<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java in JavaScript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlrobinson</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-263257</link>
		<dc:creator>tlrobinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript#comment-263257</guid>
		<description>Ok, but why? IMO, the only strength of Java is the multitudes of libraries available for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, but why? IMO, the only strength of Java is the multitudes of libraries available for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andytesti</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-263240</link>
		<dc:creator>andytesti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript#comment-263240</guid>
		<description>@naikrovek: This seems to be a JVM implementation, not a Java to JavaScript translation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@naikrovek: This seems to be a JVM implementation, not a Java to JavaScript translation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naikrovek</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-263238</link>
		<dc:creator>naikrovek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript#comment-263238</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t this what the Google Web Toolkit does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t this what the Google Web Toolkit does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadcabbit</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-263231</link>
		<dc:creator>deadcabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript#comment-263231</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m wrong here (and bit offtopic too), but Resig had a nice article about timeouts and intervals and I don&#039;t think it can be used for &quot;simulating&quot; multithreading. But that&#039;s my two cents, and of course it&#039;s good to see this new renessaince of the Javascript we have nowdays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m wrong here (and bit offtopic too), but Resig had a nice article about timeouts and intervals and I don&#8217;t think it can be used for &#8220;simulating&#8221; multithreading. But that&#8217;s my two cents, and of course it&#8217;s good to see this new renessaince of the Javascript we have nowdays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akky</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-263223</link>
		<dc:creator>akky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/java-in-javascript#comment-263223</guid>
		<description>Actially, I saw Orto in 2005. It seems to be released in 2004 or even earlier, which means ealier than the word Ajax. Quite impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actially, I saw Orto in 2005. It seems to be released in 2004 or even earlier, which means ealier than the word Ajax. Quite impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

