<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternate Ajax Techniques, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: quocbao</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>quocbao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t this this technique is new :( .
I&#039;ve seen this technique for long time ago (they use script or hidden frame) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t this this technique is new :( .<br />
I&#8217;ve seen this technique for long time ago (they use script or hidden frame) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bunting</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-3399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1#comment-3399</guid>
		<description>*yawn*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yawn*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-3391</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1#comment-3391</guid>
		<description>It should actually speed up the user experience, since the initial page will load faster without the full javascript library loaded automatically. It does mean that if you have the &#039;on-demand&#039; scripts tested for and loaded with onclick that the first such click will be a bit slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should actually speed up the user experience, since the initial page will load faster without the full javascript library loaded automatically. It does mean that if you have the &#8216;on-demand&#8217; scripts tested for and loaded with onclick that the first such click will be a bit slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinus</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-3384</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1#comment-3384</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t it slow down the user experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t it slow down the user experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-David Dalton</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>John-David Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/alternate-ajax-techniques-part-1#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if &quot;more complex&quot; is the correct way to put it. The script loading seems simpler to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if &#8220;more complex&#8221; is the correct way to put it. The script loading seems simpler to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

