Thursday, February 21st, 2008
Category: CSS, JavaScript
, Performance
I just ran it on Firefox beta 3 on the Mac and the final results (for what it is worth) were:
Dojo comes up top, and gets a lot of green bars, as does jQuery, and even MooTools. Prototype wins on “.classname” which is very commonly used.
Caching and dynamic views
My client does not want to change his cache settings on IE and I'm trying to figure out a way to dynamically update a view each time it is visited. I...
IE 8 Crashing Problem
Hello Everyone,
Here\'s the situation:
two iSeries boxes - Dev and Prod both V5R4M0
We\'re using AJAX to dynamically load content using a tabbed...
JQuery Function Not Defined?
[div]Hi there,[/div]
[div][/div]
[div]I\'m trying to set a php session variable from a radio button. The idea is that a jquery function is called...
In Episode 25, we chat about IE 8, standards, Acid3, server side JavaScript, and more.
Who are the ajaxians? Find out.
Please contact us at . We would love to hear about any news that we could put up here.
We have individual blogs too:
I have heard rumors that the DOM-setup in the Slickspeed test isn’t really comparable to real-World use-cases. Is that true?
DOMAssistant has been updated recently, and even has a slickspeed test as well :-)
http://www.domassistant.com/slickspeed/
If Moo Beta is included, they should also include Dojo 1.1 Beta.
One thing to note is that these tests should also be run in IE. Most of us use FF for day-to-day stuff but IE is still the most commonly used browser.
Dojo’s performance in both FF & IE is great.
Holy crap! So Prototype 1.6.0.2 is essentially the slowest framework (at least on my machine, on both Safari 3 and FireFox, and on almost all the selector tests)
If I remember correctly, Prototype was The King in this slickspeed test some time ago, or am I wrong?
@zeno
You have to wonder how accurate these tests really are. If you run this test, and the domassistant’s test, you will see totally different results for the same frameworks and their versions.