Comments on: JStORM: A New JavaScript Object-Relational Mapper http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: thynctank http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper/comment-page-1#comment-268951 thynctank Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:09:14 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=4645#comment-268951 @ThomasHansen Some of these libraries don't deal with server databases at all (JazzRecord being one of them). Instead, they are being built for use as value add-ons for caching web apps using Gears/similar technology, or, perhaps more importantly, as facilitators for clean database code in desktop JavaScript platforms like Adobe AIR. @ThomasHansen

Some of these libraries don’t deal with server databases at all (JazzRecord being one of them). Instead, they are being built for use as value add-ons for caching web apps using Gears/similar technology, or, perhaps more importantly, as facilitators for clean database code in desktop JavaScript platforms like Adobe AIR.

]]> By: thynctank http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper/comment-page-1#comment-268950 thynctank Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:06:08 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=4645#comment-268950 Just wanted to mention our newish library JazzRecord (http://www.jazzrecord.org) in case anyone was interested in a JavaScript ActiveRecord clone in specific. I find the syntax to be more concise than Morphine or JStORM, though JStORM seems somewhat similar in terms of usage. Jazz is built on MooTools, and requires the inclusion of the base library to work. Just wanted to mention our newish library JazzRecord (http://www.jazzrecord.org) in case anyone was interested in a JavaScript ActiveRecord clone in specific.

I find the syntax to be more concise than Morphine or JStORM, though JStORM seems somewhat similar in terms of usage.

Jazz is built on MooTools, and requires the inclusion of the base library to work.

]]> By: ThomasHansen http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper/comment-page-1#comment-267811 ThomasHansen Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:35:49 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=4645#comment-267811 @ragjunk db4o is first of all also a product for .Net and Mono, second of all (and more importantly) it is not an ORM tool but an OO database which is quite a difference ... ;) I don't work for them either BTW... @ragjunk
db4o is first of all also a product for .Net and Mono, second of all (and more importantly) it is not an ORM tool but an OO database which is quite a difference … ;)
I don’t work for them either BTW…

]]> By: ragjunk http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper/comment-page-1#comment-267807 ragjunk Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:28:14 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=4645#comment-267807 Of all types of ORM products, I liked db4o the best for its simplicity. It is a Java-based product, but I am siting it as an example for its simple syntax and usage. http://developer.db4o.com/Resources/view.aspx/Formula_One_Tutorial Most ORM products are too intrusive or want us to learn new syntaxes, so they are not easily replaceable. Cheers, Rags. PS: I don't work for db4o, nor have any other interest in db4o. Of all types of ORM products, I liked db4o the best for its simplicity. It is a Java-based product, but I am siting it as an example for its simple syntax and usage.

http://developer.db4o.com/Resources/view.aspx/Formula_One_Tutorial

Most ORM products are too intrusive or want us to learn new syntaxes, so they are not easily replaceable.

Cheers,
Rags.

PS: I don’t work for db4o, nor have any other interest in db4o.

]]> By: morphine http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper/comment-page-1#comment-267802 morphine Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:56:59 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=4645#comment-267802 Hello, I just signal a similar project (syntax a little shorter) : http://morphinedb.googlecode.com/ Hello, I just signal a similar project (syntax a little shorter) :
http://morphinedb.googlecode.com/

]]> By: ThomasHansen http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper/comment-page-1#comment-267801 ThomasHansen Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:00:15 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=4645#comment-267801 Interesting and probably great work, though I still don't understand why so few understand that moving from n'tier to n*n'tier is a bad thing ... ;) (PS! I am not against Ajax, though I am for server-side binded Ajax libraries) Interesting and probably great work, though I still don’t understand why so few understand that moving from n’tier to n*n’tier is a bad thing … ;)
(PS!
I am not against Ajax, though I am for server-side binded Ajax libraries)

]]> By: Urielka http://ajaxian.com/archives/jstorm-a-new-javascript-object-relational-mapper/comment-page-1#comment-267797 Urielka Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:59:47 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=4645#comment-267797 Yeha,docs are coming in,also i am going to write some wiki pages to explain how to implement providers since many people are interested in this. Yeha,docs are coming in,also i am going to write some wiki pages to explain how to implement providers since many people are interested in this.

]]>