<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dean Edwards and Another Base.js</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: h3</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs/comment-page-1#comment-78662</link>
		<dc:creator>h3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs#comment-78662</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;dkappe&quot;&gt;P.S. Can we go back to calling it Livescript again? ;-)&lt;/blockquote&gt;
ahahah good idea, i&#039;m tired to have to explain that JavaScript have nothing to do with Java</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="dkappe"><p>P.S. Can we go back to calling it Livescript again? ;-)</p></blockquote>
<p>ahahah good idea, i&#8217;m tired to have to explain that JavaScript have nothing to do with Java</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dkappe</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs/comment-page-1#comment-5553</link>
		<dc:creator>dkappe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs#comment-5553</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is good stuff, but I also think it&#039;s funny that we feel a need to &quot;fix&quot; javascript so that it looks more like a class based, declarative language than a prototype based one.

Maybe the emergence of Ajax and the influx of developers used to strongly typed languages will drive some innovations and changes in Javascript. One can only hope.

P.S. Can we go back to calling it Livescript again? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is good stuff, but I also think it&#8217;s funny that we feel a need to &#8220;fix&#8221; javascript so that it looks more like a class based, declarative language than a prototype based one.</p>
<p>Maybe the emergence of Ajax and the influx of developers used to strongly typed languages will drive some innovations and changes in Javascript. One can only hope.</p>
<p>P.S. Can we go back to calling it Livescript again? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs/comment-page-1#comment-5309</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/dean-edwards-and-another-basejs#comment-5309</guid>
		<description>Good stuff, but I was confused at first with this.inherit(), I thought it was more of a declaration of inheritence (like .extend() is), not calling an overridden method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff, but I was confused at first with this.inherit(), I thought it was more of a declaration of inheritence (like .extend() is), not calling an overridden method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

