<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LLVM and running C as well as Python in the browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:30:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matanlurey</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-265774</link>
		<dc:creator>matanlurey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3827#comment-265774</guid>
		<description>I am waiting for the point where you really can use native java (instead of javascript) in the browser - not in the form of GWT and not in the form of Applets - but a replacement for javascript. Then you could use java, scala, jruby, jython, groovy, or any other jvm language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am waiting for the point where you really can use native java (instead of javascript) in the browser &#8211; not in the form of GWT and not in the form of Applets &#8211; but a replacement for javascript. Then you could use java, scala, jruby, jython, groovy, or any other jvm language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajaxester</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-265756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajaxester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3827#comment-265756</guid>
		<description>grrrr8 post. 
i realy like it... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grrrr8 post.<br />
i realy like it&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosredna</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-265708</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosredna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3827#comment-265708</guid>
		<description>I keep saying it, but I don&#039;t think Silverlight can even try to be a player until there are free development environments for it.
.
Microsoft says it&#039;ll eventually work in VS Express, but the last time I checked it&#039;s only in Visual Studio proper. Which I&#039;m sure seems fine if you work INSIDE Microsoft&#039;s walls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep saying it, but I don&#8217;t think Silverlight can even try to be a player until there are free development environments for it.<br />
.<br />
Microsoft says it&#8217;ll eventually work in VS Express, but the last time I checked it&#8217;s only in Visual Studio proper. Which I&#8217;m sure seems fine if you work INSIDE Microsoft&#8217;s walls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadedecho</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-265707</link>
		<dc:creator>shadedecho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3827#comment-265707</guid>
		<description>i think there&#039;s a lot of great potential here... Adobe doesn&#039;t have to spread its arms open wide to all the .NET languages... but allowing better programming and cross-compilation from well respected languages like C and C++ is an excellent start, especially since the near-native performance seems to be acceptable (if quake is playable!). And I&#039;m sure more cross-compiler options will follow for other languages, just like the .NET intermediate runtime language spread.
.
And the point is definitely well made (IMHO) that Flash is at 99% and silverlight won&#039;t be there for a *long* time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think there&#8217;s a lot of great potential here&#8230; Adobe doesn&#8217;t have to spread its arms open wide to all the .NET languages&#8230; but allowing better programming and cross-compilation from well respected languages like C and C++ is an excellent start, especially since the near-native performance seems to be acceptable (if quake is playable!). And I&#8217;m sure more cross-compiler options will follow for other languages, just like the .NET intermediate runtime language spread.<br />
.<br />
And the point is definitely well made (IMHO) that Flash is at 99% and silverlight won&#8217;t be there for a *long* time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosredna</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-265706</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosredna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3827#comment-265706</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but almost everyone has Flash. I can&#039;t imagine Silverlight getting that kind of installed base even in the next 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but almost everyone has Flash. I can&#8217;t imagine Silverlight getting that kind of installed base even in the next 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BertrandLeRoy</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-265704</link>
		<dc:creator>BertrandLeRoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3827#comment-265704</guid>
		<description>If that ever gets out of Flash it could become interesting but otherwise, Silverlight already runs a variety of languages, including Python and Ruby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that ever gets out of Flash it could become interesting but otherwise, Silverlight already runs a variety of languages, including Python and Ruby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosredna</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/llvm-and-running-c-as-well-as-python-in-the-browser/comment-page-1#comment-265700</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosredna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3827#comment-265700</guid>
		<description>Wow.
.
It doesn&#039;t really work for the browser though, does it? Unless all browsers end up supporting the same tokenized files. And if they do, that&#039;s pretty much the end of the open web.
.
This seems more like a technology that stays in Flash forever than something likely to enter the browser world.
.
Really cool, though. It opens up a ton of possibilities for Flash and AIR apps. Like all those nifty emulated HP calculators that I&#039;d been thinking of porting to Flash and JavaScript after I got rich.
.
And MAME, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.<br />
.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t really work for the browser though, does it? Unless all browsers end up supporting the same tokenized files. And if they do, that&#8217;s pretty much the end of the open web.<br />
.<br />
This seems more like a technology that stays in Flash forever than something likely to enter the browser world.<br />
.<br />
Really cool, though. It opens up a ton of possibilities for Flash and AIR apps. Like all those nifty emulated HP calculators that I&#8217;d been thinking of porting to Flash and JavaScript after I got rich.<br />
.<br />
And MAME, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
