<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail gets a JavaScript facelift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:30:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ccqqseo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-278073</link>
		<dc:creator>ccqqseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-278073</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sino-purification.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;oil purifier&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sino-purification.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;oil purification&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fighteroptics.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;waterproof binoculars&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fighteroptics.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;zoom binoculars&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fighteroptics.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;8x42 binoculars&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fighteroptics.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;8x21 binoculars&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dustinart.com/drhsiao/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;??????&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sino-purification.com/" rel="nofollow">oil purifier</a><br />
<a href="http://www.sino-purification.com/" rel="nofollow">oil purification</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fighteroptics.com/" rel="nofollow">waterproof binoculars</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fighteroptics.com/" rel="nofollow">zoom binoculars</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fighteroptics.com/" rel="nofollow">8&#215;42 binoculars</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fighteroptics.com/" rel="nofollow">8&#215;21 binoculars</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dustinart.com/drhsiao/" rel="nofollow">??????</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wuxiseo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-276849</link>
		<dc:creator>wuxiseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-276849</guid>
		<description>A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millybridal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wedding dresses&lt;/a&gt; is always 

expensive. Every couple will agree on this.When you are planning for 

your wedding, you will probably find that every item can be very 

expensive. This is especially true when it comes to the wedding dress.
You may think that there is no way for you to get a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millybridal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wedding gown dress&lt;/a&gt;which is 

elegant and at the same time cheap. However, I can tell you that there 

are some ways to save money on this item.
So, the question here is how to make your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millybridal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;white wedding dress&lt;/a&gt;inexpensive.
In fact, one thing you need to understand is that it is totally 

possible for you to find a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millybridal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cheap 

wedding dress&lt;/a&gt; which is also elegant and beautiful. You do not need 

to sacrifice the quality just because you will need to search for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millybridal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cheap wedding gowns&lt;/a&gt; items.
As a matter of fact, one of the ways to get a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millybridal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bridal gowns&lt;/a&gt; is to wear the one 

your mother wore when she got married. The point here is that you will 

be wearing a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.millybridal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bridal dresses&lt;/a&gt; 

item and it will certainly be very stylish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.millybridal.com" rel="nofollow">wedding dresses</a> is always </p>
<p>expensive. Every couple will agree on this.When you are planning for </p>
<p>your wedding, you will probably find that every item can be very </p>
<p>expensive. This is especially true when it comes to the wedding dress.<br />
You may think that there is no way for you to get a <a href="http://www.millybridal.com" rel="nofollow">Wedding gown dress</a>which is </p>
<p>elegant and at the same time cheap. However, I can tell you that there </p>
<p>are some ways to save money on this item.<br />
So, the question here is how to make your <a href="http://www.millybridal.com" rel="nofollow">white wedding dress</a>inexpensive.<br />
In fact, one thing you need to understand is that it is totally </p>
<p>possible for you to find a <a href="http://www.millybridal.com" rel="nofollow">cheap </p>
<p>wedding dress</a> which is also elegant and beautiful. You do not need </p>
<p>to sacrifice the quality just because you will need to search for <a href="http://www.millybridal.com" rel="nofollow">cheap wedding gowns</a> items.<br />
As a matter of fact, one of the ways to get a <a href="http://www.millybridal.com" rel="nofollow">bridal gowns</a> is to wear the one </p>
<p>your mother wore when she got married. The point here is that you will </p>
<p>be wearing a <a href="http://www.millybridal.com" rel="nofollow">bridal dresses</a> </p>
<p>item and it will certainly be very stylish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design NY</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258983</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258983</guid>
		<description>This is the way to go when you make a product... You must try to reach perfection.

@brain, you can always use the HTML UI or just use a POP3 client, it would be a lot faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the way to go when you make a product&#8230; You must try to reach perfection.</p>
<p>@brain, you can always use the HTML UI or just use a POP3 client, it would be a lot faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uriel Katz</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258510</link>
		<dc:creator>Uriel Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258510</guid>
		<description>@brain:did you disable firebug? it eats all your memory when it tries to log all XHR requests</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brain:did you disable firebug? it eats all your memory when it tries to log all XHR requests</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brain</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258041</link>
		<dc:creator>brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258041</guid>
		<description>interesting article and a more in-depth follow up would be stellar.  One thing i&#039;d like to here more about is memory management.  Gmail really eats up RAM, at least as far as firefox is concerned.  I&#039;ve never encountered a situation where I wished Gmail was &quot;faster&quot;, there have, however, been many times where I wished it was lighter (as far as memory usage, not JS payload).

-cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting article and a more in-depth follow up would be stellar.  One thing i&#8217;d like to here more about is memory management.  Gmail really eats up RAM, at least as far as firefox is concerned.  I&#8217;ve never encountered a situation where I wished Gmail was &#8220;faster&#8221;, there have, however, been many times where I wished it was lighter (as far as memory usage, not JS payload).</p>
<p>-cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Holton</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Holton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258038</guid>
		<description>awesome post, thanks, Dion.  This is the type of post I love -- Engineers sharing their own insights into what they do, how they do it, etc.  ...I can&#039;t wait for Gmail to be Gears-enabled as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome post, thanks, Dion.  This is the type of post I love &#8212; Engineers sharing their own insights into what they do, how they do it, etc.  &#8230;I can&#8217;t wait for Gmail to be Gears-enabled as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258034</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258034</guid>
		<description>Oh, and additionally, I doubt Microsoft would &lt;strong&gt;really&lt;/strong&gt; mind Google making its products work better in IE, so MS doesn&#039;t have to do the work themselves of making JS perform better. I bet they turn a blind eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and additionally, I doubt Microsoft would <strong>really</strong> mind Google making its products work better in IE, so MS doesn&#8217;t have to do the work themselves of making JS perform better. I bet they turn a blind eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258033</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258033</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Hmm. So a Google Engineer reverse-engineered jscript.dll. I am not so sure the DMCA covers this. And i doubt MS gave written agreement to Google.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Is it illegal under DMCA to reverse-engineer something for the purpose of learning how it works, while building something against its API rather than building something that implements some or all of its features?

Like, there&#039;s a huge difference between (I think this is excepted in the DMCA but it&#039;s just illustrative of my point) reverse-engineering a microprocessor to build a compatible microprocessor, on the one hand, and reverse-engineering a microprocessor to write a better-optimized compiler, on the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Hmm. So a Google Engineer reverse-engineered jscript.dll. I am not so sure the DMCA covers this. And i doubt MS gave written agreement to Google.</p></blockquote>
<p> Is it illegal under DMCA to reverse-engineer something for the purpose of learning how it works, while building something against its API rather than building something that implements some or all of its features?</p>
<p>Like, there&#8217;s a huge difference between (I think this is excepted in the DMCA but it&#8217;s just illustrative of my point) reverse-engineering a microprocessor to build a compatible microprocessor, on the one hand, and reverse-engineering a microprocessor to write a better-optimized compiler, on the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lhe</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258032</link>
		<dc:creator>lhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258032</guid>
		<description>Hmm. So a Google Engineer reverse-engineered jscript.dll. I am not so sure the DMCA covers this. And i doubt MS gave written agreement to Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. So a Google Engineer reverse-engineered jscript.dll. I am not so sure the DMCA covers this. And i doubt MS gave written agreement to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258031</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258031</guid>
		<description>As far as speed improvements... I don&#039;t know how much benefit I&#039;m going to see. I have never, ever, found myself waiting for responses from gmail on anything but search for more than a tiny fraction of a second, and I&#039;ve never felt anything resembling lag, except when I&#039;m having network trouble besides.

I&#039;ve been generally impressed by Gmail&#039;s speed. The launch could be a bit quicker, but I really only launch every time it logs me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as speed improvements&#8230; I don&#8217;t know how much benefit I&#8217;m going to see. I have never, ever, found myself waiting for responses from gmail on anything but search for more than a tiny fraction of a second, and I&#8217;ve never felt anything resembling lag, except when I&#8217;m having network trouble besides.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been generally impressed by Gmail&#8217;s speed. The launch could be a bit quicker, but I really only launch every time it logs me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James MacFarlane</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258017</link>
		<dc:creator>James MacFarlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258017</guid>
		<description>This kind of programming reminds me of my Commodore 64 days. Every byte counts. Every clock cycle counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of programming reminds me of my Commodore 64 days. Every byte counts. Every clock cycle counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kuhnert</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-258003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kuhnert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-258003</guid>
		<description>Hehe...you guys are completely insane.  Nice work. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe&#8230;you guys are completely insane.  Nice work. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift/comment-page-1#comment-257999</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/gmail-gets-a-javascript-facelift#comment-257999</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great, gmail is kind of laggy sometimes. I hope they spent some time lowering the login time as well because that&#039;s the one that&#039;s been bothering me the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great, gmail is kind of laggy sometimes. I hope they spent some time lowering the login time as well because that&#8217;s the one that&#8217;s been bothering me the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
