<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenAjax Alliance Launches Its Second Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/openajax-alliance-launches-its-second-wave/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/openajax-alliance-launches-its-second-wave</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nolan</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/openajax-alliance-launches-its-second-wave/comment-page-1#comment-261178</link>
		<dc:creator>nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3304#comment-261178</guid>
		<description>We have implemented something similar at Appcelerator.    We have a simple JS-based widget API that makes it easy to not only create new widgets, but to also wrap existing third-party widgets like those from YUI or ExtJS.  Our widget API allows you to specify metadata (e.g., optional/required widget parameters, name, description, etc.), and this information is used by our Eclipse-based IDE.

We also have a simple publish/subscribe messaging model that handles both local (within the client application) and remote (Ajax) messages (also integrated with our IDE).

Of course, our  implementation is not a standard, but it does attempt to address the some of the problems mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have implemented something similar at Appcelerator.    We have a simple JS-based widget API that makes it easy to not only create new widgets, but to also wrap existing third-party widgets like those from YUI or ExtJS.  Our widget API allows you to specify metadata (e.g., optional/required widget parameters, name, description, etc.), and this information is used by our Eclipse-based IDE.</p>
<p>We also have a simple publish/subscribe messaging model that handles both local (within the client application) and remote (Ajax) messages (also integrated with our IDE).</p>
<p>Of course, our  implementation is not a standard, but it does attempt to address the some of the problems mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenAjax</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/openajax-alliance-launches-its-second-wave/comment-page-1#comment-261173</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenAjax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3304#comment-261173</guid>
		<description>We do need &#039;OpenAjax&#039; - the Alliance has done some great stuff.  The problem is it is to SLOOOOW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do need &#8216;OpenAjax&#8217; &#8211; the Alliance has done some great stuff.  The problem is it is to SLOOOOW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter svensson</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/openajax-alliance-launches-its-second-wave/comment-page-1#comment-261171</link>
		<dc:creator>peter svensson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3304#comment-261171</guid>
		<description>I agree that they&#039;re a silent (and maybe aloof) bunch.

But about the tech; OpenAjax (or something like it) is really important. I especially like the ambition to create a standard Widget format, and for the focus on modularization. All the things done to ensure simplification for IDE&#039;s will also make it easier for anyone to consume and manage services in general. 

Cheers,
PS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they&#8217;re a silent (and maybe aloof) bunch.</p>
<p>But about the tech; OpenAjax (or something like it) is really important. I especially like the ambition to create a standard Widget format, and for the focus on modularization. All the things done to ensure simplification for IDE&#8217;s will also make it easier for anyone to consume and manage services in general. </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
PS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenAjax</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/openajax-alliance-launches-its-second-wave/comment-page-1#comment-261170</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenAjax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3304#comment-261170</guid>
		<description>I posted an article on OpenAjax.Com
&lt;a href=&quot;http://openajax.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OpenAjax Alliance needs to change!&lt;/a&gt;

The biggest problems:
1) Most developers do not even know what &#039;OpenAjax&#039; is
2) There are NO jobs for &quot;openAjax&#039; - Go over to favorite job search and see for yourself (I would suggest Indeed.Com)
3) The alliance still seems to cater to corporations instead of developers as a whole
4) Jon Ferraiolo STILL has NOT followed through with a simple promise when I donated the domain - he does not seem to appreciate the contribution or understand Open Source attribution .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted an article on OpenAjax.Com<br />
<a href="http://openajax.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">OpenAjax Alliance needs to change!</a></p>
<p>The biggest problems:<br />
1) Most developers do not even know what &#8216;OpenAjax&#8217; is<br />
2) There are NO jobs for &#8220;openAjax&#8217; &#8211; Go over to favorite job search and see for yourself (I would suggest Indeed.Com)<br />
3) The alliance still seems to cater to corporations instead of developers as a whole<br />
4) Jon Ferraiolo STILL has NOT followed through with a simple promise when I donated the domain &#8211; he does not seem to appreciate the contribution or understand Open Source attribution .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tj111</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/openajax-alliance-launches-its-second-wave/comment-page-1#comment-261165</link>
		<dc:creator>tj111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3304#comment-261165</guid>
		<description>Your link is wrong.  Here is the correct url: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openajaxallianc/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link is wrong.  Here is the correct url: <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/openajaxallianc/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/openajaxallianc/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

