<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe lifts SWF/FLV restrictions and creates Open Screen Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-lifts-swfflv-restrictions-and-creates-open-screen-project/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-lifts-swfflv-restrictions-and-creates-open-screen-project</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slightlyoff</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-lifts-swfflv-restrictions-and-creates-open-screen-project/comment-page-1#comment-263295</link>
		<dc:creator>slightlyoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-lifts-swfflv-restrictions-and-creates-open-screen-project#comment-263295</guid>
		<description>Jordan:

Hell is still quite warm, thanks. H.264 encoding/decoding is still encumbered, the ON2 codecs can&#039;t be OSS&#039;d, Adobe still controls the distribution channel for &quot;official&quot; Flash, and it&#039;s not clear to what extent this announcement will allow Adobe&#039;s &quot;partners&quot; in this (let alone ye-old hacker) to help define the direction of the product. Opening up specs in no way changes how they&#039;re created, who has a seat at the table, and how they&#039;re evolved. If Adobe still holds all those cards, well...they still hold all the cards ;-)

I&#039;d argue that a &quot;wait and see&quot; approach is firmly warranted until Adobe *also* throws more of the flags that would indicate a real willingness to work as a peer with this nascent community and not as the single source of truth.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan:</p>
<p>Hell is still quite warm, thanks. H.264 encoding/decoding is still encumbered, the ON2 codecs can&#8217;t be OSS&#8217;d, Adobe still controls the distribution channel for &#8220;official&#8221; Flash, and it&#8217;s not clear to what extent this announcement will allow Adobe&#8217;s &#8220;partners&#8221; in this (let alone ye-old hacker) to help define the direction of the product. Opening up specs in no way changes how they&#8217;re created, who has a seat at the table, and how they&#8217;re evolved. If Adobe still holds all those cards, well&#8230;they still hold all the cards ;-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d argue that a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; approach is firmly warranted until Adobe *also* throws more of the flags that would indicate a real willingness to work as a peer with this nascent community and not as the single source of truth.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-lifts-swfflv-restrictions-and-creates-open-screen-project/comment-page-1#comment-263284</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/adobe-lifts-swfflv-restrictions-and-creates-open-screen-project#comment-263284</guid>
		<description>Hell just froze over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell just froze over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

