<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Detection with XSLT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSt</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-271035</link>
		<dc:creator>MSt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-271035</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve updated the demo to run with IE 7 too and at the same time moved   to XHTML 1.1. Do you see any other problems?  
@davidlantner
Can you give more details? As far as I can see, the page is served as &quot;application/xml&quot; because IE does _not_ allow “application/xhtml+xml”
@zachleat
_my_ website has about 24.000 pages, don&#039;t know if it qualifies as &quot;major&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve updated the demo to run with IE 7 too and at the same time moved   to XHTML 1.1. Do you see any other problems?<br />
@davidlantner<br />
Can you give more details? As far as I can see, the page is served as &#8220;application/xml&#8221; because IE does _not_ allow “application/xhtml+xml”<br />
@zachleat<br />
_my_ website has about 24.000 pages, don&#8217;t know if it qualifies as &#8220;major&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNO</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270832</link>
		<dc:creator>TNO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270832</guid>
		<description>@davidlantner
Probably because IE and older Opera puke on that mimetype</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@davidlantner<br />
Probably because IE and older Opera puke on that mimetype</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidlantner</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270825</link>
		<dc:creator>davidlantner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270825</guid>
		<description>By the way, note that Manfred is serving the page as &quot;text/xml&quot;, which is &lt;strong&gt;deprecated&lt;/strong&gt;, whereas the Diablo3 site is served as &quot;application/xhtml+xml&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, note that Manfred is serving the page as &#8220;text/xml&#8221;, which is <strong>deprecated</strong>, whereas the Diablo3 site is served as &#8220;application/xhtml+xml&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oopstudios</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270806</link>
		<dc:creator>oopstudios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270806</guid>
		<description>Brilliant! Now to do it in javascript instead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant! Now to do it in javascript instead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNO</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270790</link>
		<dc:creator>TNO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270790</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t you mean @zachleat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t you mean @zachleat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr01d</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270789</link>
		<dc:creator>dr01d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270789</guid>
		<description>@TNO:

Diablo 3 site is using XML + XSLT and it is pretty slick.

Another thing thats pretty interesting is that you can do the transformation serverside with Apache if you compile modxslt2 found here: http://www.mod-xslt2.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TNO:</p>
<p>Diablo 3 site is using XML + XSLT and it is pretty slick.</p>
<p>Another thing thats pretty interesting is that you can do the transformation serverside with Apache if you compile modxslt2 found here: <a href="http://www.mod-xslt2.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mod-xslt2.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNO</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270788</link>
		<dc:creator>TNO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270788</guid>
		<description>@jaysmith:
In IE6+ you can rely on XPath/XSL 1.0 support, but not much more than that. you have to get creative if things get complex. (But hey, at least its Turing Complete). Plus I&#039;m pretty sure IE6 supports import and include. Now, whether its bugged or not is another question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jaysmith:<br />
In IE6+ you can rely on XPath/XSL 1.0 support, but not much more than that. you have to get creative if things get complex. (But hey, at least its Turing Complete). Plus I&#8217;m pretty sure IE6 supports import and include. Now, whether its bugged or not is another question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaysmith</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270785</link>
		<dc:creator>jaysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270785</guid>
		<description>WOW (and i dont mean world of warcraft). The xslt trick above demonstrates a hidden temple. I&#039;ve written alot of xslt but never in the client because of cloudy browser support.

I did&#039;nt know ie6 could run this. Amazing. So the only thing not really working in clientside xslt would be the importance of &quot;import&quot; and &quot;include&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW (and i dont mean world of warcraft). The xslt trick above demonstrates a hidden temple. I&#8217;ve written alot of xslt but never in the client because of cloudy browser support.</p>
<p>I did&#8217;nt know ie6 could run this. Amazing. So the only thing not really working in clientside xslt would be the importance of &#8220;import&#8221; and &#8220;include&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zachleat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270779</link>
		<dc:creator>zachleat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270779</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know of any major websites using XSLT clientside besides the World or Warcraft one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know of any major websites using XSLT clientside besides the World or Warcraft one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNO</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270777</link>
		<dc:creator>TNO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270777</guid>
		<description>@jaysmith:
As you probably already know, XSL + XML can be used as a client side markup preprocessor (I can create a webpage with a single tag called &lt;calendar/&gt; and transform it into a full blown table of all the months or whatever at runtime across my pages). Part of the standard XSL library includes a function to determine what type of engine is transforming the syntax. Using this you can determine before render time what browser is viewing the page and adjust accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jaysmith:<br />
As you probably already know, XSL + XML can be used as a client side markup preprocessor (I can create a webpage with a single tag called &lt;calendar/&gt; and transform it into a full blown table of all the months or whatever at runtime across my pages). Part of the standard XSL library includes a function to determine what type of engine is transforming the syntax. Using this you can determine before render time what browser is viewing the page and adjust accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaysmith</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270775</link>
		<dc:creator>jaysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270775</guid>
		<description>Could someone explain what this really is? How and what could we use this for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone explain what this really is? How and what could we use this for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNO</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270769</link>
		<dc:creator>TNO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270769</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used this property quite a few times over the years but its only practical if people use XML + XSL to generate their web pages, and in my experience less than a handful bother. Whether its a lack of understanding or a lack of opportunity I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used this property quite a few times over the years but its only practical if people use XML + XSL to generate their web pages, and in my experience less than a handful bother. Whether its a lack of understanding or a lack of opportunity I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OndraM</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/browser-detection-with-xslt/comment-page-1#comment-270768</link>
		<dc:creator>OndraM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5797#comment-270768</guid>
		<description>Works great in FF and IE6, but I get an Invalid Request error in IE7 (7.0.5730.13)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works great in FF and IE6, but I get an Invalid Request error in IE7 (7.0.5730.13)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

