Comments on: Mad Mimi: WYSIWYG Email Marketing

By: bazza42

bazza42 — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:22:26 +0000

It appears the proof is in the pudding mad mimi client base is growing which appears to be satisfing their specific clients needs.

There is another new player in the email marketing arena “InteCom” from New Zealand with the application developed on Ruby on Rails -be interested in your thoughts. http://www.intecom.co.nz

By: Garylevitt

Garylevitt — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:04:03 +0000

Domain Keys seem to only be adopted by Yahoo and very recently, by Gmail. It does not effect an IP that has a clear score.

Our anti-spam techniques include human intervention in spammy campaigns. AOL, MSN and Yahoo feedback loops are used to detect spammers as well.

We’re also looking into cleaning up the headers. Thanks for your feedback.

By: SyntacticSugar

SyntacticSugar — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:31:07 +0000

Hmmm. Well the UI may be nice but they’ve got a lot to learn about email marketing.

No authentication (DomainKeys/DKIM). They also fail FCrDNS because they use you name and address as the form: header. I suspect that it will not take long before spammers ruin their IPs reputation as well.

By: Garylevitt

Garylevitt — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:35:29 +0000

Firstly Google Pages is utterly awful. It’s ugly and half the time you can’t figure out what’s going on. It’s good if you want to make websites that give you a headache. It could have been dome 10 times better with Flash.

In terms of Constant Contact’s editor being better, although it does more, that’s not the point of Mad Mimi. Mad Mimi is about simplicity and is built for the web. Not as a desktop product. Constant Contact (and most editors) are overkill. That’s not what we’re about.

Also, we’re redeploying the fix for the IE6 errors in a short while.

By: locdev

locdev — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:40:40 +0000

dear gjl32
Sure I logged in and there are tons of js errors on compose message page. I use IE 6 may be there are no in 7th version or FF but anyway I think that ConstantContact has the simmilar editor with better functionality.

By: GlenLipka

GlenLipka — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:40:03 +0000

I just did a deeper dive. Although it is a web 2.0 graphic design (curved corners, bright pastel colors) I didn’t get the feeling that it was pushing the envelope in terms of UI. It reminded me a little of Google Page Creator but not nearly as easy. http://pages.google.com/

The thing I really didn’t like is the Wiki style formatting. WYSIWYG is much more pleasant for a marketer.

Just my two cents.

By: StephanB

StephanB — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:27:23 +0000

Offtopic:

Am I the only one who thinks that “Lucida Grande” looks crappy? (http://img371.imageshack.us/img371/417/madmimisimplelovelyemaifi6.png)

Why not just use “Helvetica”?

By: gjl32

gjl32 — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:08:55 +0000

Mad Mimi is very different to other email marketing services. You probably haven’t logged in, or used email marketing before. The UI features are really the point here, like sentientholon said.

By: Schill

Schill — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:38:55 +0000

As a side note/rant, I would love for all email clients to only render plaintext. Image-based email (including web beacons etc.), is more annoying/evil than useful/good in my opinion, spam just highlights this issue.

By: sentientholon

sentientholon — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:57:30 +0000

It’s on Ajaxian because of its unique UI features, not because there’s nowhere else you can go to send marketing emails.

By: locdev

locdev — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:47:40 +0000

ha ha one more email marketing service.
doesn’t look different. not sure why AJAXIN selected it as something unique.