<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FireUnit: JavaScript Unit Testing Extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/fireunit-javascript-unit-testing-extension/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/fireunit-javascript-unit-testing-extension</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisInCambo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/fireunit-javascript-unit-testing-extension/comment-page-1#comment-270012</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisInCambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5439#comment-270012</guid>
		<description>Looks nice, especially the event firing stuff. I think I will stick with JSSpec for testing my JavaScipt models, but this will be good for testing the DOM dependent views.

Any chance this could be made to work with Firebug lite so we could run our test suite in other browsers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice, especially the event firing stuff. I think I will stick with JSSpec for testing my JavaScipt models, but this will be good for testing the DOM dependent views.</p>
<p>Any chance this could be made to work with Firebug lite so we could run our test suite in other browsers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgishack</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/fireunit-javascript-unit-testing-extension/comment-page-1#comment-269972</link>
		<dc:creator>cgishack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5439#comment-269972</guid>
		<description>@tj111 Oh yes.. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tj111 Oh yes.. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tj111</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/fireunit-javascript-unit-testing-extension/comment-page-1#comment-269966</link>
		<dc:creator>tj111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5439#comment-269966</guid>
		<description>@cgishack:  If you read the text next to the download link you&#039;ll see why.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
* Download Latest Extension &lt;b&gt;(Requires Firefox 3+ and Firebug 1.2+)&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cgishack:  If you read the text next to the download link you&#8217;ll see why.</p>
<blockquote><p>
* Download Latest Extension <b>(Requires Firefox 3+ and Firebug 1.2+)</b>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgishack</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/fireunit-javascript-unit-testing-extension/comment-page-1#comment-269965</link>
		<dc:creator>cgishack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5439#comment-269965</guid>
		<description>This broke my firebug. I had to uninstall fire unit to get it back.

Running FF 2.0.0.19, FB: 1.05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This broke my firebug. I had to uninstall fire unit to get it back.</p>
<p>Running FF 2.0.0.19, FB: 1.05</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frenchStudent</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/fireunit-javascript-unit-testing-extension/comment-page-1#comment-269957</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchStudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=5439#comment-269957</guid>
		<description>It would have be really cool if it had extended the console object instead of using a new one. Imagine this thing ported to every browser already implementing &quot;console&quot;. Life would be way easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have be really cool if it had extended the console object instead of using a new one. Imagine this thing ported to every browser already implementing &#8220;console&#8221;. Life would be way easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

