversal that we are forced to adhere to with browser based applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Neuberg</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247683</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Neuberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247683</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested in knowing how people compare something like Adobe Apollo with Dojo Offline? Is a small, focused, open source approach like Dojo Offline valuable to you, or is something like Adobe Apollo more what you need? Disclosure: SitePen and I are the developers of Dojo Offline.

Best,
  Brad Neuberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in knowing how people compare something like Adobe Apollo with Dojo Offline? Is a small, focused, open source approach like Dojo Offline valuable to you, or is something like Adobe Apollo more what you need? Disclosure: SitePen and I are the developers of Dojo Offline.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
  Brad Neuberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boodie</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247674</link>
		<dc:creator>boodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247674</guid>
		<description>how can a site about ajax have no ajax in it? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can a site about ajax have no ajax in it? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Rauscher</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-engage-apollo-as-web-rather-than-desktop/comment-page-1#comment-247671</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Rauscher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2163#comment-247671</guid>
		<description>I think we should be allowd to do native interactions.  I know we won&#039;t be able too, but it would be cool let say to import a list of song locations from iTunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should be allowd to do native interactions.  I know we won&#8217;t be able too, but it would be cool let say to import a list of song locations from iTunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

