<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax Framework Comparison Chart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Cleaver</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart/comment-page-1#comment-246559</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Cleaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart#comment-246559</guid>
		<description>How about comparing tk with the echo2 widget set?

I&#039;m thinking about porting a tcltk app to aejaks.

Thanks, Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about comparing tk with the echo2 widget set?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking about porting a tcltk app to aejaks.</p>
<p>Thanks, Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fereira</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart/comment-page-1#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart#comment-744</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about the feature list comparison.  At the very bottom it indicates that the WebORB standard edition is free but the Pro edition is $799.  It doesn&#039;t indicate whether the both the std. and pro editions have all of the features listed in the comparison chart.  If the standard edition has a subset of features of the pro edition the comparison chart is very misleading.  If the feature set is the same why would anyone buy the pro edition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about the feature list comparison.  At the very bottom it indicates that the WebORB standard edition is free but the Pro edition is $799.  It doesn&#8217;t indicate whether the both the std. and pro editions have all of the features listed in the comparison chart.  If the standard edition has a subset of features of the pro edition the comparison chart is very misleading.  If the feature set is the same why would anyone buy the pro edition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Nisenbaum</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart/comment-page-1#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Nisenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

It is a valid point. We updated the page to reflect which features are available in the Professional edition of WebORB.

thanks,
Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>It is a valid point. We updated the page to reflect which features are available in the Professional edition of WebORB.</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bram Smeets</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart/comment-page-1#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram Smeets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart#comment-746</guid>
		<description>They are definitely biased so is their comparison.
I think it&#039;s ok to use these &quot;schemes&quot; as a marketing strategy, but I just think it shouldn&#039;t be presented as a real comparison.

However I&#039;m biased too, but towards DWR. I think multiple points of the DWR features are incomplete like for example: &#039;Supports custom serializers&#039;. DWR certainly supports custom serializers. There are more of these &quot;inaccuracies&quot;, but I think Joe Walker send in a listing... Curious to see what they do with that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are definitely biased so is their comparison.<br />
I think it&#8217;s ok to use these &#8220;schemes&#8221; as a marketing strategy, but I just think it shouldn&#8217;t be presented as a real comparison.</p>
<p>However I&#8217;m biased too, but towards DWR. I think multiple points of the DWR features are incomplete like for example: &#8216;Supports custom serializers&#8217;. DWR certainly supports custom serializers. There are more of these &#8220;inaccuracies&#8221;, but I think Joe Walker send in a listing&#8230; Curious to see what they do with that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DivByZero</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart/comment-page-1#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>DivByZero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-framework-comparison-chart#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Why compare Sajax instead of CPAINT or others ? Sajax is dead I think, they&#039;ve released 10 versions in 10 days and then stopped releasing anything :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why compare Sajax instead of CPAINT or others ? Sajax is dead I think, they&#8217;ve released 10 versions in 10 days and then stopped releasing anything :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

