<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PBwiki JavaScript Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/pbwiki-javascript-testing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/pbwiki-javascript-testing</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: csuwldcat</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/pbwiki-javascript-testing/comment-page-1#comment-260619</link>
		<dc:creator>csuwldcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3216#comment-260619</guid>
		<description>Where is the selector tests and Mootools?  Moo 1.2 quickened IE and we all know Moo stomped Jquer in FF already.  Nice 1-sided test, too bad Jquery&#039;s &quot;15kb&quot; size requires you to grab Jquery UI or Interface (~200kb!!!!!) to even touch the native plugins and classes of Mootools.  Jquers, when will you learn that modifying the js natives is the only way you will ever compete?  Oh and as a parting shot, Jquery&#039;s animation smoothness, regardless of the plugin library used, is chop at best, go get some RP equations for computation...come on count chocula, peter pan, your better than that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the selector tests and Mootools?  Moo 1.2 quickened IE and we all know Moo stomped Jquer in FF already.  Nice 1-sided test, too bad Jquery&#8217;s &#8220;15kb&#8221; size requires you to grab Jquery UI or Interface (~200kb!!!!!) to even touch the native plugins and classes of Mootools.  Jquers, when will you learn that modifying the js natives is the only way you will ever compete?  Oh and as a parting shot, Jquery&#8217;s animation smoothness, regardless of the plugin library used, is chop at best, go get some RP equations for computation&#8230;come on count chocula, peter pan, your better than that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/pbwiki-javascript-testing/comment-page-1#comment-260613</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3216#comment-260613</guid>
		<description>So this just shows the serving time of each framework and the loading time of each browser?  jQuery is smaller than the rest - gzipped at 15kb - so what is this test proving? 

Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this just shows the serving time of each framework and the loading time of each browser?  jQuery is smaller than the rest &#8211; gzipped at 15kb &#8211; so what is this test proving? </p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

