<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PassPack and aSSL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:46:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rocks</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/comment-page-1#comment-268518</link>
		<dc:creator>rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1997#comment-268518</guid>
		<description>Does it secure enough?
Daniel, programmer of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.herbalsleeping.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;herbal sleeping pills&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it secure enough?<br />
Daniel, programmer of <a href="http://www.herbalsleeping.com" rel="nofollow">herbal sleeping pills</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/comment-page-1#comment-246621</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1997#comment-246621</guid>
		<description>@Scott
Yes, there has been quite a bit of buzz about XSS via Ajax. Essentially, it boils down to this: a poorly built website will be easily violated, a well built one will not â€“ Ajax is irrelevant, whatâ€™s important is that itâ€™s high quality. I took a look at your site, it seems you&#039;ve already found Whitehat&#039;s article &quot;Myth Busting Ajax Insecurity&quot;
.
This blog post, and subsequent comments, briefly describe PassPack&#039;s security measures (in layman&#039;s terms):
http://passpack.wordpress.com/2006/12/14/password-security-packing-keys/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott<br />
Yes, there has been quite a bit of buzz about XSS via Ajax. Essentially, it boils down to this: a poorly built website will be easily violated, a well built one will not â€“ Ajax is irrelevant, whatâ€™s important is that itâ€™s high quality. I took a look at your site, it seems you&#8217;ve already found Whitehat&#8217;s article &#8220;Myth Busting Ajax Insecurity&#8221;<br />
.<br />
This blog post, and subsequent comments, briefly describe PassPack&#8217;s security measures (in layman&#8217;s terms):<br />
<a href="http://passpack.wordpress.com/2006/12/14/password-security-packing-keys/" rel="nofollow">http://passpack.wordpress.com/2006/12/14/password-security-packing-keys/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wright</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/comment-page-1#comment-246564</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1997#comment-246564</guid>
		<description>Hi folks.  I&#039;m brand new to AJAX, and I&#039;m not a developer... so why am I here?  Well, I do IT Security consulting. It&#039;s a huge field that you can&#039;t possibly know everything about unless you&#039;re Bruce Schneier (just kidding).  While I haven&#039;t done development myself in many years, I do a lot of architectural analysis in the name of security.  I only recently heard the term AJAX.  How far behind the curve does that make me?  I&#039;ve heard via CNET podcasts that AJAX has some serious cross-site scripting type vulnerabilities. 

So, I have two comments.  I&#039;d be interested in finding some background articles on the essentials of AJAX that a security architect would need to know.  I&#039;d also like to hear some comments in reply to the vulnerability issues.

Thanks, and while i&#039;m pretty new to posting on blogs, feel free to drop by my blog at http://www.securityviews.com and make some comments to get things rolling.  (BTW - nice capcha technique for comment posting!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks.  I&#8217;m brand new to AJAX, and I&#8217;m not a developer&#8230; so why am I here?  Well, I do IT Security consulting. It&#8217;s a huge field that you can&#8217;t possibly know everything about unless you&#8217;re Bruce Schneier (just kidding).  While I haven&#8217;t done development myself in many years, I do a lot of architectural analysis in the name of security.  I only recently heard the term AJAX.  How far behind the curve does that make me?  I&#8217;ve heard via CNET podcasts that AJAX has some serious cross-site scripting type vulnerabilities. </p>
<p>So, I have two comments.  I&#8217;d be interested in finding some background articles on the essentials of AJAX that a security architect would need to know.  I&#8217;d also like to hear some comments in reply to the vulnerability issues.</p>
<p>Thanks, and while i&#8217;m pretty new to posting on blogs, feel free to drop by my blog at <a href="http://www.securityviews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.securityviews.com</a> and make some comments to get things rolling.  (BTW &#8211; nice capcha technique for comment posting!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Kelly</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/comment-page-1#comment-245939</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1997#comment-245939</guid>
		<description>@dude
You said: &quot;The site is very nice. I really like the user interface&quot;
And I say: &quot;Thanks! Glad you like it.&quot;
What can I do? I still get excited, to this day, when someone likes something I&#039;ve built. :) Much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dude<br />
You said: &#8220;The site is very nice. I really like the user interface&#8221;<br />
And I say: &#8220;Thanks! Glad you like it.&#8221;<br />
What can I do? I still get excited, to this day, when someone likes something I&#8217;ve built. :) Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/comment-page-1#comment-245937</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1997#comment-245937</guid>
		<description>The site is very nice. I really like the user interface, and the security mechanism is interesting. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll use it though - I don&#039;t trust my *REAL* passwords anywhere but in my brain (bank, for instance) . For the passwords I don&#039;t care that much about ... well I don&#039;t really care if I forget them I suppose. There&#039;s always a &#039;forgot pwd&#039; link - if there is no such link chances are the site sucks so bad I probably won&#039;t have an account on it. 
Just a personal opinion on online passwords - wish you the best, the site is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site is very nice. I really like the user interface, and the security mechanism is interesting. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll use it though &#8211; I don&#8217;t trust my *REAL* passwords anywhere but in my brain (bank, for instance) . For the passwords I don&#8217;t care that much about &#8230; well I don&#8217;t really care if I forget them I suppose. There&#8217;s always a &#8216;forgot pwd&#8217; link &#8211; if there is no such link chances are the site sucks so bad I probably won&#8217;t have an account on it.<br />
Just a personal opinion on online passwords &#8211; wish you the best, the site is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco Sullo</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/comment-page-1#comment-245921</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Sullo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1997#comment-245921</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to underline that *PassPack uses standard SSL* and it is totally separated from aSSL. The unique connection between the two projects is that I work on both.

@Jason. Careful, aSSL is not a substitute for SSL, it only &quot;raises the bar&quot; for non-critical sites. aSSL is not currently safe from MiTM attacks. I&#039;m studing a certification mechanism based on a network of public testimonial to (hopefully, someday) overcome this limitation, but it is far from happening. Please read the aSSL Security FAQ: http://assl.sullof.com/assl/securityfaq.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to underline that *PassPack uses standard SSL* and it is totally separated from aSSL. The unique connection between the two projects is that I work on both.</p>
<p>@Jason. Careful, aSSL is not a substitute for SSL, it only &#8220;raises the bar&#8221; for non-critical sites. aSSL is not currently safe from MiTM attacks. I&#8217;m studing a certification mechanism based on a network of public testimonial to (hopefully, someday) overcome this limitation, but it is far from happening. Please read the aSSL Security FAQ: <a href="http://assl.sullof.com/assl/securityfaq.asp" rel="nofollow">http://assl.sullof.com/assl/securityfaq.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kolb</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/passpack-and-assl/comment-page-1#comment-245915</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kolb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1997#comment-245915</guid>
		<description>This is extremely cool, I&#039;ve been waiting for something like this for a long time.  I can&#039;t wait to do away with SSL.  Thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is extremely cool, I&#8217;ve been waiting for something like this for a long time.  I can&#8217;t wait to do away with SSL.  Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
