Comments on: Chrome Extension Process Model Design Doc

By: hismightiness

hismightiness — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:49:02 +0000

Gotta love when people only present problems (complain), instead of presenting solutions.

FYI (to all) – If you find a problem with something (anything), your comments are much better received if you present them with a suggestion or solution.

By: slightlyoff

slightlyoff — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:40:05 +0000

sroussey:

as you may know, Chrome already supports multiple profiles. Extensions, of course, are totally optional. If you have a concrete suggestion about how you think extensions should interact with sensitive sites (https:// sites, for example), now would be the time to get those concerns aired in the Chrome Extension process.

Regards

By: sroussey

sroussey — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:09:54 +0000

@epascarello: for firefox I keep a separate profile for banking, etc., but i do have to worry about other people that don’t…

By: WillPeavy

WillPeavy — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:08:16 +0000

Awesome. The API looks great.

By: epascarello

epascarello — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:39:58 +0000

@sroussey Than do not install them!
.
Looks nicer to code than FF extensions

By: sroussey

sroussey — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:27:11 +0000

Can’t we have a browser that doesn’t have extensions, browser helper objects, or other 3rd party code that can watch me log into my bank every day?