<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Fuzzy with jsfunfuzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz/comment-page-1#comment-253955</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz#comment-253955</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had it up running on Konqueror (it required some changes) and have made my patched version available to the the KHTML folk, so I&#039;d imagine so. KJS is reasonably unbuggy from what I&#039;ve seen, only 4 distinct crashes from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had it up running on Konqueror (it required some changes) and have made my patched version available to the the KHTML folk, so I&#8217;d imagine so. KJS is reasonably unbuggy from what I&#8217;ve seen, only 4 distinct crashes from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz/comment-page-1#comment-253749</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz#comment-253749</guid>
		<description>Microsoft will reimplement jsfunfuzz on the .NET 7 platform, to be released in 2011.  Only then will they begin to test IE7 using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft will reimplement jsfunfuzz on the .NET 7 platform, to be released in 2011.  Only then will they begin to test IE7 using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Roderick</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz/comment-page-1#comment-253740</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/getting-fuzzy-with-jsfunfuzz#comment-253740</guid>
		<description>Seems Opera is already using it to iron out bugs in their browser. It wouldn&#039;t suprise me if the WebKit / KHTML teams gives it a spin or two, and correct some of their bugs as well.

Anyone willing to bet on how long it&#039;ll take MS to release a new IE, without bugs found by jsfunfuzz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems Opera is already using it to iron out bugs in their browser. It wouldn&#8217;t suprise me if the WebKit / KHTML teams gives it a spin or two, and correct some of their bugs as well.</p>
<p>Anyone willing to bet on how long it&#8217;ll take MS to release a new IE, without bugs found by jsfunfuzz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

