<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laszlo Demonstrates Ajax Runtime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wwwhat&#8217;s new? &#187; Blogbox - AÃ±ade en tu blog aplicaciones hechas con laszlo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-69202</link>
		<dc:creator>Wwwhat&#8217;s new? &#187; Blogbox - AÃ±ade en tu blog aplicaciones hechas con laszlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-69202</guid>
		<description>[...] - La misma aplicaciÃ³n en ajax y flash hechas con laszlo. - Demos del site oficial opensource de laszlo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; La misma aplicaciÃ³n en ajax y flash hechas con laszlo. &#8211; Demos del site oficial opensource de laszlo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispaLibertas &#187; Blogbox - AÃ±ade en tu blog aplicaciones hechas con laszlo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-7690</link>
		<dc:creator>HispaLibertas &#187; Blogbox - AÃ±ade en tu blog aplicaciones hechas con laszlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-7690</guid>
		<description>[...] - La misma aplicaciÃ³n en ajax y flash hechas con laszlo. - Demos del site oficial opensource de laszlo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; La misma aplicaciÃ³n en ajax y flash hechas con laszlo. &#8211; Demos del site oficial opensource de laszlo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jouravlev</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jouravlev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>Impressive! Flash version is much sleeker, DHTML version has serious issues with dragging to lower &quot;container&quot; box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive! Flash version is much sleeker, DHTML version has serious issues with dragging to lower &#8220;container&#8221; box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonzalo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonzalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 06:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-4407</guid>
		<description>Well, Lon, I wasn&#039;t trying to imply that Fx is better or worse than IE. That was just my experience. I opened the demo on both browsers and, sorry but IE had far more problems executing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Lon, I wasn&#8217;t trying to imply that Fx is better or worse than IE. That was just my experience. I opened the demo on both browsers and, sorry but IE had far more problems executing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon G</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>&quot;Not really on option for everyday use ...&quot;

What on earth are you talking about? I&#039;d be more than happy to use that everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not really on option for everyday use &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What on earth are you talking about? I&#8217;d be more than happy to use that everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lon</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>IE actually is faster at doing stuff like this. IE&#039;s rendering engine, believe it or not, is a lot faster. Laszlo just concentrated on FF, which is their good right to do.

The page takes over 800KB to load! Almost half of that for JavaScript!
Not really an option for everyday use...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE actually is faster at doing stuff like this. IE&#8217;s rendering engine, believe it or not, is a lot faster. Laszlo just concentrated on FF, which is their good right to do.</p>
<p>The page takes over 800KB to load! Almost half of that for JavaScript!<br />
Not really an option for everyday use&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gonzalo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-4378</link>
		<dc:creator>gonzalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-4378</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really impressive how close they actually get both versions. And they don&#039;t do it by refraining from doing cool stuff, mind you. It&#039;s a nice demo.


Trying this on IE it is quite slower than Firefox and has a couple of glitches which Fx does not. I&#039;ve read the disclaimer about browsers other than Fx, I&#039;m just commenting that it does work on IE but it&#039;s slower. But, anyway, that&#039;s probably the beauty of it, isn&#039;t it? That you can route IE visitors to the Flash version and not miss anything for visitors without Flash (e.g. Firefox x64).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really impressive how close they actually get both versions. And they don&#8217;t do it by refraining from doing cool stuff, mind you. It&#8217;s a nice demo.</p>
<p>Trying this on IE it is quite slower than Firefox and has a couple of glitches which Fx does not. I&#8217;ve read the disclaimer about browsers other than Fx, I&#8217;m just commenting that it does work on IE but it&#8217;s slower. But, anyway, that&#8217;s probably the beauty of it, isn&#8217;t it? That you can route IE visitors to the Flash version and not miss anything for visitors without Flash (e.g. Firefox x64).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew wooldridge</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/laszlo-demonstrates-ajax-runtime/comment-page-1#comment-4370</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew wooldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=961#comment-4370</guid>
		<description>This is great news! Cant wait to see a downloadable build with this in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news! Cant wait to see a downloadable build with this in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

