<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GUIMark: Another Web application benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/guimark-another-web-application-benchmark/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/guimark-another-web-application-benchmark</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:51:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/guimark-another-web-application-benchmark/comment-page-1#comment-264046</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3678#comment-264046</guid>
		<description>Although in my tests FF had the lowest score, I would also like to add that I also did some custom benchmarks on first-time rendering of a bunch of generated elements. The first time they are rendered FF is many times faster than IE. That being said FF is still a bit too slow for my liking for dynamically resizing already existing elements. Maybe the final build won&#039;t have this problem, I can only hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although in my tests FF had the lowest score, I would also like to add that I also did some custom benchmarks on first-time rendering of a bunch of generated elements. The first time they are rendered FF is many times faster than IE. That being said FF is still a bit too slow for my liking for dynamically resizing already existing elements. Maybe the final build won&#8217;t have this problem, I can only hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craftymind</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/guimark-another-web-application-benchmark/comment-page-1#comment-264042</link>
		<dc:creator>Craftymind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3678#comment-264042</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the writeup Dion. I actually wrote this benchmark while I was developing eBay Desktop which has transitional effects that are comparable to whats being stressed in the test. Technically only the stars are being scaled in by the renderer, the rest of the benchmark is actually testing resizing, relayout and x y motion. Many popular sites are using resizing transitions which is why I thought it would be relevant. Both Digg and Slashdots commenting system implement resizing div containers, richer apps like Sliderocket and Buzzword have to reflow text and animate in panels. Sites like Twitter and Facebook will alpha fade in new user activity. Of course most people aren&#039;t going to add all these things in at once, but then I wouldn&#039;t be left with much of a benchmark :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the writeup Dion. I actually wrote this benchmark while I was developing eBay Desktop which has transitional effects that are comparable to whats being stressed in the test. Technically only the stars are being scaled in by the renderer, the rest of the benchmark is actually testing resizing, relayout and x y motion. Many popular sites are using resizing transitions which is why I thought it would be relevant. Both Digg and Slashdots commenting system implement resizing div containers, richer apps like Sliderocket and Buzzword have to reflow text and animate in panels. Sites like Twitter and Facebook will alpha fade in new user activity. Of course most people aren&#8217;t going to add all these things in at once, but then I wouldn&#8217;t be left with much of a benchmark :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/guimark-another-web-application-benchmark/comment-page-1#comment-264034</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3678#comment-264034</guid>
		<description>Ahem, I also forgot I had Firebug turned on.

Unfortunately disabling Firebug only improved FF&#039;s score by 1fps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem, I also forgot I had Firebug turned on.</p>
<p>Unfortunately disabling Firebug only improved FF&#8217;s score by 1fps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/guimark-another-web-application-benchmark/comment-page-1#comment-264033</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3678#comment-264033</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I was running Opera 9.27.

Opera 9.50b2: 22fps

Which means Opera is the winner (for now)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I was running Opera 9.27.</p>
<p>Opera 9.50b2: 22fps</p>
<p>Which means Opera is the winner (for now)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/guimark-another-web-application-benchmark/comment-page-1#comment-264031</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3678#comment-264031</guid>
		<description>My results for the HTML benchmark:

FF3 RC1: 5fps
Opera 9.50b2: 14fps
Safari 3.1.1: 13fps (varies)
IE7: 17.5fps (wasn&#039;t expecting that)
IE6: 12fps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My results for the HTML benchmark:</p>
<p>FF3 RC1: 5fps<br />
Opera 9.50b2: 14fps<br />
Safari 3.1.1: 13fps (varies)<br />
IE7: 17.5fps (wasn&#8217;t expecting that)<br />
IE6: 12fps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
