Comments on: Old Navy Up to Some New Tricks

By: links13

links13 — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:22:14 +0000

links of london links of london sale sweetie bracelet links of london sweetie bracelet links of london Bracelets links of london charm tiffany jewellery tiffany co tiffany uk abercrombie and fitch

By: Ajaxpert

Ajaxpert — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:47:03 +0000

Here is good tutorial for AJAX

http://gohil.dharmesh.googlepages.com/ajax.html

By: Mia

Mia — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:28:17 +0000

Y’all have way too much time on your hands . . .

By: Nate

Nate — Mon, 14 May 2007 22:55:23 +0000

I’d like to code something similar. Anyone have a tutorial on how this is actually coded?

By: The Ecommerce Blog » Using Ajax with a Business Website

The Ecommerce Blog » Using Ajax with a Business Website — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:38:04 +0000

[...] Product and Image Rollovers: When a user places their mouse over, or clicks on an object, Ajax can deliver a clean rollover with extra information or a larger product image. Old Navy has already implemented this on their website. I also just noticed yesterday that eBay is using Ajax rollovers for some of images when browsing through auction listings (Look for images with an ‘enlarge’ and an hourglass icon under an image. Once you place your mouse over it, the image enlarges). Amazon has been using an Ajax rollover in the upper tab of the navigation bar for more than a year now. Google is probably the king of using a lot of Ajax on many Google services. [...]

By: Eric

Eric — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:11:34 +0000

Safari certainly seems to work with this function to me. Not sure if they updated the code, or whether Safari has been updated to work with such code. Good thing, Old Navy is a merchant I advertise on my site and wouldn’t want them to be unfriendly to macaholics such as myself.

By: partypoker

partypoker — Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:29:05 +0000

By: Ajaxian »

Ajaxian » — Wed, 10 May 2006 11:01:34 +0000

[...] Old Navy Up to Some New Tricks [...]

By: Nishant PIthia

Nishant PIthia — Tue, 09 May 2006 14:34:32 +0000

Hi, Nice site with good functionality. Iliked the prompt idea of related products. I think it works better than list of related products listed there as it stimulates your mind like real salesmen selling in shop!! (Its like do you want a bang with laptop which is on special offer0 ;o)

Anywhere we can customisable scripts?

Nishant Pithia

By: dkappe

dkappe — Mon, 08 May 2006 20:13:32 +0000

No real XHR requests going on? Sounds like you're too much of a stickler for the literal interpretation of AJAX. It's not surprising, though, to see e-commerce businesses adopting AJAX and related technologies. Their credibility depends on it.

By: krazykarl

krazykarl — Mon, 08 May 2006 17:17:35 +0000

“Thats 6-12% of their market gone just like that.”

again, what world do you live in….

By: Dave Ashe

Dave Ashe — Mon, 08 May 2006 11:00:20 +0000

YAWN

By: antzania

antzania — Sun, 07 May 2006 10:40:19 +0000

[...] Navy Up to Some New Tricks Incoming Links (via Tecnorati):Nothing Reported No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments onthis post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:

[...]

By: chad chad — Sun, 07 May 2006 09:10:34 +0000 Let’s just not that there are no xml request for this page on Old Navy, so they really just load all of the info on initial load and display it via javascript. Nice to see, not realy any ajax/xml requests going on :) By: David David — Sun, 07 May 2006 08:19:12 +0000 There is some new stat out i saw on a blog, all this web 2.0 is taxing bandwidth and server cpu usage to the point where developers are questioning its longevity. I must wait till I’m back at the office and look through my email. The new Old navy site seems slower.
By: Josh

Josh — Sat, 06 May 2006 16:41:36 +0000

Wesley: Safari users are 6-12%? How do you figure? The most recent stats from TheCounter.com (probably the most diverse broad set available to the public–i.e., they do not favor one specific subset of users) have Safari at 2%. 6-12% is just a dream.

http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/May/browser.php

By: Hakan Bilgin

Hakan Bilgin — Sat, 06 May 2006 16:08:01 +0000

zzzzzZZZZZ…..zzzzzzz……zzzzzzZZZZ

To boring post…even more boring site…

By: Alan Wallace

Alan Wallace — Sat, 06 May 2006 10:55:40 +0000

It’s nice and all but you get nothing without javascript enabled. I thought we were moving beyond the all or nothing approach, surely the site could have degraded to provide a stripped down version for non -js users? I really think that while they should be praised for providing a nice touch it should be highlighted that there are better ways of doing it.

By: Wesley Walser

Wesley Walser — Sat, 06 May 2006 07:07:30 +0000

“This is a prime example of using Ajax and Web 2.0 methods and technologies to enhance an experience people are already use to – shopping online.”

It’s also a prime example of technology released before it should have been. They locked out safari users for months when the new site was released, and I don’t think they have fixed the problem. Thats 6-12% of their market gone just like that. If you don’t really that 10% of people don’t get to hear your message, you don’t care enough about your message.

By: Joe P

Joe P — Sat, 06 May 2006 05:48:18 +0000

When Gap first put this on their site, they did a “beta” test by simply only showing the changes to people who got to the site by typing in “gap.com”. Anyone using the “www.gap.com” subdomain got the normal site. I wonder what percentage of users don’t go to the “www.” version? Must have been small enough for them to want to test it that way, but large enough to get a feel for site performance as well as user experience.