<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gopher away in JavaScript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/gopher-away-in-javascript/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gopher-away-in-javascript</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankThuerigen</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gopher-away-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-266612</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankThuerigen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4076#comment-266612</guid>
		<description>@John: in my opinion ( which is not a very educated one on this issue ) mozilla has a heritage in supporting this protocol.  In this way it is a matter of continuity for mozilla to keep on supporting it. I think much of mozillas charm derives from these things also. These things = do not drop anything because the business number indicate so... as certain other companies do ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: in my opinion ( which is not a very educated one on this issue ) mozilla has a heritage in supporting this protocol.  In this way it is a matter of continuity for mozilla to keep on supporting it. I think much of mozillas charm derives from these things also. These things = do not drop anything because the business number indicate so&#8230; as certain other companies do ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnResig</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gopher-away-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-266603</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnResig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4076#comment-266603</guid>
		<description>@slaniel: One would think that - but if you were to read the comments on the bug that I pointed to you would find a lot of people VERY angrily suggesting otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@slaniel: One would think that &#8211; but if you were to read the comments on the bug that I pointed to you would find a lot of people VERY angrily suggesting otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slaniel</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gopher-away-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-266602</link>
		<dc:creator>slaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4076#comment-266602</guid>
		<description>Seems to be such a niche protocol that it ought to be implemented as a plugin, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to be such a niche protocol that it ought to be implemented as a plugin, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnResig</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/gopher-away-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-266601</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnResig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4076#comment-266601</guid>
		<description>It should be noted that Firefox already has support for Gopher but it is in the process of being removed:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388195

This patch implements Gopher in a pure-JavaScript manner, allowing it to persist within Firefox but incur much less overhead in the process. More details about the patch:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388195#c71</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that Firefox already has support for Gopher but it is in the process of being removed:<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388195" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388195</a></p>
<p>This patch implements Gopher in a pure-JavaScript manner, allowing it to persist within Firefox but incur much less overhead in the process. More details about the patch:<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388195#c71" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388195#c71</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

