<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Cache Usage: Only 40-60%?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Lowell</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245887</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Lowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245887</guid>
		<description>I would agree with Frederick.  Cache use and policy is very misunderstood.  There is an interesting site just promoting this Web developers http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/ and it is clear that the world doesn&#039;t buy into it if the servers from one product vendor of corporate USA are correct (http://www.port80software.com/surveys/top1000cachecontrol/).  Here it seems if people are even aware of caching they are all about busting them not embracing them in any capacity.  Let&#039;s keep hoping this becomes novice info but right now it clearly isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with Frederick.  Cache use and policy is very misunderstood.  There is an interesting site just promoting this Web developers <a href="http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/</a> and it is clear that the world doesn&#8217;t buy into it if the servers from one product vendor of corporate USA are correct (<a href="http://www.port80software.com/surveys/top1000cachecontrol/" rel="nofollow">http://www.port80software.com/surveys/top1000cachecontrol/</a>).  Here it seems if people are even aware of caching they are all about busting them not embracing them in any capacity.  Let&#8217;s keep hoping this becomes novice info but right now it clearly isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick Townes</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245858</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick Townes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245858</guid>
		<description>On the contrary Vijaya, I think there are quite a few misconceptions surrounding caching and even more permutations of browsing environments to consider about the same. So having a look at the experiences of a highly trafficked site is extremely useful and points too many of the other posts here speaking to maximizing caching and http compression etc. We&#039;ve always focused on leveraging the use of the cache during only during the session and if you also build your sites with a similar perspective I can see how you&#039;d find this post to be of no consequence. It should in fact prove that optimizing sites to use caching during the session along with other code and markup optimizations have a will continue to be among the better approaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary Vijaya, I think there are quite a few misconceptions surrounding caching and even more permutations of browsing environments to consider about the same. So having a look at the experiences of a highly trafficked site is extremely useful and points too many of the other posts here speaking to maximizing caching and http compression etc. We&#8217;ve always focused on leveraging the use of the cache during only during the session and if you also build your sites with a similar perspective I can see how you&#8217;d find this post to be of no consequence. It should in fact prove that optimizing sites to use caching during the session along with other code and markup optimizations have a will continue to be among the better approaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijaya Bhaskar</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245848</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijaya Bhaskar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 02:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245848</guid>
		<description>These are browser basic concepts.If you are web deveoper you should know there concepts before writing your first hello world program in web.I don&#039;t think this is value added article.But good for beginners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are browser basic concepts.If you are web deveoper you should know there concepts before writing your first hello world program in web.I don&#8217;t think this is value added article.But good for beginners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jia</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245826</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245826</guid>
		<description>Great point, but not surprising though. 
IE7 now offering cache cleaning on browser close, and Firefox does that by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, but not surprising though.<br />
IE7 now offering cache cleaning on browser close, and Firefox does that by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeskumar</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245812</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeskumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245812</guid>
		<description>Great post. Thanks. 
Does this 20% empty cache include  &quot;If_Modified_Since&quot; requests also ?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Thanks.<br />
Does this 20% empty cache include  &#8220;If_Modified_Since&#8221; requests also ?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245806</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245806</guid>
		<description>How much of these empty cachers are developers or designers that are using the firefox web developer toolbar.  I don&#039;t know about everyone else, but many times I am browsing while I am developing (while my cache is turned off) and then the other half of the time I just forget to turn the cache back on.  Granted, this doesn&#039;t account for 20% of a web visits, but it does make me curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of these empty cachers are developers or designers that are using the firefox web developer toolbar.  I don&#8217;t know about everyone else, but many times I am browsing while I am developing (while my cache is turned off) and then the other half of the time I just forget to turn the cache back on.  Granted, this doesn&#8217;t account for 20% of a web visits, but it does make me curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245804</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245804</guid>
		<description>Interesting. That sheds new light on the question of file size and JS libraries. A lot of times the answer to concerns about that is &quot;don&#039;t worry about file size- browser cache is your friend.&quot; It still is, just not as much of a friend as I would have expected. And if Yahoo! is seeing this sort of ratio, imagine what the numbers are for all the rest of the sites on the internet that don&#039;t have yahoo!&#039;s massive user base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. That sheds new light on the question of file size and JS libraries. A lot of times the answer to concerns about that is &#8220;don&#8217;t worry about file size- browser cache is your friend.&#8221; It still is, just not as much of a friend as I would have expected. And if Yahoo! is seeing this sort of ratio, imagine what the numbers are for all the rest of the sites on the internet that don&#8217;t have yahoo!&#8217;s massive user base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougal Matthews</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60/comment-page-1#comment-245802</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougal Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-cache-usage-only-40-60#comment-245802</guid>
		<description>Just what i wanted to know more about!

I have been working on a project and this was one of the concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what i wanted to know more about!</p>
<p>I have been working on a project and this was one of the concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

