<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clipmarks: Ajax Image Clipping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Ramble &#187; Review: Google Notebook and Clipmark</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Ramble &#187; Review: Google Notebook and Clipmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-10196</guid>
		<description>[...] I went on to check out Clipmarks, and I want to like it. It&#8217;s also a plugin and you have to sign up for a free account (the Google Notebook also requires a google account, which anyone with a gmail account (for example) already has). This utility has been around a while longer. I googled up reviews here, here, and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I went on to check out Clipmarks, and I want to like it. It&#8217;s also a plugin and you have to sign up for a free account (the Google Notebook also requires a google account, which anyone with a gmail account (for example) already has). This utility has been around a while longer. I googled up reviews here, here, and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajaxian &#187; Audible Ajax 16: March State of Ajax</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-4642</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajaxian &#187; Audible Ajax 16: March State of Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-4642</guid>
		<description>[...] Clipmarks: Ajax Image Clipping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clipmarks: Ajax Image Clipping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Schiller</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-4580</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-4580</guid>
		<description>Eric,

Provided you could work with cross-frame security etc. (given your content is all coming from the same domain), I think you could improve the performance of your site. It&#039;s easier to work with content all on one page of course, which I understand completely - there&#039;s a fine balance between development convenience, performance and features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Provided you could work with cross-frame security etc. (given your content is all coming from the same domain), I think you could improve the performance of your site. It&#8217;s easier to work with content all on one page of course, which I understand completely &#8211; there&#8217;s a fine balance between development convenience, performance and features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Weitner/Clipmarks</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-4473</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Weitner/Clipmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-4473</guid>
		<description>First off, thank you Dion and Ajaxian for the great review.  I am a huge fan of Ajaxian and this mention is an honor for us and the hard work that went into developing Clipmarks.

I&#039;d also like to respond to Scott ... I totally respect your opinion regarding a browser being more efficient than javascript for dynamic layouts.  Most of the time, I agree.  In our case, there is some stuff that the navigator is doing that would not be possible using a frameset or straight HTML.  If we did break it into a frameset, we would still need javascript for the two-way communication the layout has with the server.  

We appreciate everyone&#039;s feedback, and please don&#039;t hesitate to let us know any ways you think we could improve clipmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, thank you Dion and Ajaxian for the great review.  I am a huge fan of Ajaxian and this mention is an honor for us and the hard work that went into developing Clipmarks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to respond to Scott &#8230; I totally respect your opinion regarding a browser being more efficient than javascript for dynamic layouts.  Most of the time, I agree.  In our case, there is some stuff that the navigator is doing that would not be possible using a frameset or straight HTML.  If we did break it into a frameset, we would still need javascript for the two-way communication the layout has with the server.  </p>
<p>We appreciate everyone&#8217;s feedback, and please don&#8217;t hesitate to let us know any ways you think we could improve clipmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Schiller</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;d be better off for efficiency reasons if they used a frameset, in all seriousness. There appears to be a lot of javascript running expensive calculations on that page to handle window resize events etc., and performance suffers as a result. Call me old-fashioned, but I&#039;m not a fan of using javascript for layout control to that degree. Browsers were made to scroll and they do it well - let them do so! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;d be better off for efficiency reasons if they used a frameset, in all seriousness. There appears to be a lot of javascript running expensive calculations on that page to handle window resize events etc., and performance suffers as a result. Call me old-fashioned, but I&#8217;m not a fan of using javascript for layout control to that degree. Browsers were made to scroll and they do it well &#8211; let them do so! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pflasko</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>Pflasko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>Clipmarks is not just a prime piece of ajax, but a useful tool to save code examples and other geeky references.  The public community leaves a bit to be desired in terms of sheer volume, but what is represented is so eclectic, you&#039;re sure to find something that floats your boat.  It&#039;s not purely for the tech savvy like digg is.  Also - Warning: to clip you must install a toolbar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clipmarks is not just a prime piece of ajax, but a useful tool to save code examples and other geeky references.  The public community leaves a bit to be desired in terms of sheer volume, but what is represented is so eclectic, you&#8217;re sure to find something that floats your boat.  It&#8217;s not purely for the tech savvy like digg is.  Also &#8211; Warning: to clip you must install a toolbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La brujula verde &#187; Clipmarks, un Digg cargado de Ajax</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>La brujula verde &#187; Clipmarks, un Digg cargado de Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>[...] [VÃ­a Ajaxian] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [VÃ­a Ajaxian] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nels</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping/comment-page-1#comment-4420</link>
		<dc:creator>Nels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/clipmarks-ajax-image-clipping#comment-4420</guid>
		<description>Clipmarks is supercool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clipmarks is supercool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

