Comments on: JavaScript Plugins; The beauty of loosely coupled code http://ajaxian.com/archives/javascript-plugins-the-beauty-of-loosely-coupled-code Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: ibolmo http://ajaxian.com/archives/javascript-plugins-the-beauty-of-loosely-coupled-code/comment-page-1#comment-265681 ibolmo Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:09:20 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/javascript-plugins-the-beauty-of-loosely-coupled-code#comment-265681 I still don't see what the big fuss is. $.fn is just the prototype -- that is common to all JavaScript. See: http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/src/core.js#L32 Maybe I misunderstood where the praise was going, but the praise should go to JavaScript for being prototypal and referencing Objects. I still don’t see what the big fuss is. $.fn is just the prototype — that is common to all JavaScript.

See: http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/src/core.js#L32

Maybe I misunderstood where the praise was going, but the praise should go to JavaScript for being prototypal and referencing Objects.

]]> By: ilazarte http://ajaxian.com/archives/javascript-plugins-the-beauty-of-loosely-coupled-code/comment-page-1#comment-265647 ilazarte Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:41:00 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/javascript-plugins-the-beauty-of-loosely-coupled-code#comment-265647 the only thing I'm not too thrilled about is the lack of namespacing for jquery plugins... Let's say you develop an autocomplete plugin and i develop and autocomplete plugin... i can't use the different implementations on the same page. i tried briefly to get around this in jquery, but gave up. Any suggestions? the only thing I’m not too thrilled about is the lack of namespacing for jquery plugins…

Let’s say you develop an autocomplete plugin and i develop and autocomplete plugin…

i can’t use the different implementations on the same page.

i tried briefly to get around this in jquery, but gave up. Any suggestions?

]]>