<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automated security scanners choke on Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/automated-security-scanners-choke-on-ajax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/automated-security-scanners-choke-on-ajax</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: resim</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/automated-security-scanners-choke-on-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-257582</link>
		<dc:creator>resim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2866#comment-257582</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdmadph</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/automated-security-scanners-choke-on-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-256759</link>
		<dc:creator>mdmadph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2866#comment-256759</guid>
		<description>What?  IBM being more up-to-date and quicker-to-react that its competitors?  Are they turning a new leaf?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?  IBM being more up-to-date and quicker-to-react that its competitors?  Are they turning a new leaf?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navot</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/automated-security-scanners-choke-on-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-256752</link>
		<dc:creator>navot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2866#comment-256752</guid>
		<description>Security is not necessarily an inherent AJAX problem. For specified environments the problem simply does not exist. see this framework paradigm. One should be aware that I am not, and do not pretend to be objective, nevertheless I believe that one can judge for himself. Visual WebGui is an AJAX framework that doesnâ€™t expose logic, data or open services on client requests and therefore is not as vulnerable as common AJAX solution. Worth a look at www.visualwebgui.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security is not necessarily an inherent AJAX problem. For specified environments the problem simply does not exist. see this framework paradigm. One should be aware that I am not, and do not pretend to be objective, nevertheless I believe that one can judge for himself. Visual WebGui is an AJAX framework that doesnâ€™t expose logic, data or open services on client requests and therefore is not as vulnerable as common AJAX solution. Worth a look at <a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.visualwebgui.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

