Comments on: Google launches JavaScript API that allows you to write back

By: aumkii

aumkii — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:57:12 +0000

i try to run this code but i got the error message like

” google.accounts is undefined ” please help me to authenticate the google

my code is :

logMeIn();
function logMeIn() {
scope = “http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds”;
var token = google.accounts.user.login(scope);
alert(token);

}

please email me the Solution i need to authenticate the fiance Google finance API

my id : damu.be@gmail.com

By: aumkii

aumkii — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:55:26 +0000

i try to run this code but i got the error message like

” google.accounts is undefined ” please help me to authenticate the google

my code is :

logMeIn();
function logMeIn() {
scope = “http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds”;
var token = google.accounts.user.login(scope);
alert(token);

}

By: sav74sac

sav74sac — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:23:08 +0000

That is great, but makes it a bit complicated when you take into account all the API conditions a developer will have to figure out to get a simple task done. There is a service, AppPad http://AppPad.com, which provides a much simpler way to store data without hosting/databases. (build & host apps in Javascript)

By: Travis Wilson

Travis Wilson — Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:22:30 +0000

> “I am excited about this, as it means that you can write a rich Ajax client that doesn’t need server-side proxies to do these things”

Someone is missing the usual point of server-side proxies, which is to control access to stateful services. This is the equivalent of opening your database ports directly to the world. There will always be stateless server-side proxies to data; it’s the best way to scale connectivity, no matter what anyone develops on the client side.

By: DESIGNEXPANSE.COM

DESIGNEXPANSE.COM — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:49:44 +0000

No doubt google always works for the best for their users. Google shows in their all the project the different approach normally which is not using anywhere. I have not even experience this but I am going to check this and hope this will be a great as well.

By: rektide

rektide — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:40:00 +0000

i believe you could DIY all this with XHR already. rather than improve the client libraries, i would have much preferred it if Google Data protocol now permitted JSON for submitting/posting/updating data.

By: Christian Decker

Christian Decker — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:26:38 +0000

There seems to be a small error in the post: the code does not immediately log in, instead it logs you in when calling the logMeIn-function.
As for mikes comment: this looks similar to the OpenID phishing problem, I hope we get this fixed soon.

By: mikael bergkvist

mikael bergkvist — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:08:21 +0000

By the way, it’s a smalltimer, sure, but still, the http://www.widgetplus.com framework also allows read/write data and the managing/creation of new accounts.

By: mikael bergkvist

mikael bergkvist — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:59:12 +0000

Somewhere along the way, we will all realise that you cant endlessly protect people anymore.
You might compare this to the street life in a city, at some point people will have to grow up and take care of themselves.
Developers can’t do that for them in the long run.

By: Tommy Valand

Tommy Valand — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:17:19 +0000

If I understood the talk correctly, you have to log in on the -actual- google-page -and- allow the service provider access to your data.

By: mike

mike — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:43:05 +0000

Now all we have to do is wait for this sort of thing to become mainstream, and then create a fake Google login page and offer to ‘import your calendar items’ and voila, you have someones Google account.

I’ll make a social website where you can show off your bank account balance, all I need you to do is click this link and enter your username and password. “Easy money!”