<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greasemonkey, Chrome Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/greasemonkey-chrome-edition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/greasemonkey-chrome-edition</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:51:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SteveMcGarrett</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/greasemonkey-chrome-edition/comment-page-1#comment-268380</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveMcGarrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4842#comment-268380</guid>
		<description>At least someone is on the ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least someone is on the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mauvecargo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/greasemonkey-chrome-edition/comment-page-1#comment-268307</link>
		<dc:creator>mauvecargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4842#comment-268307</guid>
		<description>Here are some great examples about how we wan use Greasemonkey in : http://jcargoo.blogspot.com/2008/10/discover-greasemonkey-for-firefox.html

I think that Chrome did a right choice by including Greasemonkey support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some great examples about how we wan use Greasemonkey in : <a href="http://jcargoo.blogspot.com/2008/10/discover-greasemonkey-for-firefox.html" rel="nofollow">http://jcargoo.blogspot.com/2008/10/discover-greasemonkey-for-firefox.html</a></p>
<p>I think that Chrome did a right choice by including Greasemonkey support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mushon</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/greasemonkey-chrome-edition/comment-page-1#comment-268286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mushon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4842#comment-268286</guid>
		<description>Great news indeed!
I think it would make sense to use the Greasemonkey API as the basis for a user-JS standard to be adopted by all browsers. It is needed and and has the potential to democratize interface. Obviously, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ShiftSpace&quot; title=&quot;ShiftSpace&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;we at ShiftSpace&lt;/a&gt; have a lot of interest in seeing this happen, and some ideas (and experience) of how it should be implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news indeed!<br />
I think it would make sense to use the Greasemonkey API as the basis for a user-JS standard to be adopted by all browsers. It is needed and and has the potential to democratize interface. Obviously, <a href="http://www.ShiftSpace" title="ShiftSpace" rel="nofollow">we at ShiftSpace</a> have a lot of interest in seeing this happen, and some ideas (and experience) of how it should be implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V1</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/greasemonkey-chrome-edition/comment-page-1#comment-268272</link>
		<dc:creator>V1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4842#comment-268272</guid>
		<description>They should also implement it in webkit ^-^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should also implement it in webkit ^-^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
