<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDNs Gaining Broader Use with JavaScript Libraries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNO</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269358</link>
		<dc:creator>TNO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269358</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I also think that if you’re going to say something “sucks”, you should explain why. It would help newcomers determine what product would be the ideal match for them based on other people’s opinions.&lt;/b&gt;
.
@pharmx:
Just look at my previous comments in reply to Thomas on earlier posts for more depth to the arguments:
http://ajaxian.com/archives/jx-layout-manager-for-jquery#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I also think that if you’re going to say something “sucks”, you should explain why. It would help newcomers determine what product would be the ideal match for them based on other people’s opinions.</b><br />
.<br />
@pharmx:<br />
Just look at my previous comments in reply to Thomas on earlier posts for more depth to the arguments:<br />
<a href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/jx-layout-manager-for-jquery#comments" rel="nofollow">http://ajaxian.com/archives/jx-layout-manager-for-jquery#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovejs</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269351</link>
		<dc:creator>lovejs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269351</guid>
		<description>pharmx: I mentioned why... Things that don&#039;t catch on after a more then decent amount of shameless &quot;marketing&quot; plugs generally suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pharmx: I mentioned why&#8230; Things that don&#8217;t catch on after a more then decent amount of shameless &#8220;marketing&#8221; plugs generally suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pharmx</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269350</link>
		<dc:creator>pharmx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269350</guid>
		<description>@lovejs: While I agree that self promoting on websites and forums as a form of marketing is not a good thing, it unfortunately seems to be prevalent in every field...video games, music, etc.  Guerilla marketing is everywhere.  However, I also think that if you&#039;re going to say something &quot;sucks&quot;, you should explain why.  It would help newcomers determine what product would be the ideal match for them based on other people&#039;s opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lovejs: While I agree that self promoting on websites and forums as a form of marketing is not a good thing, it unfortunately seems to be prevalent in every field&#8230;video games, music, etc.  Guerilla marketing is everywhere.  However, I also think that if you&#8217;re going to say something &#8220;sucks&#8221;, you should explain why.  It would help newcomers determine what product would be the ideal match for them based on other people&#8217;s opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovejs</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269347</link>
		<dc:creator>lovejs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269347</guid>
		<description>ThomasHansen: Those shameless plugs of your home cooked rajax library are getting old. It&#039;s pretty obvious you plug it every time you get the chance. It would&#039;ve catched on already if it didn&#039;t suck, ajaxian doesn&#039;t need spam on the menu, try something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ThomasHansen: Those shameless plugs of your home cooked rajax library are getting old. It&#8217;s pretty obvious you plug it every time you get the chance. It would&#8217;ve catched on already if it didn&#8217;t suck, ajaxian doesn&#8217;t need spam on the menu, try something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterCr</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269327</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterCr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269327</guid>
		<description>Joeri - Ext is GPL not LGPL - HUGE difference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joeri &#8211; Ext is GPL not LGPL &#8211; HUGE difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rey Bango</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269320</link>
		<dc:creator>Rey Bango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269320</guid>
		<description>@excalo Thank you for catching that. Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@excalo Thank you for catching that. Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeri</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269319</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269319</guid>
		<description>@viper2k: Please, personal attacks have nothing to do with the matter. (Btw, I wish I was an extjs insider, because I think it&#039;s a really cool project.)
.
I don&#039;t get why some people get so mad at the Ext guys for trying to earn a living from what they do. Ext is not comparable as a project to jquery, mootools or dojo because the way the development of those projects gets funded (and make no mistake, they all get funded somehow) does not seem to be feasible for Ext. I wish Ext was BSD as well, but I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s possible, and consider the LGPL dual license the best possible compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@viper2k: Please, personal attacks have nothing to do with the matter. (Btw, I wish I was an extjs insider, because I think it&#8217;s a really cool project.)<br />
.<br />
I don&#8217;t get why some people get so mad at the Ext guys for trying to earn a living from what they do. Ext is not comparable as a project to jquery, mootools or dojo because the way the development of those projects gets funded (and make no mistake, they all get funded somehow) does not seem to be feasible for Ext. I wish Ext was BSD as well, but I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s possible, and consider the LGPL dual license the best possible compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viper2k</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269317</link>
		<dc:creator>viper2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269317</guid>
		<description>Joeri - you seem to have a lot of &quot;inside&quot; Ext perspective, if you get my drift.

First you say :

&quot;First they complained that the library wasn’t free enough, so the ext guys gave it the most radical of the Free licenses, the GPL, and now they complain yet again that it’s not free enough.&quot;

Radical of the free licenses, huh? Have you heard of BSD or MIT? GPL is the most viral licenses. 

You then go on to say &quot;
&quot;Ext doesn’t have the corporate sponsorship of YUI or the huge developer community of dojo to survive&quot;

Is this your sorry excuse to defend Ext? There are other libraries like Moo and JQuery with the most radical of free licenses without any weak excuse from an insider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joeri &#8211; you seem to have a lot of &#8220;inside&#8221; Ext perspective, if you get my drift.</p>
<p>First you say :</p>
<p>&#8220;First they complained that the library wasn’t free enough, so the ext guys gave it the most radical of the Free licenses, the GPL, and now they complain yet again that it’s not free enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>Radical of the free licenses, huh? Have you heard of BSD or MIT? GPL is the most viral licenses. </p>
<p>You then go on to say &#8221;<br />
&#8220;Ext doesn’t have the corporate sponsorship of YUI or the huge developer community of dojo to survive&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this your sorry excuse to defend Ext? There are other libraries like Moo and JQuery with the most radical of free licenses without any weak excuse from an insider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeri</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269311</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269311</guid>
		<description>@daanlib: If Ext was licensed under the LGPL, it would be straightforward to build closed projects on top of it without buying the library. Nobody would pay for it. Ext doesn&#039;t have the corporate sponsorship of YUI or the huge developer community of dojo to survive something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@daanlib: If Ext was licensed under the LGPL, it would be straightforward to build closed projects on top of it without buying the library. Nobody would pay for it. Ext doesn&#8217;t have the corporate sponsorship of YUI or the huge developer community of dojo to survive something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excalo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269310</link>
		<dc:creator>excalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269310</guid>
		<description>Typo in the first paragraph: &lt;i&gt;&quot;...helping frameworks service &lt;b&gt;there&lt;/b&gt; users in a sustainable manner.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Should be &lt;i&gt;&quot;their&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo in the first paragraph: <i>&#8220;&#8230;helping frameworks service <b>there</b> users in a sustainable manner.&#8221;</i> Should be <i>&#8220;their&#8221;</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daanlib</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269309</link>
		<dc:creator>daanlib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269309</guid>
		<description>@Joeri: I guess the problem is the choice for the GPL license, instead of the LGPL. This makes it impossible to use Ext in projects that aren&#039;t completely GPL licensed, as viper2k explaines above. For many people this is an obstacle.
Personally I think Ext is great, and I am prepared to buy a commercial license, but using the GPL for a library prevents people from using it, because they have to publish their complete source, instead of only the changes/additions they make to the library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joeri: I guess the problem is the choice for the GPL license, instead of the LGPL. This makes it impossible to use Ext in projects that aren&#8217;t completely GPL licensed, as viper2k explaines above. For many people this is an obstacle.<br />
Personally I think Ext is great, and I am prepared to buy a commercial license, but using the GPL for a library prevents people from using it, because they have to publish their complete source, instead of only the changes/additions they make to the library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasHansen</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269308</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasHansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269308</guid>
		<description>@Joeri
Good point ;)
@TheWorld
There&#039;s another option to CDNs you know, which is to use an insane small amount of JavaScript - like Ra-Ajax ( http://ra-ajax.org ) does - less then 20KB i total. And it&#039;ll mostly never grow to more than 10-15KB in your own apps...
.
In fact at our samples section our Google Analytics inclusion script is *more then half* the entire JavaScript on the pages... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joeri<br />
Good point ;)<br />
@TheWorld<br />
There&#8217;s another option to CDNs you know, which is to use an insane small amount of JavaScript &#8211; like Ra-Ajax ( <a href="http://ra-ajax.org" rel="nofollow">http://ra-ajax.org</a> ) does &#8211; less then 20KB i total. And it&#8217;ll mostly never grow to more than 10-15KB in your own apps&#8230;<br />
.<br />
In fact at our samples section our Google Analytics inclusion script is *more then half* the entire JavaScript on the pages&#8230; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeri</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269305</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269305</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get the Ext hate. First they complained that the library wasn&#039;t free enough, so the ext guys gave it the most radical of the Free licenses, the GPL, and now they complain yet again that it&#039;s not free enough. Seems to me the complainers just don&#039;t want any license in which the developers get paid for their work.
.
The whole situation sharply reminds me of the qt license debates. It is an exact replay of that story, and I&#039;m on the side of the qt and ext guys on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get the Ext hate. First they complained that the library wasn&#8217;t free enough, so the ext guys gave it the most radical of the Free licenses, the GPL, and now they complain yet again that it&#8217;s not free enough. Seems to me the complainers just don&#8217;t want any license in which the developers get paid for their work.<br />
.<br />
The whole situation sharply reminds me of the qt license debates. It is an exact replay of that story, and I&#8217;m on the side of the qt and ext guys on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viper2k</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269302</link>
		<dc:creator>viper2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269302</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what Jack aka self proclaimed legal expert says about this:    
http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?p=156236#post156236 

&quot;This is correct for any code that is, for example, just sending down JSON or XML. If you are generating any markup or javascript code via the server in a page SPECIFICALLY designed for Ext, then that server code will have to be GPL as well.

For example:

- Suppose you have an index.php that includes Ext JS. According to the FSF, in that case index.php would be also under GPL since it is using ext. Since it must be GPL, it&#039;s source must be distributed. Since it is GPL, the &quot;viral&quot; effect of GPL is now in effect and any thing that uses index.php (if anything) on the serverside would also fall under the GPL. (Note: Note this is a pretty gray area)

- Suppose you are using server-side code to generate javascript that interacts with Ext JS. That code must also be GPL.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what Jack aka self proclaimed legal expert says about this:<br />
<a href="http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?p=156236#post156236" rel="nofollow">http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?p=156236#post156236</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;This is correct for any code that is, for example, just sending down JSON or XML. If you are generating any markup or javascript code via the server in a page SPECIFICALLY designed for Ext, then that server code will have to be GPL as well.</p>
<p>For example:</p>
<p>- Suppose you have an index.php that includes Ext JS. According to the FSF, in that case index.php would be also under GPL since it is using ext. Since it must be GPL, it&#8217;s source must be distributed. Since it is GPL, the &#8220;viral&#8221; effect of GPL is now in effect and any thing that uses index.php (if anything) on the serverside would also fall under the GPL. (Note: Note this is a pretty gray area)</p>
<p>- Suppose you are using server-side code to generate javascript that interacts with Ext JS. That code must also be GPL.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daanlib</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269299</link>
		<dc:creator>daanlib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269299</guid>
		<description>@PeterCr: I know this is not the right place to ask, but do you have a link to some information about the consequences of Ext being GPL licensed? I tried finding out wether this means the server side part of a project that uses Ext-JS (not Ext GWT) should be GPL&#039;led too if the software itself is not distributed, but is used by many people, but I can&#039;t find an answer to this question, neither on te Ext site nor on the GPL license sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@PeterCr: I know this is not the right place to ask, but do you have a link to some information about the consequences of Ext being GPL licensed? I tried finding out wether this means the server side part of a project that uses Ext-JS (not Ext GWT) should be GPL&#8217;led too if the software itself is not distributed, but is used by many people, but I can&#8217;t find an answer to this question, neither on te Ext site nor on the GPL license sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterCr</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269298</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterCr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269298</guid>
		<description>Looks like Google truned down hosting Ext due to licensing issues with Ext.

http://extisevil.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-gives-ext-finger.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Google truned down hosting Ext due to licensing issues with Ext.</p>
<p><a href="http://extisevil.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-gives-ext-finger.html" rel="nofollow">http://extisevil.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-gives-ext-finger.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alp</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/cdns-gaining-broader-use-with-javascript-libraries/comment-page-1#comment-269297</link>
		<dc:creator>alp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5170#comment-269297</guid>
		<description>Rey, perhaps it&#039;s worth noting for the new reader that Dojo has been using CDNs for a couple of years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rey, perhaps it&#8217;s worth noting for the new reader that Dojo has been using CDNs for a couple of years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

