http://ajaxian.com/archives/porting-prototype-enumerable-functions-to-mootools-array-objects Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 http://ajaxian.com/archives/porting-prototype-enumerable-functions-to-mootools-array-objects/comment-page-1#comment-245568 Bas Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:27:32 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/porting-prototype-enumerable-functions-to-mootools-array-objects#comment-245568 Yes you're right, but I'd like to keep the code more in the spirit of Mootools. I wrote the code with the intention to add maybe 2 or 3 functions to the Array object, not the whole scala of functions from the Enumerable class. In this way I don't need a new class. Yes you’re right, but I’d like to keep the code more in the spirit of Mootools. I wrote the code with the intention to add maybe 2 or 3 functions to the Array object, not the whole scala of functions from the Enumerable class. In this way I don’t need a new class.

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/porting-prototype-enumerable-functions-to-mootools-array-objects/comment-page-1#comment-245564 Michael Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:03:30 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/porting-prototype-enumerable-functions-to-mootools-array-objects#comment-245564 Bas: Why not just create a new Enumerable Class and then implement it in Array? That way, you can use it with other objects as well... That was the original thinking behind keeping it separate in Prototype in the first place. Bas: Why not just create a new Enumerable Class and then implement it in Array? That way, you can use it with other objects as well… That was the original thinking behind keeping it separate in Prototype in the first place.

]]>