<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S3 Javascript Bindings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theneteffect</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-263870</link>
		<dc:creator>theneteffect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-263870</guid>
		<description>I was looking for something like this but this is a little old but eventually found what I was looking for - SMEStorage.com - these guys are using S3 and the implementation is pretty slick.  They are also talking about letting you use your own S3 Keys:

http://www.thesmespace.com/blog/?p=45</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking for something like this but this is a little old but eventually found what I was looking for &#8211; SMEStorage.com &#8211; these guys are using S3 and the implementation is pretty slick.  They are also talking about letting you use your own S3 Keys:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesmespace.com/blog/?p=45" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesmespace.com/blog/?p=45</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nilesh</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-229099</link>
		<dc:creator>Nilesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-229099</guid>
		<description>I read SH1 is already marked as unsafe to use, SH2 or other SH should be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read SH1 is already marked as unsafe to use, SH2 or other SH should be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajaxian S3 Javascript Bindings - Bindings</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-52622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajaxian S3 Javascript Bindings - Bindings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-52622</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajaxian S3 Javascript BindingsMonday, April 24th, 2006. S3 Javascript Bindings. There s a new open-source project to access Amazon s S3 storage service from Javascript. Creator Les Orchard explains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajaxian S3 Javascript BindingsMonday, April 24th, 2006. S3 Javascript Bindings. There s a new open-source project to access Amazon s S3 storage service from Javascript. Creator Les Orchard explains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where storage goes to play. at EdgeCloud.__init__()</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-11275</link>
		<dc:creator>Where storage goes to play. at EdgeCloud.__init__()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 04:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-11275</guid>
		<description>[...] Amazon&#8217;s S3 storage service has definitely changed the game. Storage and bandwidth seem to drop in price year over year (thanks to the build up and ultimate fall out of the dot-com era) but it has never reached such a level of commiditization. And there are plenty of players there to piggy back of Amazon&#8217;s new creation (heck, there are even Javascript bindings for the darn thing), but you knew it wouldn&#8217;t be long before someone took it to the next level. Enter Jungle Disk. A smart, easy to install, works like a mapped drive no matter where you are at software system piggy backing off the MOSS (massively-online-storage-system) and you have a match made in heaven - and there&#8217;s even a mac client of the software so you can do your drag and drop just like your windows counterparts. This software can have an immediate and direct impact on how you work. If all the marketing speak holds true then this really will be *the* backup and sync solution everyone has hoped for - no more duplicate drives, scheduled backups or RAID systems - just drag and drop and sync - no fuss. There&#8217;s even an encryption layer for those who&#8217;d like the extra privacy. I&#8217;m downloading it now and will provide further information here later on if this utility fits the bill. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amazon&#8217;s S3 storage service has definitely changed the game. Storage and bandwidth seem to drop in price year over year (thanks to the build up and ultimate fall out of the dot-com era) but it has never reached such a level of commiditization. And there are plenty of players there to piggy back of Amazon&#8217;s new creation (heck, there are even Javascript bindings for the darn thing), but you knew it wouldn&#8217;t be long before someone took it to the next level. Enter Jungle Disk. A smart, easy to install, works like a mapped drive no matter where you are at software system piggy backing off the MOSS (massively-online-storage-system) and you have a match made in heaven &#8211; and there&#8217;s even a mac client of the software so you can do your drag and drop just like your windows counterparts. This software can have an immediate and direct impact on how you work. If all the marketing speak holds true then this really will be *the* backup and sync solution everyone has hoped for &#8211; no more duplicate drives, scheduled backups or RAID systems &#8211; just drag and drop and sync &#8211; no fuss. There&#8217;s even an encryption layer for those who&#8217;d like the extra privacy. I&#8217;m downloading it now and will provide further information here later on if this utility fits the bill. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings - Bindings</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-9192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings - Bindings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-9192</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings I just read this article on Ajaxian about the new S3 Javascript Bindings. &#8230; Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings a new open-source project to access Amazon&#8217;s &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings I just read this article on Ajaxian about the new S3 Javascript Bindings. &#8230; Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings a new open-source project to access Amazon&#8217;s &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmonic Bindings - My Blog</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-8809</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmonic Bindings - My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 04:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-8809</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings I just read this article on Ajaxian about the new S3 Javascript Bindings. &#8230; Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings a new open-source project to access Amazon&#8217;s &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings I just read this article on Ajaxian about the new S3 Javascript Bindings. &#8230; Ajaxian &#187; S3 Javascript Bindings a new open-source project to access Amazon&#8217;s &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Werner blogt &#187; links for 2006-04-29</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-8189</link>
		<dc:creator>Werner blogt &#187; links for 2006-04-29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-8189</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajaxian Â» S3 Javascript Bindings a new open-source project to access Amazonâ€™s S3 storage service from Javascript (tags: javascript ajax amazon s3 web2.0 online storage) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajaxian Â» S3 Javascript Bindings a new open-source project to access Amazonâ€™s S3 storage service from Javascript (tags: javascript ajax amazon s3 web2.0 online storage) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7851</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7851</guid>
		<description>arantius:  The link Jeremy mentions there points at my first thinking-out-loud about S3Ajax, FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arantius:  The link Jeremy mentions there points at my first thinking-out-loud about S3Ajax, FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full Speed</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7823</link>
		<dc:creator>Full Speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7823</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Amazon S3 Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

Amazon&#039;s Simple Storage Service (S3 for short) is really hot lately. From the site:&quot;Amazon S3 provides a simple web services interface that can be used to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Amazon S3 Roundup</strong></p>
<p>Amazon&#8217;s Simple Storage Service (S3 for short) is really hot lately. From the site:&#8221;Amazon S3 provides a simple web services interface that can be used to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Barnett blog</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7779</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Barnett blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7779</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Experiments with Amazon S3 Storage&lt;/strong&gt;

Some very cool experimentation going on with Amazon S3 Storage. Just check out filicio.us.
Jeff must...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Experiments with Amazon S3 Storage</strong></p>
<p>Some very cool experimentation going on with Amazon S3 Storage. Just check out filicio.us.<br />
Jeff must&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arantius</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7778</link>
		<dc:creator>arantius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7778</guid>
		<description>Yep, people have thought of storing greasemonkey data in S3 before:

http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/greasemonkey/2006-April/008063.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, people have thought of storing greasemonkey data in S3 before:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/greasemonkey/2006-April/008063.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/greasemonkey/2006-April/008063.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filicio.us blog &#187; Ajaxian: S3 JavaScript binding</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7739</link>
		<dc:creator>filicio.us blog &#187; Ajaxian: S3 JavaScript binding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7739</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajaxian.com mentions filicio.us in the context of a discussion of the possibilities for using S3 together with JavaScript. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajaxian.com mentions filicio.us in the context of a discussion of the possibilities for using S3 together with JavaScript. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffen Christensen</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7738</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffen Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7738</guid>
		<description>Michael (and anyone else I guess),

The giving over of S3 key (and id) is something that we&#039;ve been struggling with. Luckily, Amazon&#039;s ACL system means that we don&#039;t need to store the user&#039;s secret key, but it&#039;d be better to avoid this all together. I guess Amazon isn&#039;t really targeting services like ours, but hopefully, in time, they&#039;ll let people sign requests with a few http redirects so even won&#039;t have to ask for the secret key. Much like other api&#039;s such as the flickr api is working now. (This would also help alleviate the complexity of signing up to a service, which is powered by personal S3 accounts.)

One thing to look at for S3Ajax could be Mozilla&#039;s build in support for reading the user&#039;s local files (an example: http://www.captain.at/ajax-file-upload.php). If S3Ajax is used for very specifik purposes, this may be a workable method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael (and anyone else I guess),</p>
<p>The giving over of S3 key (and id) is something that we&#8217;ve been struggling with. Luckily, Amazon&#8217;s ACL system means that we don&#8217;t need to store the user&#8217;s secret key, but it&#8217;d be better to avoid this all together. I guess Amazon isn&#8217;t really targeting services like ours, but hopefully, in time, they&#8217;ll let people sign requests with a few http redirects so even won&#8217;t have to ask for the secret key. Much like other api&#8217;s such as the flickr api is working now. (This would also help alleviate the complexity of signing up to a service, which is powered by personal S3 accounts.)</p>
<p>One thing to look at for S3Ajax could be Mozilla&#8217;s build in support for reading the user&#8217;s local files (an example: <a href="http://www.captain.at/ajax-file-upload.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.captain.at/ajax-file-upload.php</a>). If S3Ajax is used for very specifik purposes, this may be a workable method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7732</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7732</guid>
		<description>Oh, and thanks for the mention, Michael!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and thanks for the mention, Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7731</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7731</guid>
		<description>filicio.us looks pretty interesting, though I was a little squicked out by submitting my S3 credentials to a 3rd party site.  

I suppose that&#039;s hard to avoid, though it&#039;s something I&#039;ve tried to do with S3Ajax.  I&#039;ve been playing with Dojo&#039;s storage module to retain the ID and key.  Since the authentication signing happens in the browser, and I&#039;m not using cookies, the credentials never leave the local machine.  The other nice thing about S3Ajax is that the only servers you need are the S3 servers themselves.

On the other hand, the one thing I&#039;ve not been able to do in S3Ajax is actually upload a file from a user&#039;s local filesystem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>filicio.us looks pretty interesting, though I was a little squicked out by submitting my S3 credentials to a 3rd party site.  </p>
<p>I suppose that&#8217;s hard to avoid, though it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve tried to do with S3Ajax.  I&#8217;ve been playing with Dojo&#8217;s storage module to retain the ID and key.  Since the authentication signing happens in the browser, and I&#8217;m not using cookies, the credentials never leave the local machine.  The other nice thing about S3Ajax is that the only servers you need are the S3 servers themselves.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the one thing I&#8217;ve not been able to do in S3Ajax is actually upload a file from a user&#8217;s local filesystem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffen Christensen</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7729</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffen Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7729</guid>
		<description>A shameless plug in the context of this post:
Last week we released a Ajax powered S3 app, which basically allows uploading, downloading, tagging, renaming, and sharing files through our site directly to a personal Amazon S3 account. There&#039;s even an undocumented api, which exposes the files and meta data in to 3rd party projects. To us it was basically a web 2.0 proof-of-concept that went overboard, but the application should be fully workable even if there are still some items left on the todo list.

The web site is http://filicio.us, and you can test the application without registering by logging in with demo/demo as username and pwd.

And there&#039;s much more info about the application and the current status on our blog: http://blog.filicio.us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shameless plug in the context of this post:<br />
Last week we released a Ajax powered S3 app, which basically allows uploading, downloading, tagging, renaming, and sharing files through our site directly to a personal Amazon S3 account. There&#8217;s even an undocumented api, which exposes the files and meta data in to 3rd party projects. To us it was basically a web 2.0 proof-of-concept that went overboard, but the application should be fully workable even if there are still some items left on the todo list.</p>
<p>The web site is <a href="http://filicio.us" rel="nofollow">http://filicio.us</a>, and you can test the application without registering by logging in with demo/demo as username and pwd.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s much more info about the application and the current status on our blog: <a href="http://blog.filicio.us" rel="nofollow">http://blog.filicio.us</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Kimble -- The Dev Theologian</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/s3-javascript-bindings/comment-page-1#comment-7727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Kimble -- The Dev Theologian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1113#comment-7727</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cool and Scary New AJAX Technology...&lt;/strong&gt;

I just read this article on Ajaxian about the new S3 Javascript Bindings.&#160; Very cool!&#160; They...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cool and Scary New AJAX Technology&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I just read this article on Ajaxian about the new S3 Javascript Bindings.&nbsp; Very cool!&nbsp; They&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

