http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-04-composability-interop-ubiquity-and-the-client Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-04-composability-interop-ubiquity-and-the-client/comment-page-1#comment-266363 Nosredna Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:11:02 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=3993#comment-266363 Sure. It's general enough it can mean almost anything. Sure. It’s general enough it can mean almost anything.

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-04-composability-interop-ubiquity-and-the-client/comment-page-1#comment-266360 polterguy Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:49:35 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=3993#comment-266360 Great list, of course way too general for average Joe to be able to understand what it actually says, but for a list like this to exist more than 5 years I think it should be extremely general. The bright ones among us can always explain what it means to the rest I assume ;) Great list, of course way too general for average Joe to be able to understand what it actually says, but for a list like this to exist more than 5 years I think it should be extremely general. The bright ones among us can always explain what it means to the rest I assume ;)

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-04-composability-interop-ubiquity-and-the-client/comment-page-1#comment-266347 Nosredna Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:01:48 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=3993#comment-266347 >>Hurray censorship! . Wut? >>Hurray censorship!
.
Wut?

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-04-composability-interop-ubiquity-and-the-client/comment-page-1#comment-266345 restlessdesign Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:18:35 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=3993#comment-266345 Hurray censorship! Hurray censorship!

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-04-composability-interop-ubiquity-and-the-client/comment-page-1#comment-266332 Nosredna Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:31:50 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=3993#comment-266332 That's all pretty abstract, and I think the abstractions are just a best-fit around the issues web developers argue about. . To me, the actual arguments are much more interesting than any abstractions that fall out. . Issues like: . 1) If JavaScript was allowed by browsers to be supplied in a tokenized state (minus the source), is the Open Web effectively gone? . 2) Are Flash and Silverlight keeping browsers from going where they should go (example: native Canvas support for IE)? . 3) Is machine-generated code (from compilers for Java, Ruy, HAXE, etc.) a danger to the Open web because the code is inscrutable? That’s all pretty abstract, and I think the abstractions are just a best-fit around the issues web developers argue about.
.
To me, the actual arguments are much more interesting than any abstractions that fall out.
.
Issues like:
.
1) If JavaScript was allowed by browsers to be supplied in a tokenized state (minus the source), is the Open Web effectively gone?
.
2) Are Flash and Silverlight keeping browsers from going where they should go (example: native Canvas support for IE)?
.
3) Is machine-generated code (from compilers for Java, Ruy, HAXE, etc.) a danger to the Open web because the code is inscrutable?

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-04-composability-interop-ubiquity-and-the-client/comment-page-1#comment-266331 SiteSmart Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:49:10 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/?p=3993#comment-266331 It's interesting that developer's are working hard to make the web more open while governments and corporations aew working just as hard to close it up. Then there is browser support...sigh...will we ever really have the Open Web? It’s interesting that developer’s are working hard to make the web more open while governments and corporations aew working just as hard to close it up. Then there is browser support…sigh…will we ever really have the Open Web?

]]>