<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Narwhal: Standard Library that implements ServerJS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/narwhal-standard-library-that-implements-serverjs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/narwhal-standard-library-that-implements-serverjs</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gizmogwai</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/narwhal-standard-library-that-implements-serverjs/comment-page-1#comment-273714</link>
		<dc:creator>gizmogwai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=6863#comment-273714</guid>
		<description>Hum, does anyone know how well (or bad) it behaves compare to ejscript?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum, does anyone know how well (or bad) it behaves compare to ejscript?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlrobinson</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/narwhal-standard-library-that-implements-serverjs/comment-page-1#comment-273688</link>
		<dc:creator>tlrobinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=6863#comment-273688</guid>
		<description>Smith: Correct, sort of. Narwhal is the actual implementation of the ServerJS standard.

Jack, Chiron, Nitro, getjs are just a few of hopefully many ServerJS / Narwhal compatible packages.

It&#039;s still a work in progress (particularly since the ServerJS standard is still a work in progress) but it&#039;s at a point where you can start playing around with it (and contributing!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smith: Correct, sort of. Narwhal is the actual implementation of the ServerJS standard.</p>
<p>Jack, Chiron, Nitro, getjs are just a few of hopefully many ServerJS / Narwhal compatible packages.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a work in progress (particularly since the ServerJS standard is still a work in progress) but it&#8217;s at a point where you can start playing around with it (and contributing!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hlindqvi</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/narwhal-standard-library-that-implements-serverjs/comment-page-1#comment-273687</link>
		<dc:creator>hlindqvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=6863#comment-273687</guid>
		<description>The first production ready server side JavaScript Apache-module/FastCGI will probably set the standard, until then just hope they make it good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first production ready server side JavaScript Apache-module/FastCGI will probably set the standard, until then just hope they make it good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westonruter</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/narwhal-standard-library-that-implements-serverjs/comment-page-1#comment-273685</link>
		<dc:creator>westonruter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=6863#comment-273685</guid>
		<description>The &quot;ServerJS standard&quot;? Isn&#039;t it a bit too early to call it a standard? It seems like it&#039;s status is the same as HTML5...  holding great promise, but still a draft. From what I have seen, it still is only at a starting point: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ServerJS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;ServerJS standard&#8221;? Isn&#8217;t it a bit too early to call it a standard? It seems like it&#8217;s status is the same as HTML5&#8230;  holding great promise, but still a draft. From what I have seen, it still is only at a starting point: <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/ServerJS" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/ServerJS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smith</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/narwhal-standard-library-that-implements-serverjs/comment-page-1#comment-273684</link>
		<dc:creator>smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=6863#comment-273684</guid>
		<description>I think the above description may be a little misleading, though it&#039;s confusing at best. 

The projects mentioned above are Narwhal *packages*, which use Narwhal for its standard library and module functionality. If I&#039;m not mistaken, Narwhal itself is also a package. So all of these projects depend on Narwhal, they don&#039;t make it up.

Either way, all of them are awesome, great job everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the above description may be a little misleading, though it&#8217;s confusing at best. </p>
<p>The projects mentioned above are Narwhal *packages*, which use Narwhal for its standard library and module functionality. If I&#8217;m not mistaken, Narwhal itself is also a package. So all of these projects depend on Narwhal, they don&#8217;t make it up.</p>
<p>Either way, all of them are awesome, great job everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

