<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax applications and SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-251828</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo#comment-251828</guid>
		<description>Basic or no, It&#039;s still good advise to get and to heed. I did some consulting work on a large web-based &quot;Outlook&quot; application, after the original devs had already got the major thrust of the site working. The application is completely dependent on Javascript, instead of simply being enhanced by it. Luckily it could be considered an &quot;extranet&quot; so some environment requirements could be imposed on the people using it, but it made me wonder how many developers who include Ajaxian techniques in their front -end do in fact take the time needed to plan the site out in &quot;analog&quot; first, before jumping into the scripting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic or no, It&#8217;s still good advise to get and to heed. I did some consulting work on a large web-based &#8220;Outlook&#8221; application, after the original devs had already got the major thrust of the site working. The application is completely dependent on Javascript, instead of simply being enhanced by it. Luckily it could be considered an &#8220;extranet&#8221; so some environment requirements could be imposed on the people using it, but it made me wonder how many developers who include Ajaxian techniques in their front -end do in fact take the time needed to plan the site out in &#8220;analog&#8221; first, before jumping into the scripting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-251789</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo#comment-251789</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really basis of a nice web dev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really basis of a nice web dev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelle</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-251780</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo#comment-251780</guid>
		<description>Why use a different webbrowser? Just choose &quot;no style&quot; in the submeny &quot;page style&quot; in the &quot;view&quot;-menu in Firefox - don&#039;t know if that&#039;s the exact words because my FF is swedish...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why use a different webbrowser? Just choose &#8220;no style&#8221; in the submeny &#8220;page style&#8221; in the &#8220;view&#8221;-menu in Firefox &#8211; don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s the exact words because my FF is swedish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Scherzinger</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-251764</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Scherzinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo#comment-251764</guid>
		<description>This is really &quot;basics of web dev&quot;
Using JavaScript in an unobtrusive way is first of all a design thing and SEO is a nice side effect. I agrre with Gaz Elms&#039;s opinion regarding Rich McIver&#039;s findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really &#8220;basics of web dev&#8221;<br />
Using JavaScript in an unobtrusive way is first of all a design thing and SEO is a nice side effect. I agrre with Gaz Elms&#8217;s opinion regarding Rich McIver&#8217;s findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaz Elms</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-251762</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaz Elms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-applications-and-seo#comment-251762</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this just a list of basics?

If you want maximum reach your website needs to work without javascript, without style, without images and with accessible markup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this just a list of basics?</p>
<p>If you want maximum reach your website needs to work without javascript, without style, without images and with accessible markup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

