Comments on: Cross Domain XHR W3C proposal

By: pass4sure

pass4sure — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:32:49 +0000

What Pass4sure does is to provide customers with every facility in IT certification exams. It owns many famous IT certifications, like Cisco, Microsoft, IBM, Sun, compTIA, HP, etc, with a variety of forms, such as software, hardcopy, video, E-Zine. In order to thank customers for their contribution to the website, Pass4sure promoted many discounts for its products regularly.The Most Popular exams List :646-671 220-602 132-S-900.7 310-065 642-873 642-383 642-456 N10-004 220-602 312-50 642-383 642-642 SK0-002 350-030 640-721 646-204 HP0-D04 646-230 642-357 642-164 646-563 SK0-002 640-802 Click Pass For Sure to get more information!

By: backdraft

backdraft — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:02:06 +0000

very nice implementation. hope this will come soon!

By: Tiago Albineli Motta

Tiago Albineli Motta — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:33:33 +0000

While it’s not possible we have to use script on-demand. Globo Videos started using this approach in the new version.

By: Barnaby Claydon

Barnaby Claydon — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:25:00 +0000

Interesting proposal. I hope it gets adopted although there’s certainly a need for something even more comprehensive.

Out of curiousity, where it states “…forces developers to use more secure explicit forms of authentication maintanence.” what exactly would those be? I’m in need of auth maintenance on a current project in this XHR context and am intrigued by what this statement implies.

By: Jason Levine

Jason Levine — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:11:48 +0000

Very nice. At the very least, it would remove an annoyance I have with my scripts. If I have a.domain.com and b.domain.com, JavaScript sees them as separate domains and refuses to allow XMLHTTP connections between the two. With this, I could set up each to get connections from the other and finally be able to communicate between all of my *.domain.com websites!

By: Mark Holton

Mark Holton — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:43:07 +0000

…interesting… the more news, feedback, thoughts on this, the better.

By: Joe Travaglini

Joe Travaglini — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:30:22 +0000

This is great news! It will remove the necessity of my numerous poor-man’s-proxy scripts to broker my AJAX requests…

But what will be the migration strategy for the various web and app servers to adopt it?