Comments on: Ajaxed: Ajax for classic ASP

By: jenny625

jenny625 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:31:52 +0000

tiffany rings tiffany rings tiffany engagement rings tiffany engagement rings tiffany wedding rings tiffany wedding rings tiffany necklace tiffany necklace tiffany sets tiffany sets tiffany bracelet tiffany bracelet tiffany pendant tiffany pendant tiffany earrings tiffany earrings tiffany accessories tiffany accessories tiffany charms tiffany charms Abercrombie Jeans Abercrombie Jeans Abercrombie Pants Abercrombie Pants Abercrombie Tees Abercrombie Tees Abercrombie Shorts Abercrombie Shorts Abercrombie Sweater Abercrombie Sweater Abercrombie Outerwear Abercrombie Outerwear Abercrombie Hoodies Abercrombie Hoodies Abercrombie Polo Abercrombie Polo Abercrombie ShirtsAbercrombie Shirts abercrombie henleys crew abercrombie henleys crew hollister hollister hollister uk hollister uk abercrombie mens abercrombie mens abercrombie womens abercrombie womens Ruehl 925 Ruehl 925 ed hardy ed hardy shamwow shamwow nest match nest match

By: hanlyone

hanlyone — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:31:10 +0000

Excellent post,interesting article,thanks for sharing. Gucci Handbags gucci replica handbags gucci women boots Thanks!

By: digithings00

digithings00 — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:49:13 +0000

I could not agree more about what is being said about ASP. I hired a .NET programmer for a fairly simple project that should have taken about 2 months. 6 months later, the guy (supposedly quite good) was still pointing and clicking and delivering nothing. My client getting really impatient, I had to get down to business and tried to fix the mess. After 6 hours of looking at useless (mostly automatically generated) code, I bit the bullet and re-wrote the app from scratch in Classic ASP in about 3 weeks. BTW: I liked .Net but only for large corporations where the benefit of corporate-wide standards and re-usable components outweight the complexity. So big corps can have talented designers coming up with the real stuff and code-monkeys pointing and clicking all day, re-using the components.
Just in case you need a quick leg-up on JS-based AJAX, you can pick up a free library on our web site: http://www.digitalthings.net/techforum.htm

By: wuwei

wuwei — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:36:42 +0000

Why not both? Becausegucci handbags the industry has evolved--for the worse.I grew up listening to gucci walletsa balance of rap music. It was easy to admire replica gucci handbagsthe "street knowledge" of NWA, alongside the bass-shaking of 2gucci trolleys Live Crew and edutainment of KRS-One. Sometimescheap wedding dresses you could find it all in one effort.

By: sarqdaniel

sarqdaniel — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:55:58 +0000

Yes, ASP still out there. Check out this new ASP CMS
http://www.dmxready.com/dmxreadyv2/index.asp?page=catalog&product=cms

By: dylanj

dylanj — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:23:39 +0000

I’m just commenting about the “Valid XHTML and CSS” thing at the bottom of this page. It’s a load of rubbish – go to validator.w3.org and enter the URL of this page.

Anyway, yes. Classic ASP is still going – “I keep checking and they just keep piling on more layers of the stuff” – Exactly :)

By: mikenz

mikenz — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:38:11 +0000

@Kressilac – i have a large system running on Server 2008 in classic ASP and it runs sweet. The only thing i can’t get to work is CDONTS (no particular reason for using cdonts, but hey it ran ok for 8 years).
Interesting you say .net is quicker but i can’t really see how .net can be quicker to develop under unless you don’t need to customise any aspects of your UI. Anything slightly different seems to require a whole different approach.

By: mikenz

mikenz — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:28:10 +0000

Yeah ASP rocks!! I’ve got several sites and large systems still working great and still easy to modify that are 7 years old or so.

I’ve realised latetly i think it might be precisely because microsoft STOPPED adding features to ASP that everything still works!

I can’t image what maintenance and upgrade nightmares i would have had if i had chosen to use the then flavour of the month .NET 1.0 – man that was real pile of shite. I keep checking and they just keep piling on more layers of the stuff….

By: dylanj

dylanj — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 07:53:25 +0000

Yay for classic asp! :)

By: Johnny82

Johnny82 — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:34:32 +0000

.NET full of problems as a web develop tool, not like PHP or JSP.
Make project then solution (day is over)
Make classes and redit some classes (day is over)
I’m in vacation can i redit my website (no i dont think so, no cyber have .NET IDE ofcourse)
DLLs is away slower than any Javascript functions ofcourse !! it applies too to the AJAX.

By: ermenisoykirmi

ermenisoykirmi — Fri, 30 May 2008 21:16:17 +0000

Thanks.Good article

By: Model School

Model School — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:22:05 +0000

That and ASP.Net runs better on the server and play nice with your database request bandwidth. Refusal to move to ASP.Net is a career death wish if you want to stay with the Microsoft platform.
ILiyas Iliyas PatelSeo Expert IndiaSEO Master India

By: Model School

Model School — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:15:08 +0000

Hello Great posting on Ajax
zeeshan
http://zeeshan.modelschool.co.in

By: dan fad

dan fad — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:51:55 +0000

iâ€™m a classic ASP developer and i love it. with just a Notepad it’s very handy and you can update it any pc.

By: Nadira Sheikh

Nadira Sheikh — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:00:12 +0000

Its great i always used it..

By: atul sing

atul sing — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:59:13 +0000

Great info

By: Gajendra rathore

Gajendra rathore — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:58:15 +0000

Goode coding techniques

By: Kavita suryawanshi

Kavita suryawanshi — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:57:27 +0000

Weâ€™re cutting our own throats here by signing up for each new product that MS develops! I suppose younger readers will learn this soon enough when in a few years all their .NET experience counts for nothing and they find their jobs vanishing

By: Sebastian Gomez

Sebastian Gomez — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:03:29 +0000

i’m a classic ASP developer for some years now and i’ve tried the .NET platform and what you guys say it’s true: too much complicated. but the BIG reason to stay in ASP, the REAL one is the fact that you can integrate new code and edit existing one EASILY. i mean, in my job there’s a lot of maintaining job to the aplicattions, so, it’s pretty cool to open the .asp file, fix the bug, and voilÃ¡!… in this type of environment (a lot of changes pretty often) it would be nasty to re-compile the entire app in order to work… Â¿or am i missing some ASP.NET feature that avoid this?… anyway… my vote it’s for classic ASP

By: Pete

Pete — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:42:29 +0000

I’m a classic ASP programmer and I really enjoy using it. I’ve tried using .NET and ran thru some tutorials, etc. Bottom line for me was that .NET was way too complicated and bloated. Yet another steep learning curve!

[rant]
Frankly, I’m a bit tired of spending years gaining experience on a platform only to have it ripped out from under me and being forced to use yet another new product that costs big bucks and is supposedly so much better. I’ve been developing code for about 30 years now (Basic, Fortran, Pascal, Ada, C, C++, DOS, Windows, Visual C, Visual Basic, Visual Studio, MFC, Win32, COM, ASP, etc.) and with each “new and better” product that’s released, I end up having no more experience than the average 20 year old. We’re cutting our own throats here by signing up for each new product that MS develops! I suppose younger readers will learn this soon enough when in a few years all their .NET experience counts for nothing and they find their jobs vanishing.

I see these new platforms as just another way for MS to hold developers and companies hostage. I enjoy programming…not clicking checkboxes and dragging objects around. To me that’s not programming. At any rate, I don’t see ASP going away anytime soon since there’s about 100 million websites using the stuff and MS would be nuts to stop supporting it. Of course…this is MS w’re talking about here…..
[/rant]

Ok…I feel better now :-)