Comments on: Improved Readability for JavaScript Unit Tests http://ajaxian.com/archives/improved-readability-for-javascript-unit-tests Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: cjohansen http://ajaxian.com/archives/improved-readability-for-javascript-unit-tests/comment-page-1#comment-272409 cjohansen Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:16:03 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=6453#comment-272409 Indeed they do, hadn't seen them before. The only difference is the syntax. I liked the JShoulda syntax, but the Sugartest syntax did not appeal to me. Way too jQuery-ish (ie long chains). It all boils down to taste though, the important part is that you test in a environment your comfortable with :) Indeed they do, hadn’t seen them before. The only difference is the syntax. I liked the JShoulda syntax, but the Sugartest syntax did not appeal to me. Way too jQuery-ish (ie long chains).

It all boils down to taste though, the important part is that you test in a environment your comfortable with :)

]]> By: smith http://ajaxian.com/archives/improved-readability-for-javascript-unit-tests/comment-page-1#comment-272407 smith Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:57:28 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=6453#comment-272407 Looks similar to Choan Galvez's projects: http://jshoulda.scriptia.net/ http://sugartest.scriptia.net/ Looks similar to Choan Galvez’s projects:

http://jshoulda.scriptia.net/
http://sugartest.scriptia.net/

]]>