<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery 1.1.4: Faster, More Tests, Ready for 1.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krijn Hoetmer</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254709</link>
		<dc:creator>Krijn Hoetmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254709</guid>
		<description>Don: wow, base2.DOM is the fastest one in IE7, Opera 9.2, Firefox 1.5 and Safari 3 here :&#124;

Mister Edwards: let all the libraries accidentally steal your code please.. Or am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don: wow, base2.DOM is the fastest one in IE7, Opera 9.2, Firefox 1.5 and Safari 3 here :|</p>
<p>Mister Edwards: let all the libraries accidentally steal your code please.. Or am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254525</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254525</guid>
		<description>http://experiment.bcse.info/slickspeed/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://experiment.bcse.info/slickspeed/" rel="nofollow">http://experiment.bcse.info/slickspeed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254473</guid>
		<description>@John Resig:
Out of curiosity, are there optimizations for the case of getting just 1 element, such as: $(&quot;div.blue:eq(0)&quot;)? Or will jQuery get all $(&quot;div.blue&quot;) first and then pop the first element?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John Resig:<br />
Out of curiosity, are there optimizations for the case of getting just 1 element, such as: $(&#8220;div.blue:eq(0)&#8221;)? Or will jQuery get all $(&#8220;div.blue&#8221;) first and then pop the first element?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Resig</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254470</link>
		<dc:creator>John Resig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254470</guid>
		<description>@Jordan: We can&#039;t :-) Right now $(&quot;#id&quot;) is only about 10% slower than $(document.getElementById(&#039;id&#039;)). And we really can&#039;t get any faster than that (as we have to do a RegExp to verify the selector&#039;s contents). I consider 10% to be a reasonable amount of overhead over pure DOM scripting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jordan: We can&#8217;t :-) Right now $(&#8220;#id&#8221;) is only about 10% slower than $(document.getElementById(&#8216;id&#8217;)). And we really can&#8217;t get any faster than that (as we have to do a RegExp to verify the selector&#8217;s contents). I consider 10% to be a reasonable amount of overhead over pure DOM scripting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254466</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We took the opportunity to step beyond any previously-released speed test suites and improve the speed of the three most commonly used portions of jQuery: ID selectors, tag name selectors, and each() loops:
$(â€#idâ€) : 1676% faster
$(â€elemâ€) : 295% faster
.each() : 554% faster
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Damn $(&quot;#id&quot;) is 10 times faster?! How could you get any faster than document.getElementById?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We took the opportunity to step beyond any previously-released speed test suites and improve the speed of the three most commonly used portions of jQuery: ID selectors, tag name selectors, and each() loops:<br />
$(â€#idâ€) : 1676% faster<br />
$(â€elemâ€) : 295% faster<br />
.each() : 554% faster
</p></blockquote>
<p>Damn $(&#8220;#id&#8221;) is 10 times faster?! How could you get any faster than document.getElementById?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254464</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254464</guid>
		<description>@carmen: :has() [not .has()] must be inside the $(), as seen below.

Together with the deep extend &amp; noConflict, we can finally allow the ever popular:
&lt;code&gt;
/* jQuery lolcatz plugin 0.2b */
(function($) {
	$.cheez = { taste: &quot;delicious&quot; };
	$.extend(true, $, { cheez: { burger: &quot;span&quot; } } );
	$$ = jQuery.noConflict(true);
})(jQuery);

$$( function() {
	if ( $$(&#039;i.can:has(&#039; + $$.cheez.burger+&#039;)&#039; ) ) alert($$.cheez.taste);
});
})(jQuery);

&lt;/code&gt;
Previously efforts to extend cheez on to burgers was destroying taste.
This plugin, soon to be released, allows guaranteed, no-conflict, cheezburger delivery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@carmen: :has() [not .has()] must be inside the $(), as seen below.</p>
<p>Together with the deep extend &amp; noConflict, we can finally allow the ever popular:<br />
<code><br />
/* jQuery lolcatz plugin 0.2b */<br />
(function($) {<br />
	$.cheez = { taste: "delicious" };<br />
	$.extend(true, $, { cheez: { burger: "span" } } );<br />
	$$ = jQuery.noConflict(true);<br />
})(jQuery);</p>
<p>$$( function() {<br />
	if ( $$('i.can:has(' + $$.cheez.burger+')' ) ) alert($$.cheez.taste);<br />
});<br />
})(jQuery);</p>
<p></code><br />
Previously efforts to extend cheez on to burgers was destroying taste.<br />
This plugin, soon to be released, allows guaranteed, no-conflict, cheezburger delivery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmen</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254453</link>
		<dc:creator>carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254453</guid>
		<description>$.fn.can = function() {return self}

now, we can work in style

$(&#039;div&#039;).can.has(&#039;p&#039;)

i&#039;ve always wanted to be able to do that. thank you jQuery!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$.fn.can = function() {return self}</p>
<p>now, we can work in style</p>
<p>$(&#8216;div&#8217;).can.has(&#8216;p&#8217;)</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve always wanted to be able to do that. thank you jQuery!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254450</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254450</guid>
		<description>I love it when things I like get even faster!  Mmm speed increase.

@Rizqi:
In the event that jQuery is written into say, Firefox extensions, or if jQuery is loaded with GreaseMonkey, and then you visit a webpage ALSO using jQuery, the namespace prevents collision.  You could also run two versions of jQuery, i.e. a stable version and a beta, for testing on the same html/js without making two separate pages.  Or if jQuery is written into a Widget, and that widget placed inside a page which uses jQuery.... The list goes on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when things I like get even faster!  Mmm speed increase.</p>
<p>@Rizqi:<br />
In the event that jQuery is written into say, Firefox extensions, or if jQuery is loaded with GreaseMonkey, and then you visit a webpage ALSO using jQuery, the namespace prevents collision.  You could also run two versions of jQuery, i.e. a stable version and a beta, for testing on the same html/js without making two separate pages.  Or if jQuery is written into a Widget, and that widget placed inside a page which uses jQuery&#8230;. The list goes on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Resig</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254449</link>
		<dc:creator>John Resig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254449</guid>
		<description>@Rizqi: There&#039;s no benefit, if you have complete control over a site. But if you work in a situation where you have no control over what else is in the site (which can frequently be the case in large corporations), you can now feel safe knowing that your copy of jQuery will still work.

Additionally, it&#039;s good because you can now inject jQuery into any web site, and it&#039;ll still work. (Some people have written Firefox extensions to inject jQuery into random web pages - so this will help them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rizqi: There&#8217;s no benefit, if you have complete control over a site. But if you work in a situation where you have no control over what else is in the site (which can frequently be the case in large corporations), you can now feel safe knowing that your copy of jQuery will still work.</p>
<p>Additionally, it&#8217;s good because you can now inject jQuery into any web site, and it&#8217;ll still work. (Some people have written Firefox extensions to inject jQuery into random web pages &#8211; so this will help them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silent</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254448</link>
		<dc:creator>silent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254448</guid>
		<description>@rizqi: i guest it&#039;s just possibility taken from this release :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rizqi: i guest it&#8217;s just possibility taken from this release :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizqi Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254447</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizqi Ahmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254447</guid>
		<description>What is the benefit of using mutiple versions of jquery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the benefit of using mutiple versions of jquery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Kelly</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254444</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254444</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I was totally unclear...

I was referring to the ability to embed jQuery into the namespaces of other objects and include multiple versions of jQuery on the same page.

Cheers,
Tara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I was totally unclear&#8230;</p>
<p>I was referring to the ability to embed jQuery into the namespaces of other objects and include multiple versions of jQuery on the same page.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Tara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Kelly</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/comment-page-1#comment-254443</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2701#comment-254443</guid>
		<description>We had had to do a workaround in our auto-login tool in order to compensate for this, so this was indeed a great fix and a time saver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had had to do a workaround in our auto-login tool in order to compensate for this, so this was indeed a great fix and a time saver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

