<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax3D &#8211; the Next Arc up the Hype Curve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-213930</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-213930</guid>
		<description>Also, Flux has fixed some bugs and added features, and those examples will run with very slight mods in two or three different X3D players in both IE and Ff, and getting better all the time. Yes it is real Ajax and yes it is real 3D. Tony was indeed brave and very considerate to the 3D community in hanging that out there. For somebody getting in to it, the SAI (the X3D DOM) is well documented in the standards at web3d.org. However, as in any developing browser, it may be tough to figure out exactly which of the interfaces are actually there. 
Thanks,
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Flux has fixed some bugs and added features, and those examples will run with very slight mods in two or three different X3D players in both IE and Ff, and getting better all the time. Yes it is real Ajax and yes it is real 3D. Tony was indeed brave and very considerate to the 3D community in hanging that out there. For somebody getting in to it, the SAI (the X3D DOM) is well documented in the standards at web3d.org. However, as in any developing browser, it may be tough to figure out exactly which of the interfaces are actually there.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-65008</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-65008</guid>
		<description>Say what you like about VRML I guess. &quot;Because VRML was so great the first time aroundâ€¦&quot;. That&#039;s a criticism with no substance. VRML is a 3D file format that is still widely supported by many CAD, 3D Modeling, and Laser Scan data packages. If you&#039;re going to criticize, at least post some reasons and not something you&#039;ve heard from someone else.

That said, X3D addresses many of the disired features that VRML was missing. The version of the spec under review now includes support layering/overlays, particles effects, and rigid body physics.

What VRML did do right was 3D for the masses, it allowed alot of us to get into 3D at a low cost, which would not have otherwise been possible. I&#039;m an archaeologist by education. That&#039;s the beauty of X3D, tools are out there that are open source, from plug-ins to Maya and Max, to the completely open source Blender. X3D is still 3D for masses, ECMAScripting (for all of us programming challenged folks) and all the graphics power you could hope for. If you don&#039;t believe me, check out the X3D based game Cosmic Birdie from IMILabs.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you like about VRML I guess. &#8220;Because VRML was so great the first time aroundâ€¦&#8221;. That&#8217;s a criticism with no substance. VRML is a 3D file format that is still widely supported by many CAD, 3D Modeling, and Laser Scan data packages. If you&#8217;re going to criticize, at least post some reasons and not something you&#8217;ve heard from someone else.</p>
<p>That said, X3D addresses many of the disired features that VRML was missing. The version of the spec under review now includes support layering/overlays, particles effects, and rigid body physics.</p>
<p>What VRML did do right was 3D for the masses, it allowed alot of us to get into 3D at a low cost, which would not have otherwise been possible. I&#8217;m an archaeologist by education. That&#8217;s the beauty of X3D, tools are out there that are open source, from plug-ins to Maya and Max, to the completely open source Blender. X3D is still 3D for masses, ECMAScripting (for all of us programming challenged folks) and all the graphics power you could hope for. If you don&#8217;t believe me, check out the X3D based game Cosmic Birdie from IMILabs.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJP</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-64211</link>
		<dc:creator>AJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-64211</guid>
		<description>Hmm, Worlds of Warcraft has millions of members - on a proprietary platform. Second Life has doubled in membership the last few months - on a proprietary platform. What if the Web/HTML was proprietary? It&#039;d be a nice community with pretty great stuff - but not everywhere, all the time, added to by anyone who had the guts and chops. The argument about 3D is over folks - Xbox, PlayStation - we all have grown up with it and play in it most every day. Glad to see that it&#039;s now possible on the Web. Very cool and gutsy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, Worlds of Warcraft has millions of members &#8211; on a proprietary platform. Second Life has doubled in membership the last few months &#8211; on a proprietary platform. What if the Web/HTML was proprietary? It&#8217;d be a nice community with pretty great stuff &#8211; but not everywhere, all the time, added to by anyone who had the guts and chops. The argument about 3D is over folks &#8211; Xbox, PlayStation &#8211; we all have grown up with it and play in it most every day. Glad to see that it&#8217;s now possible on the Web. Very cool and gutsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viveka</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-64150</link>
		<dc:creator>Viveka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-64150</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s Asynchronous Javascript and it&#039;s XML-encoded 3D, so I don&#039;t know what else you&#039;d call it other than AJAX3D. AJAX describes the use of XMLHttpRequest with Javascript, and that&#039;s what&#039;s going on here. What&#039;s your issue? If you&#039;re not a 3D person, then I can see that you might not care about this, but to me it looks pretty damn sweet and it&#039;s certainly not an incorrect use of the term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s Asynchronous Javascript and it&#8217;s XML-encoded 3D, so I don&#8217;t know what else you&#8217;d call it other than AJAX3D. AJAX describes the use of XMLHttpRequest with Javascript, and that&#8217;s what&#8217;s going on here. What&#8217;s your issue? If you&#8217;re not a 3D person, then I can see that you might not care about this, but to me it looks pretty damn sweet and it&#8217;s certainly not an incorrect use of the term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Parisi</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-64104</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Parisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-64104</guid>
		<description>Hi folks,

Just a little information in response to various comments:

1) Dietrich - there is indeed accompanying text for the tutorials. However it was posted only yesterday. Sorry for the confusion.

2) Mark - r/e the &quot;Trademark&quot;  - the intent there is that this trademark will be controlled by the (non-profit) organization that forms around ajax3d.org. There is no formal organization in place but we already have a mailing list of about 50 people interested in participating, mostly generated from a Birds of a Feather SIGGRAPH session I ran last week. We are going to grow the group organically.

3) Alexei - it *is* really Ajax and it *does* work in IE 6 and Firefox. So I&#039;m not sure what you are talking about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks,</p>
<p>Just a little information in response to various comments:</p>
<p>1) Dietrich &#8211; there is indeed accompanying text for the tutorials. However it was posted only yesterday. Sorry for the confusion.</p>
<p>2) Mark &#8211; r/e the &#8220;Trademark&#8221;  &#8211; the intent there is that this trademark will be controlled by the (non-profit) organization that forms around ajax3d.org. There is no formal organization in place but we already have a mailing list of about 50 people interested in participating, mostly generated from a Birds of a Feather SIGGRAPH session I ran last week. We are going to grow the group organically.</p>
<p>3) Alexei &#8211; it *is* really Ajax and it *does* work in IE 6 and Firefox. So I&#8217;m not sure what you are talking about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexei</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-62923</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 03:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-62923</guid>
		<description>Wow.. that is so not even kindof really Ajax it blows my mind. Also, it didn&#039;t work in IE 6 or Firefox (well. being VRML I&#039;m not surprised).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.. that is so not even kindof really Ajax it blows my mind. Also, it didn&#8217;t work in IE 6 or Firefox (well. being VRML I&#8217;m not surprised).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Earth Orbit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The &#8216;return&#8217; of 3D</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-62873</link>
		<dc:creator>High Earth Orbit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The &#8216;return&#8217; of 3D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-62873</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajaxian has an article discussing the press release and code for ajax3d.org. Looking at the comments, it&#8217;s funny to see people disdain the return of 3D to the web. Following history, 3D web technology is following the standard &#8220;hype cycle&#8221;: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajaxian has an article discussing the press release and code for ajax3d.org. Looking at the comments, it&#8217;s funny to see people disdain the return of 3D to the web. Following history, 3D web technology is following the standard &#8220;hype cycle&#8221;: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Turner</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-62865</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-62865</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny to see people disdain the return of 3D to the web. It&#039;s a standard &quot;hype cycle&quot;:
1. &quot;Technology Trigger&quot;
2. &quot;Peak of Inflated Expectations&quot;
3. &quot;Trough of Disillusionment&quot;
4. &quot;Slope of Enlightenment&quot;
5. &quot;Plateau of Productivity&quot;

Where 3D technology is now getting to the points of &#039;enlightenment&#039;. Bandwidth is high, machines are fast, people are using technology for ever-increasing amount of their activites. They want to explore, interact. Anyways, 3D still has a future - altered realities, virtual realities, physical-space interaction, etc. 

As for the term, if you actually split it apart, it makes sense: &quot;Asyncronous Javascript And X3D&quot;. It&#039;s like flying through GoogleEarth and having 3D object downloaded as you approach the area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny to see people disdain the return of 3D to the web. It&#8217;s a standard &#8220;hype cycle&#8221;:<br />
1. &#8220;Technology Trigger&#8221;<br />
2. &#8220;Peak of Inflated Expectations&#8221;<br />
3. &#8220;Trough of Disillusionment&#8221;<br />
4. &#8220;Slope of Enlightenment&#8221;<br />
5. &#8220;Plateau of Productivity&#8221;</p>
<p>Where 3D technology is now getting to the points of &#8216;enlightenment&#8217;. Bandwidth is high, machines are fast, people are using technology for ever-increasing amount of their activites. They want to explore, interact. Anyways, 3D still has a future &#8211; altered realities, virtual realities, physical-space interaction, etc. </p>
<p>As for the term, if you actually split it apart, it makes sense: &#8220;Asyncronous Javascript And X3D&#8221;. It&#8217;s like flying through GoogleEarth and having 3D object downloaded as you approach the area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl G</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-62382</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-62382</guid>
		<description>Because VRML was so great the first time around...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because VRML was so great the first time around&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kourge</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-62035</link>
		<dc:creator>kourge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-62035</guid>
		<description>Ajax, it seems, is slowly degenerating into a term solely used to generate hype for various web products.
Look at ajaxWrite. It&#039;s XUL-based, and it&#039;s not even Ajax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajax, it seems, is slowly degenerating into a term solely used to generate hype for various web products.<br />
Look at ajaxWrite. It&#8217;s XUL-based, and it&#8217;s not even Ajax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubris Sonic</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-61959</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubris Sonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-61959</guid>
		<description>oh no... not the 3D people....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh no&#8230; not the 3D people&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wubben</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve/comment-page-1#comment-61946</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wubben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajax3d-the-next-arc-up-the-hype-curve#comment-61946</guid>
		<description>Hey, it&#039;s &quot;trademarked&quot;, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it&#8217;s &#8220;trademarked&#8221;, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

