Comments on: Photoshop Online

By: Adobe Photoshop CS3

Adobe Photoshop CS3 — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:42:09 +0000

If you don’t want to wait for the online version, we have Adobe Photoshop CS3 on sale now for only $347.

If you mention this site, we’ll give a 10% rebate back from Paypal after you place your order. http://4-ps.com

By: Internet Dating Support

Internet Dating Support — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:12:09 +0000

wow, that is pretty cool, i want to play with it too.

By: Rabbitpearlvibrator

Rabbitpearlvibrator — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:13:59 +0000

I am a fan of Adobe Photoshop, the powerful image-editing software that graphic designers love. But I find myself using it less often than I used to. In fact, my usage has fallen off dramatically. The main reason is that I find I often don’t need all the firepower it has to offer.
Most of the time, I am just doing some simple cropping and resizing of photos. To use Photoshop, which takes (what feels like) a long time to load, seems like overkill. Besides, I often need to do some image editing while I am away from my main office computer, the only one of my three computers that even has Photoshop on it. And the reason most of my computers don’t have the program is that, at $649, it’s too expensive. Even the much cheaper and less powerful Photoshop Elements, at $99, feels like overkill most of the time.
I have been increasingly relying on free, Web-based photo editors that require no downloads and can be easily accessed just about anywhere in the world. They mostly work the same way: You go to the site, upload the photo you want to edit (or put in the photo’s URL if it’s already online somewhere) and then make the changes to the photo right away on the screen. You can then download the photo or e-mail it. They almost all allow you to crop, resize, adjust brightness and contrast, etc. Regards, Rabbit

By: Peter Lambert

Peter Lambert — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:30:04 +0000

Frankly, I just don’t get it. Elements is meant to be Photoshop “lite”, this proposed online version will be a “lite”, “lite” version?

By: flsj slsh

flsj slsh — Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:16:14 +0000

UM……. and where is the photoshop??????!!!!!!!!!!

By: Rostislav Siryk

Rostislav Siryk — Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:10:14 +0000

I think Adobe makes a big challenge for itself, because if they intend to make fully functional version of Photoshop, they force themselves to have Flash Player which can handle the Layers, Filters, Masks, Huge Images and all stuff which makes original Photoshop so cool and heavyweight application.

So I think next step from Adobe is to upgrade the Flash Player to handle much more expensive calculations and to have overall greater performance, than current one.

So this is very good news for all flash developers!

By: carmen

carmen — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:19:21 +0000

now that things are fast enough to do anything clientside and distributed, adobe/yahoo/microsoft/google are shoving ‘hey , run stuff on our servers’ down our throats

i guess they think people are too dumb to download GIMP? theyre probably right..

or maybe they just yearn for the days of the 486

By: Mike Ritchie

Mike Ritchie — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:06:43 +0000

Can Dreamweaver etc be far behind? I’ve often wondered why the editors have focused pretty much exclusively on the rich-text angle, when I’m pretty sure coders maintaining client sites who switch to the “source code” view in FCKeditor would love to see a similar “widget” that would handle tag insight and tag completion.

By: Andre Charland

Andre Charland — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:13:18 +0000

wow. that’s amazing, can’t wait to play with it:) And MS still doesn’t have word or excel online…kudos to adobe!