<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3: SQLite and more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ix</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251914</link>
		<dc:creator>ix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251914</guid>
		<description>yeah. configure script dies if you --disable-places anyways :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah. configure script dies if you &#8211;disable-places anyways :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeri</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251702</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251702</guid>
		<description>ix: this is supposed to speed up and trim the bookmarks system, not bloat it or slow it down. The sqlite libraries are very small and only included once. It&#039;s much more efficient to use sqlite than to use separate storage engines for every major feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ix: this is supposed to speed up and trim the bookmarks system, not bloat it or slow it down. The sqlite libraries are very small and only included once. It&#8217;s much more efficient to use sqlite than to use separate storage engines for every major feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mozbeast</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251690</link>
		<dc:creator>mozbeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251690</guid>
		<description>speaking of ff3, if anyone is sick of the bloat , check out webkit-gdk:

svn checkout http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk WebKit &amp;&amp; \
WebKit/WebKitTools/Scripts/build-webkit --gdk &amp;&amp; \
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=WebKit/WebKitBuild/Release/lib WebKit/WebKitBuild/Release/WebKitTools/GdkLauncher/GdkLauncher http://ajaxian.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of ff3, if anyone is sick of the bloat , check out webkit-gdk:</p>
<p>svn checkout <a href="http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk" rel="nofollow">http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk</a> WebKit &amp;&amp; \<br />
WebKit/WebKitTools/Scripts/build-webkit &#8211;gdk &amp;&amp; \<br />
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=WebKit/WebKitBuild/Release/lib WebKit/WebKitBuild/Release/WebKitTools/GdkLauncher/GdkLauncher <a href="http://ajaxian.com" rel="nofollow">http://ajaxian.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ix</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251689</link>
		<dc:creator>ix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251689</guid>
		<description>just when i thought SQL might finally start to die.. 

ive got to figure out how ot tweak all this crap out of my .mozconfig to cut down on compile-time and RAM. hopefully you can build without any bookmark support..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just when i thought SQL might finally start to die.. </p>
<p>ive got to figure out how ot tweak all this crap out of my .mozconfig to cut down on compile-time and RAM. hopefully you can build without any bookmark support..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251681</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251681</guid>
		<description>Nicholas, SQLite will be used for all storage in the future. As for Firefox 3, Places = history + bookmarks, download history, and site specific preferences will all be using it (in different db files). In the future I guess passwords and forms will be stored in it as well.
More info here: http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/firefox-3-alpha-5-is-out/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas, SQLite will be used for all storage in the future. As for Firefox 3, Places = history + bookmarks, download history, and site specific preferences will all be using it (in different db files). In the future I guess passwords and forms will be stored in it as well.<br />
More info here: <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/firefox-3-alpha-5-is-out/" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/firefox-3-alpha-5-is-out/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hartmann</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251678</guid>
		<description>Ah, ok. As a book mark system SQLite makes sense... why mention it though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, ok. As a book mark system SQLite makes sense&#8230; why mention it though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251677</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251677</guid>
		<description>the Dom Storage is already using sqlite. At least in FireFox 2... just search for &#039;webappsstore.sqlite&#039;. (it could be that it doesn&#039;t exist and only created when used though, I&#039;m not sure)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Dom Storage is already using sqlite. At least in FireFox 2&#8230; just search for &#8216;webappsstore.sqlite&#8217;. (it could be that it doesn&#8217;t exist and only created when used though, I&#8217;m not sure)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251675</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251675</guid>
		<description>This posting is misleading - the SQLite engine is being used to store bookmarks (&quot;Places&quot;) only, not for use with JavaScript for client-side data storage. We&#039;ll still have to use Google Gears or DOM storage for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This posting is misleading &#8211; the SQLite engine is being used to store bookmarks (&#8220;Places&#8221;) only, not for use with JavaScript for client-side data storage. We&#8217;ll still have to use Google Gears or DOM storage for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickael RÃ©mond</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251674</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickael RÃ©mond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251674</guid>
		<description>Does someone know if the growl notification feature on MacOSX are working with plugin and application or if they can work on XUL pages opened from the web ?
The second option would be nice to provide notification on our IM client OneTeam http://www.oneteam.im/
:)

It is nice to see the Firefox framework improve as it helps us making our technology choice a better long term option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does someone know if the growl notification feature on MacOSX are working with plugin and application or if they can work on XUL pages opened from the web ?<br />
The second option would be nice to provide notification on our IM client OneTeam <a href="http://www.oneteam.im/" rel="nofollow">http://www.oneteam.im/</a><br />
:)</p>
<p>It is nice to see the Firefox framework improve as it helps us making our technology choice a better long term option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251672</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. I thought SQLite was being included as the basis for the new bookmark engine, nothing to do with offline storage for web apps. Or will it be used for both?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. I thought SQLite was being included as the basis for the new bookmark engine, nothing to do with offline storage for web apps. Or will it be used for both?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hartmann</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/firefox-3-sqlite-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-251671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hartmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2496#comment-251671</guid>
		<description>Ok... built in databases? Thats nifty, but until all browsers are running the same DB in the browser, and the market shares are there to support it... whats the point? I know someone has to start the trend, but this likes like 4-6 years out, minimum, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok&#8230; built in databases? Thats nifty, but until all browsers are running the same DB in the browser, and the market shares are there to support it&#8230; whats the point? I know someone has to start the trend, but this likes like 4-6 years out, minimum, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

