Comments on: Ajax Survey III http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: Jack Gordon http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259897 Jack Gordon Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:58:36 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259897 yes I wrote in spry also. People overlook spry maybe because it's not community driven, but it is well worth using it if just for the datasets.. saved me hours and hours yes I wrote in spry also. People overlook spry maybe because it’s not community driven, but it is well worth using it if just for the datasets.. saved me hours and hours

]]> By: Olmo Maldonado http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259896 Olmo Maldonado Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:23:45 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259896 It could of been as simple as.. "what do you use?" And throw at you 100+ things. ;D Then again that wouldn't have been very useful now would it? I'm sure once the survey is done they'll categorize everything for you. It could of been as simple as.. “what do you use?”

And throw at you 100+ things. ;D Then again that wouldn’t have been very useful now would it? I’m sure once the survey is done they’ll categorize everything for you.

]]> By: Kevin Hoyt http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259895 Kevin Hoyt Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:11:45 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259895 "Other:" for Spry here ... Bummer. “Other:” for Spry here … Bummer.

]]> By: DarkRat http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259894 DarkRat Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:48:32 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259894 "There should only be 20 ‘frameworks’ listed." yea, but than every fanboy would say "OMG! how could you forget $randomframework? the survey sucks!" “There should only be 20 ‘frameworks’ listed.”

yea, but than every fanboy would say “OMG! how could you forget $randomframework? the survey sucks!”

]]> By: Paul Irish http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259893 Paul Irish Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:45:26 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259893 This list of frameworks is kind of infuriating. "Fade Anything Technique", "CakePHP", and "jQuery" don't belong in the same group. Not to mention you're throwing every kitchen sink I've ever seen at this list. Chill out. There should only be 20 'frameworks' listed. This list of frameworks is kind of infuriating. “Fade Anything Technique”, “CakePHP”, and “jQuery” don’t belong in the same group.
Not to mention you’re throwing every kitchen sink I’ve ever seen at this list. Chill out. There should only be 20 ‘frameworks’ listed.

]]> By: Marc http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259892 Marc Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:54:19 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259892 @Nameless: I have to agree. Sometimes I use the raw XMLHttpObject due to environment requirements, but I also use frameworks when possible. @Nameless: I have to agree. Sometimes I use the raw XMLHttpObject due to environment requirements, but I also use frameworks when possible.

]]> By: Mike Wilcox http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259890 Mike Wilcox Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:05:10 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259890 What the...? No real time results using Comet? What the…? No real time results using Comet?

]]> By: Nameless http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259888 Nameless Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:47:17 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259888 First option in question 3 should ONLY says: "I use XmlHttpObject directly.". Why can't one use the raw XmlHttpObject with the Walter Zorn Drag-and-drop library for example? Or even with some framework/library that includes a wrapper for XmlHttpObject. First option in question 3 should ONLY says: “I use XmlHttpObject directly.”. Why can’t one use the raw XmlHttpObject with the Walter Zorn Drag-and-drop library for example? Or even with some framework/library that includes a wrapper for XmlHttpObject.

]]> By: DarkRat http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259886 DarkRat Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:15:52 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259886 wow. overkill of frameworks wow. overkill of frameworks

]]> By: Marc http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259885 Marc Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:02:45 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259885 I don't consider <a href="http://cakephp.org" rel="nofollow">CakePHP</a> an Ajax framework, but I put it down anyway even though I don't use any of its Ajax capabilities (it uses prototype so I just override its functions with jQuery). I'm <em>very interested</em> in seeing the results of this survey. I don’t consider CakePHP an Ajax framework, but I put it down anyway even though I don’t use any of its Ajax capabilities (it uses prototype so I just override its functions with jQuery).

I’m very interested in seeing the results of this survey.

]]> By: Jon Hartmann http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii/comment-page-1#comment-259881 Jon Hartmann Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:15:11 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax-survey-iii#comment-259881 That sure is a crazy list of frameworks. That sure is a crazy list of frameworks.

]]>