<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajaxian Roundup for January, 2008: JavaScript Turtles and IE 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattC</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8/comment-page-1#comment-261122</link>
		<dc:creator>MattC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8#comment-261122</guid>
		<description>Apologies, in my above post I typed began typing &quot;GWT&quot; about halfway through, in place of Gears. I meant Gears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies, in my above post I typed began typing &#8220;GWT&#8221; about halfway through, in place of Gears. I meant Gears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bond-Caron</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8/comment-page-1#comment-261094</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bond-Caron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8#comment-261094</guid>
		<description>Well said MattC, there seems to have been a shift in the neutrality of this blog. There&#039;s some extra GWT promotion going on but that&#039;s life (there&#039;s always some bias somewhere). Still enjoy very much reading the news here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said MattC, there seems to have been a shift in the neutrality of this blog. There&#8217;s some extra GWT promotion going on but that&#8217;s life (there&#8217;s always some bias somewhere). Still enjoy very much reading the news here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattC</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8/comment-page-1#comment-261089</link>
		<dc:creator>MattC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/ajaxian-roundup-for-january-2008-javascript-turtles-and-ie-8#comment-261089</guid>
		<description>Dion,

As always, thanks for this month-at-a-glance! It&#039;s a nice refresh of what&#039;s just gone by and I wish more news-oriented sites and blogs did this.

With that said, many casual readers here may not follow your employment too closely. The statement &quot;I think that we are getting the word out about Gears not being just about Offline, but a tool to upgrade the Web on the fly&quot; gave me a little pause, wondering if &quot;we&quot; in this context was Ajaxian, or Google. Since you are the sole author credited for this post, I&#039;m sure you can appreciate that it is tricky for someone (like myself!) to distinguish between Ajaxian&#039;s interest in GWT, and your interest in GWT (as a member of Google&#039;s Developer Programs group).

I&#039;m not sure of your exact position, so please correct me if I&#039;m mistaken, but, at least from a distance, it seems to be somewhat marketing or advocacy related. Is that fair?

I think this has become a really important and useful forum. I&#039;m a huge fan guys! And Dion, I think your disclosure has, generally, been excellent and appropriate -- with your regular readers well-apprised.  But with all of the above said, should we expect your two roles to remain separate? Or should we expect some overlap?

I imagine, personally, I would fine the former difficult, but would appreciate your comments.


Thank you,


-- Matt


ps - In my own full disclosure, I&#039;m am not, nor is my employer, a competitor to GWT. I&#039;m certainly making this comment on my own accord. Professionally, as a consultant, I am a user/consumer of tools like GWT and a reader of Ajaxian.com. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dion,</p>
<p>As always, thanks for this month-at-a-glance! It&#8217;s a nice refresh of what&#8217;s just gone by and I wish more news-oriented sites and blogs did this.</p>
<p>With that said, many casual readers here may not follow your employment too closely. The statement &#8220;I think that we are getting the word out about Gears not being just about Offline, but a tool to upgrade the Web on the fly&#8221; gave me a little pause, wondering if &#8220;we&#8221; in this context was Ajaxian, or Google. Since you are the sole author credited for this post, I&#8217;m sure you can appreciate that it is tricky for someone (like myself!) to distinguish between Ajaxian&#8217;s interest in GWT, and your interest in GWT (as a member of Google&#8217;s Developer Programs group).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure of your exact position, so please correct me if I&#8217;m mistaken, but, at least from a distance, it seems to be somewhat marketing or advocacy related. Is that fair?</p>
<p>I think this has become a really important and useful forum. I&#8217;m a huge fan guys! And Dion, I think your disclosure has, generally, been excellent and appropriate &#8212; with your regular readers well-apprised.  But with all of the above said, should we expect your two roles to remain separate? Or should we expect some overlap?</p>
<p>I imagine, personally, I would fine the former difficult, but would appreciate your comments.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>&#8211; Matt</p>
<p>ps &#8211; In my own full disclosure, I&#8217;m am not, nor is my employer, a competitor to GWT. I&#8217;m certainly making this comment on my own accord. Professionally, as a consultant, I am a user/consumer of tools like GWT and a reader of Ajaxian.com. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

