<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compression, Caching, for faster load times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick Townes</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times/comment-page-1#comment-245505</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick Townes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times#comment-245505</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious if anyone provided/found any documentation they could share on the relationship between compression rate and load time as well as the point of no return that Jesse was talking about.  I wonder if port80software has anything to say about these subtle, yet relevant issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious if anyone provided/found any documentation they could share on the relationship between compression rate and load time as well as the point of no return that Jesse was talking about.  I wonder if port80software has anything to say about these subtle, yet relevant issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeri</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times/comment-page-1#comment-230261</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times#comment-230261</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to see a benchmark of loading time versus compression rate. Gzip has different compression settings, and compression time varies a lot depending on the setting. I&#039;ve used it successfully in the past when sending large datasets to the client (flash application loading multi-megabyte XML files which couldn&#039;t be shrunk down), but I just picked the compression level that offered the best trade-off between filesize and compression time, instead of the one that produced the quickest load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see a benchmark of loading time versus compression rate. Gzip has different compression settings, and compression time varies a lot depending on the setting. I&#8217;ve used it successfully in the past when sending large datasets to the client (flash application loading multi-megabyte XML files which couldn&#8217;t be shrunk down), but I just picked the compression level that offered the best trade-off between filesize and compression time, instead of the one that produced the quickest load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: negate.net &#187; apache mod_deflate reduces bandwidth usage by 27% on SuperMotors.net</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times/comment-page-1#comment-229703</link>
		<dc:creator>negate.net &#187; apache mod_deflate reduces bandwidth usage by 27% on SuperMotors.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 01:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times#comment-229703</guid>
		<description>[...] 12/4/06 Edit: Ajaxian has an article on gzip compression with some user responses. Interesting insights (in the comments section) on the law of diminishing returns with gzip compression used on ajax-enabled pages.Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 12/4/06 Edit: Ajaxian has an article on gzip compression with some user responses. Interesting insights (in the comments section) on the law of diminishing returns with gzip compression used on ajax-enabled pages.Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kuhnert</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times/comment-page-1#comment-229331</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kuhnert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times#comment-229331</guid>
		<description>If you are really itching to squeeze as much compression out of it as possible, there&#039;s an undocumented (simply because I&#039;m not sure if everyone might like it) feature of the dojo compressor where you run your build as you normally would be add &quot;gen-strip-docs&quot; to the list of tasks to execute. The savings vary depending on the size of the dojo.js file being compressed. (and the questionable reason why it&#039;s not documented is because of what it does to compress &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; of the dojo related js files found in your release directory.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are really itching to squeeze as much compression out of it as possible, there&#8217;s an undocumented (simply because I&#8217;m not sure if everyone might like it) feature of the dojo compressor where you run your build as you normally would be add &#8220;gen-strip-docs&#8221; to the list of tasks to execute. The savings vary depending on the size of the dojo.js file being compressed. (and the questionable reason why it&#8217;s not documented is because of what it does to compress <i>all</i> of the dojo related js files found in your release directory.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times/comment-page-1#comment-229283</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times#comment-229283</guid>
		<description>Be careful when packing to remove line breaks - if you are missing a semi-colon then your javascript might not be valid after removing the line breaks. Of course using JSlint should detect missing semi-colons. Perhaps packer should have an option to remove comments and whitespace but leave in the line breaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful when packing to remove line breaks &#8211; if you are missing a semi-colon then your javascript might not be valid after removing the line breaks. Of course using JSlint should detect missing semi-colons. Perhaps packer should have an option to remove comments and whitespace but leave in the line breaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kuhnert</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times/comment-page-1#comment-229090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kuhnert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/compression-caching-for-faster-load-times#comment-229090</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only done some limited &quot;eyeball&quot; testing using fiddler to time response times using/not using gzip compression. (didn&#039;t have the new firebug version at the time)

The performance differences were extremely slim for smaller dynamic responses, but still just a few ms faster than non compressed versions. 

It would be good to get a more definitive set of tests to be sure everything is working as efficiently as possible though. (the css/javascript/etc file based compressions I do get cached in-memory until the files change on disk so that particular aspect of things hasn&#039;t had any porblems wrt performance in cpu cycles )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only done some limited &#8220;eyeball&#8221; testing using fiddler to time response times using/not using gzip compression. (didn&#8217;t have the new firebug version at the time)</p>
<p>The performance differences were extremely slim for smaller dynamic responses, but still just a few ms faster than non compressed versions. </p>
<p>It would be good to get a more definitive set of tests to be sure everything is working as efficiently as possible though. (the css/javascript/etc file based compressions I do get cached in-memory until the files change on disk so that particular aspect of things hasn&#8217;t had any porblems wrt performance in cpu cycles )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

