<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery 1.4 is released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMark</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-278131</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-278131</guid>
		<description>Why is this rag still posting puff pieces on this dubious script?  It&#039;s beyond laughable to talk about &quot;improvements to attr&quot;, speed (it&#039;s always been a tortoise) and nonsense like:-

&quot;f you want to ensure that “this” inside a function will be permanently bound to a particular value, you can use jQuery.proxy to return a new function with that scope&quot;

Scope?!  What does - this - have to do with scope?  The &quot;experts&quot; can&#039;t even speak the language, so they sure as hell can&#039;t lead neophytes anywhere but off a cliff.  ;)  And how is another &quot;hitch&quot; function supposed to be a breakthrough feature?  It&#039;s basic bullshit.  And you can bet they have introduced new and exciting memory leaks with that too.  ;)

And how is it that these gushing pinheads can&#039;t seem to find the only real browser scripting news that is out there right now?  They know what it is, but theyduhwanna write about it.  :(  Hi Dion and Ben.  You have _zero_ credibility as a news source.  Zip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this rag still posting puff pieces on this dubious script?  It&#8217;s beyond laughable to talk about &#8220;improvements to attr&#8221;, speed (it&#8217;s always been a tortoise) and nonsense like:-</p>
<p>&#8220;f you want to ensure that “this” inside a function will be permanently bound to a particular value, you can use jQuery.proxy to return a new function with that scope&#8221;</p>
<p>Scope?!  What does &#8211; this &#8211; have to do with scope?  The &#8220;experts&#8221; can&#8217;t even speak the language, so they sure as hell can&#8217;t lead neophytes anywhere but off a cliff.  ;)  And how is another &#8220;hitch&#8221; function supposed to be a breakthrough feature?  It&#8217;s basic bullshit.  And you can bet they have introduced new and exciting memory leaks with that too.  ;)</p>
<p>And how is it that these gushing pinheads can&#8217;t seem to find the only real browser scripting news that is out there right now?  They know what it is, but theyduhwanna write about it.  :(  Hi Dion and Ben.  You have _zero_ credibility as a news source.  Zip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aphrodisiac</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-278126</link>
		<dc:creator>Aphrodisiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-278126</guid>
		<description>Excellent thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmyw</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-278052</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmyw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-278052</guid>
		<description>Very excited about jquery 1.4, especially the performance enhancements and per property easing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very excited about jquery 1.4, especially the performance enhancements and per property easing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csuwldcat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277936</link>
		<dc:creator>csuwldcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277936</guid>
		<description>@sixtyseconds - Yeah I saw transmorph in the forge, but still need to give props to jQuery because it was based off of their good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sixtyseconds &#8211; Yeah I saw transmorph in the forge, but still need to give props to jQuery because it was based off of their good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosamez</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277934</link>
		<dc:creator>rosamez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277934</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit sad that .require did not make it and that .proxy has no currying, but in the end I&#039;m really really having fun with the new functions :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit sad that .require did not make it and that .proxy has no currying, but in the end I&#8217;m really really having fun with the new functions :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixtyseconds</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277933</link>
		<dc:creator>sixtyseconds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277933</guid>
		<description>@csuwldcat - See http://mootools.net/forge/p/fx_transmorph. You give MooTools fans a bad name with your constant, unprovoked ranting though...You should have a doctor take a look at that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@csuwldcat &#8211; See <a href="http://mootools.net/forge/p/fx_transmorph" rel="nofollow">http://mootools.net/forge/p/fx_transmorph</a>. You give MooTools fans a bad name with your constant, unprovoked ranting though&#8230;You should have a doctor take a look at that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csuwldcat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277932</link>
		<dc:creator>csuwldcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277932</guid>
		<description>To jQuery&#039;s credit though, the different easing per property feature is really cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To jQuery&#8217;s credit though, the different easing per property feature is really cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csuwldcat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277931</link>
		<dc:creator>csuwldcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277931</guid>
		<description>LMFAO! jQuery must like mustard, because the really love playing katch-up...  Just in case anyone hasn&#039;t been out of their jCave in quite a while, tons of the features in this 1.4 release are features that have been in Mootools/Prototype for YEARS...here are a few that really make me say &quot;Holy guacamole Batman, you JUST figured this out?!?&quot;

Passing Attributes to jQuery(…) - duh, duh, and one more thing, duh.
---
Binding Multiple Event Handlers - see above, and for chr*st sake people you should ALWAYS have been able to pass in multiple props/events/attrs etc via an object in these frameworks, if you couldn&#039;t before they screwed the pooch. Period
---
Controlling a Function&#039;s Context - uh, this actually came from Protoype JS, regardless of this &quot;feature&quot; being in 1.4, you should know that jQuery calls it &quot;.proxy()&quot; because it has always used the now native function context modifying method &quot;.bind()&quot; improperly to set event handlers - so in truth, this is not a feature, it is a work-around for not keeping up to date with javascript, tear ;(
---
Delay an Animation Queue - see Mootools 1.1, circa 2006
---
Check if an Element Has Something - gee, ya think?
---
Oh, but feel free to continue with the &quot;OMG IE7 created tabbed browsing&quot; party...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMFAO! jQuery must like mustard, because the really love playing katch-up&#8230;  Just in case anyone hasn&#8217;t been out of their jCave in quite a while, tons of the features in this 1.4 release are features that have been in Mootools/Prototype for YEARS&#8230;here are a few that really make me say &#8220;Holy guacamole Batman, you JUST figured this out?!?&#8221;</p>
<p>Passing Attributes to jQuery(…) &#8211; duh, duh, and one more thing, duh.<br />
&#8212;<br />
Binding Multiple Event Handlers &#8211; see above, and for chr*st sake people you should ALWAYS have been able to pass in multiple props/events/attrs etc via an object in these frameworks, if you couldn&#8217;t before they screwed the pooch. Period<br />
&#8212;<br />
Controlling a Function&#8217;s Context &#8211; uh, this actually came from Protoype JS, regardless of this &#8220;feature&#8221; being in 1.4, you should know that jQuery calls it &#8220;.proxy()&#8221; because it has always used the now native function context modifying method &#8220;.bind()&#8221; improperly to set event handlers &#8211; so in truth, this is not a feature, it is a work-around for not keeping up to date with javascript, tear ;(<br />
&#8212;<br />
Delay an Animation Queue &#8211; see Mootools 1.1, circa 2006<br />
&#8212;<br />
Check if an Element Has Something &#8211; gee, ya think?<br />
&#8212;<br />
Oh, but feel free to continue with the &#8220;OMG IE7 created tabbed browsing&#8221; party&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DamirSecki</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277930</link>
		<dc:creator>DamirSecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277930</guid>
		<description>@jhiswin:
use google load api to load jquery... and most users won&#039;t even notice since it&#039;ll go from their cache</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jhiswin:<br />
use google load api to load jquery&#8230; and most users won&#8217;t even notice since it&#8217;ll go from their cache</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArianStolwijk</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277925</link>
		<dc:creator>ArianStolwijk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277925</guid>
		<description>@mmurph211: That was just the first thing I thought. And it does work great in MooTools.

Anyway, congrats for jQuery !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mmurph211: That was just the first thing I thought. And it does work great in MooTools.</p>
<p>Anyway, congrats for jQuery !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miraglia</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277924</link>
		<dc:creator>miraglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277924</guid>
		<description>John gave a nice preview of jQuery 1.4 at Yahoo last month in the second half of this talk:

http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/theater/video.php?v=resig-testing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John gave a nice preview of jQuery 1.4 at Yahoo last month in the second half of this talk:</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/theater/video.php?v=resig-testing" rel="nofollow">http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/theater/video.php?v=resig-testing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iliad</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277917</link>
		<dc:creator>iliad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277917</guid>
		<description>Some very interesting changes. I in particularly like the improved setter methods, as well as the focusin/out events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very interesting changes. I in particularly like the improved setter methods, as well as the focusin/out events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277912</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277912</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; And Joe Walker will be really excited to see that dojo.create has made it in! :)

Now jQuery needs dojo.declare().
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; And Joe Walker will be really excited to see that dojo.create has made it in! :)</p>
<p>Now jQuery needs dojo.declare().<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmurph211</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277911</link>
		<dc:creator>mmurph211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277911</guid>
		<description>Syntax example looks like Mootools</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syntax example looks like Mootools</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WillPeavy</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277910</link>
		<dc:creator>WillPeavy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277910</guid>
		<description>Awesome. I&#039;m upgrading all my dev environments to 1.4 today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. I&#8217;m upgrading all my dev environments to 1.4 today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadmeat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277909</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadmeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277909</guid>
		<description>Ah so it&#039;s been made default only for future PHP and Rails websites. I haven&#039;t tested this yet. I&#039;ve just being going from the details in the linked article.

So basically older PHP and Rails websites will still work after the upgrade, and yet they would have still worked if it was the other way around too.

So jQuery has now inherited a limitation of PHP and Rails as the default. I could understand if there was any technical merit to doing it this way. But I guess it&#039;s just because PHP and Rails are the environments of choice for jQuery developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah so it&#8217;s been made default only for future PHP and Rails websites. I haven&#8217;t tested this yet. I&#8217;ve just being going from the details in the linked article.</p>
<p>So basically older PHP and Rails websites will still work after the upgrade, and yet they would have still worked if it was the other way around too.</p>
<p>So jQuery has now inherited a limitation of PHP and Rails as the default. I could understand if there was any technical merit to doing it this way. But I guess it&#8217;s just because PHP and Rails are the environments of choice for jQuery developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhyone</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277908</link>
		<dc:creator>nhyone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277908</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also already using [] to pass arrays to PHP.

jQuery 1.4 can check if the parameter already has &#039;[]&#039;. If so, it just does not have to emit them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also already using [] to pass arrays to PHP.</p>
<p>jQuery 1.4 can check if the parameter already has &#8216;[]&#8216;. If so, it just does not have to emit them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadmeat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277907</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadmeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277907</guid>
		<description>Sorry I meant:
&lt;code&gt; {&#039;param[]&#039;: [val1, val2] }&lt;/code&gt;
Which from what I remember is what you need to do now. It&#039;s what AJAXing a form used in a PHP page would do now for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I meant:<br />
<code> {'param[]': [val1, val2] }</code><br />
Which from what I remember is what you need to do now. It&#8217;s what AJAXing a form used in a PHP page would do now for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menno</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277906</link>
		<dc:creator>Menno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277906</guid>
		<description>@Deadmeat:
&lt;code&gt;
{ &#039;param[]&#039;: val1, &#039;param[]&#039;: val2}
&lt;/code&gt;
Will just evaluate to
&lt;code&gt;
{&#039;param[]&#039;: val2}
&lt;/code&gt;
so that&#039;s not an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deadmeat:<br />
<code><br />
{ 'param[]': val1, 'param[]': val2}<br />
</code><br />
Will just evaluate to<br />
<code><br />
{'param[]': val2}<br />
</code><br />
so that&#8217;s not an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadmeat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-1-4-is-released/comment-page-1#comment-277893</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadmeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=8451#comment-277893</guid>
		<description>Addition to above, the new features look cool, and the performance improvements are impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addition to above, the new features look cool, and the performance improvements are impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

