<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Give Safari some love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mingsai</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-261965</link>
		<dc:creator>mingsai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-261965</guid>
		<description>I really think that Safari could be a winner. The browser is the best performer in the market. I see one thing lacking -the many cool features one gets when opening up the process for add-ins from 3rd party developers. Without the developer support this product will not make it off the launch pad. 

The main feature that is missing is full support for chinese (unicode) fonts. One of the best add-ins from Firefox that I leverage is the Chineseperakun add-in which supports on the fly translations of chinese characters which are moused over. A relatively straight forward implementation of divs and language conversion software that is totally inaccessible to one when using Safari ...

Wonder if one can build an app that will work in Safari to link in google gears?

I fear opportunity to make an impact is slipping away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think that Safari could be a winner. The browser is the best performer in the market. I see one thing lacking -the many cool features one gets when opening up the process for add-ins from 3rd party developers. Without the developer support this product will not make it off the launch pad. </p>
<p>The main feature that is missing is full support for chinese (unicode) fonts. One of the best add-ins from Firefox that I leverage is the Chineseperakun add-in which supports on the fly translations of chinese characters which are moused over. A relatively straight forward implementation of divs and language conversion software that is totally inaccessible to one when using Safari &#8230;</p>
<p>Wonder if one can build an app that will work in Safari to link in google gears?</p>
<p>I fear opportunity to make an impact is slipping away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kunstforum</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-261507</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunstforum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-261507</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this really useful article.Great cheat sheet, I appreciate it very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this really useful article.Great cheat sheet, I appreciate it very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilippSwiss</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-260261</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilippSwiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-260261</guid>
		<description>We use OS X in our acency and I think it is a great OS but Safari is definitely not may favourite. We use Contenido to update our homepage and Safari is just causing problems so I use Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use OS X in our acency and I think it is a great OS but Safari is definitely not may favourite. We use Contenido to update our homepage and Safari is just causing problems so I use Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apotheke</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-257456</link>
		<dc:creator>Apotheke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-257456</guid>
		<description>Thanks for very interesting article. btw. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. Itâ€™s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone elseâ€™s point of viewâ€¦ makes you think more. Itâ€™s really good written and I fully agree with You on main issue, btw. I must say that I really enjoyed reading all of Your posts. Itâ€™s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone elseâ€™s point of viewâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for very interesting article. btw. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. Itâ€™s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone elseâ€™s point of viewâ€¦ makes you think more. Itâ€™s really good written and I fully agree with You on main issue, btw. I must say that I really enjoyed reading all of Your posts. Itâ€™s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone elseâ€™s point of viewâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artikelverzeichnis fÃ¼r Onlineshops</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-257179</link>
		<dc:creator>Artikelverzeichnis fÃ¼r Onlineshops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-257179</guid>
		<description>Thanks for very interesting article. btw. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. Itâ€™s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone elseâ€™s point of viewâ€¦ makes you think more. So please keep up the great work. Greetings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for very interesting article. btw. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. Itâ€™s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone elseâ€™s point of viewâ€¦ makes you think more. So please keep up the great work. Greetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fingerprint</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-253970</link>
		<dc:creator>fingerprint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-253970</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: æ¬å±‹å…¬å¸</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-253737</link>
		<dc:creator>æ¬å±‹å…¬å¸</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-253737</guid>
		<description>itâ€™s a good idea and i like it very much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>itâ€™s a good idea and i like it very much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wow powerleveling</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-250681</link>
		<dc:creator>wow powerleveling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-250681</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a good idea and i like it very much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a good idea and i like it very much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wow power leveling</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-250680</link>
		<dc:creator>wow power leveling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-250680</guid>
		<description>My lord! What a bunch of whiny developers this thread has brought out of the woodwork! Personally I donâ€™t get how developers hell bent on creating standards based sites quibble over support for Safari</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My lord! What a bunch of whiny developers this thread has brought out of the woodwork! Personally I donâ€™t get how developers hell bent on creating standards based sites quibble over support for Safari</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxael</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-160383</link>
		<dc:creator>maxael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-160383</guid>
		<description>The solution is simple, and was forseen by the folks developing Firefox: Apple will integrate Firefox.  Macs are becoming the boutique platform for technophiles world-round!  The have the most elegant UI, the savant user base, and a unix interface to the core system... what more could a cpu-enthusiast want for their laptop?  what?  I&#039;ll tell you... for every webapp produced in the coming onslaught to work, and work correctly!  Watch carefully as Mozilla takes over the developer squadrons... then migrates to email-distributable packages, then becomes the auto-browser, then is everywhere via viral-like spreading techniques.  You see, what makes the virus powerful is the fact is isn&#039;t technically alive (aka. able to survive where none of the &#039;intelligent&#039; can) so it can spread in environments not suited to typical organic lifeforms...  isn&#039;t this the niche Apple sought to thrive in from the beginning?  Remember the hammer?  I suppose we&#039;ll see how things turn out :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution is simple, and was forseen by the folks developing Firefox: Apple will integrate Firefox.  Macs are becoming the boutique platform for technophiles world-round!  The have the most elegant UI, the savant user base, and a unix interface to the core system&#8230; what more could a cpu-enthusiast want for their laptop?  what?  I&#8217;ll tell you&#8230; for every webapp produced in the coming onslaught to work, and work correctly!  Watch carefully as Mozilla takes over the developer squadrons&#8230; then migrates to email-distributable packages, then becomes the auto-browser, then is everywhere via viral-like spreading techniques.  You see, what makes the virus powerful is the fact is isn&#8217;t technically alive (aka. able to survive where none of the &#8216;intelligent&#8217; can) so it can spread in environments not suited to typical organic lifeforms&#8230;  isn&#8217;t this the niche Apple sought to thrive in from the beginning?  Remember the hammer?  I suppose we&#8217;ll see how things turn out :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All About Web Technologies &#187; Browser Warfare, Supporting Safari, and the Future of Macs</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-33170</link>
		<dc:creator>All About Web Technologies &#187; Browser Warfare, Supporting Safari, and the Future of Macs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-33170</guid>
		<description>[...] Leland Scott from Musings From Mars has a couple posts highlighting the never ending browser debates, in particular the Safari issue we have covered before. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leland Scott from Musings From Mars has a couple posts highlighting the never ending browser debates, in particular the Safari issue we have covered before. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdecoursey</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-26278</link>
		<dc:creator>pdecoursey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-26278</guid>
		<description>Maybe I write bad code but I have never had any issues coding for safari, and I usually wait until the last minute to test in safari.  What are the specific issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I write bad code but I have never had any issues coding for safari, and I usually wait until the last minute to test in safari.  What are the specific issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Software &#124; Graphic &#38; Web Design &#124; Multimedia</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-25444</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Software &#124; Graphic &#38; Web Design &#124; Multimedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-25444</guid>
		<description>[...] Leland Scott from Musings From Mars has a couple posts highlighting the never ending browser debates, in particular the Safari issue we have covered before. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leland Scott from Musings From Mars has a couple posts highlighting the never ending browser debates, in particular the Safari issue we have covered before. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill Kenoyer</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-19942</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill Kenoyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-19942</guid>
		<description>Still nobody has answered my question.  What is wrong with Safari?  What is broken or whatever.  

I&#039;ve been writing web sites for years for Safari and I have never ran into any problems.  And yes, lots of Javascript and AJAX stuff.

The only browser that I ever have problems with is MSIE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still nobody has answered my question.  What is wrong with Safari?  What is broken or whatever.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been writing web sites for years for Safari and I have never ran into any problems.  And yes, lots of Javascript and AJAX stuff.</p>
<p>The only browser that I ever have problems with is MSIE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stchur</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-15231</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stchur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 01:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-15231</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that web developers need to support Safari.  Safari needs to support web developers.

Apple needs to ensure that its browser follows javascript standards more closely.  Rather than forcing web developers to accomodate how their browser works.  They should update their browser to work with how web developers already develop!  (It&#039;s in their best interest)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that web developers need to support Safari.  Safari needs to support web developers.</p>
<p>Apple needs to ensure that its browser follows javascript standards more closely.  Rather than forcing web developers to accomodate how their browser works.  They should update their browser to work with how web developers already develop!  (It&#8217;s in their best interest)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makki Studios &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Give Safari some love</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-14846</link>
		<dc:creator>Makki Studios &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Give Safari some love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 11:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-14846</guid>
		<description>[...] Read full editorial here  Ajaxian.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read full editorial here  Ajaxian.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panasonic Youth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Browser bugs - onblur and onfocus with IFrames</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-13050</link>
		<dc:creator>Panasonic Youth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Browser bugs - onblur and onfocus with IFrames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 07:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-13050</guid>
		<description>[...] Totally simple, and if you have hit this snag its probably second nature. The first time, though, its pretty painful. And of course, this still doesn&#039;t work in Safari. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Totally simple, and if you have hit this snag its probably second nature. The first time, though, its pretty painful. And of course, this still doesn&#8217;t work in Safari. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-12807</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 19:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-12807</guid>
		<description>@Leland Scott
You&#039;re telling all these JavaScript developers that they don&#039;t know what they&#039;re talking about? Give me a break. CSS != JavaScript by the way. I&#039;m all for browsers passing the ACID test, but if there was a JSACID test, Safari would fail. IE probably would too, but Safari is a big mistake on Apple&#039;s part, and they would get a lot of positive feedback if they put their efforts into FireFox instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leland Scott<br />
You&#8217;re telling all these JavaScript developers that they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re talking about? Give me a break. CSS != JavaScript by the way. I&#8217;m all for browsers passing the ACID test, but if there was a JSACID test, Safari would fail. IE probably would too, but Safari is a big mistake on Apple&#8217;s part, and they would get a lot of positive feedback if they put their efforts into FireFox instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-12805</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-12805</guid>
		<description>@Leland Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leland Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poncho</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love/comment-page-2#comment-11772</link>
		<dc:creator>Poncho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 03:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/give-safari-some-love#comment-11772</guid>
		<description>I gotta say I&#039;m pretty annoyed by this. Although I&#039;m a professional web developer and I use FireFox on my Mac (mainly for the developer related extensions), Safari IS still the default browser on a Mac and I use it dailly. For the average Mac user, Safari is the default browser for a reason, so that is the browser they use. It is also the third most widely used browser right now.

Ok, it does have it&#039;s annoyances and incompatiblities, but instead of dropping support for it (or in some cases just barring access based on the user agent), we (the collective of web developers) should be actively supporting the development of Web Kit and submitting bugs when encountered.

You can hope and wish Apple will ditch Safari and make Firefox the default browser, but that is not going to make it happen. Remember that Web Kit was (eventually) made [properly] Open Source after the KHTML team complained that Apple were taking what they wanted from the Open Source community without giving back. I doubt very much that Apple would ditch it especially since Safari isn&#039;t the only Apple application running Web Kit, other such applications are Mail &amp; Dashboard.

To sum up: Most of these &quot;Web Toolkits&quot; and &quot;Frameworks&quot; are already having to cater to multiple rendering engines, javascript interpreters and XMLHttpRequest methods. DEAL WITH IT, we&#039;re lucky that there are three main browsers that are pretty closely matched for the most part, there is no NetScape 4 to worry about anymore!

Cheers;
Poncho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say I&#8217;m pretty annoyed by this. Although I&#8217;m a professional web developer and I use FireFox on my Mac (mainly for the developer related extensions), Safari IS still the default browser on a Mac and I use it dailly. For the average Mac user, Safari is the default browser for a reason, so that is the browser they use. It is also the third most widely used browser right now.</p>
<p>Ok, it does have it&#8217;s annoyances and incompatiblities, but instead of dropping support for it (or in some cases just barring access based on the user agent), we (the collective of web developers) should be actively supporting the development of Web Kit and submitting bugs when encountered.</p>
<p>You can hope and wish Apple will ditch Safari and make Firefox the default browser, but that is not going to make it happen. Remember that Web Kit was (eventually) made [properly] Open Source after the KHTML team complained that Apple were taking what they wanted from the Open Source community without giving back. I doubt very much that Apple would ditch it especially since Safari isn&#8217;t the only Apple application running Web Kit, other such applications are Mail &amp; Dashboard.</p>
<p>To sum up: Most of these &#8220;Web Toolkits&#8221; and &#8220;Frameworks&#8221; are already having to cater to multiple rendering engines, javascript interpreters and XMLHttpRequest methods. DEAL WITH IT, we&#8217;re lucky that there are three main browsers that are pretty closely matched for the most part, there is no NetScape 4 to worry about anymore!</p>
<p>Cheers;<br />
Poncho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

